you choose not to beleive the thing you think I made up. that's OK. Have a nice day lol
Printable View
It is true. Whether you believe me or not isn't relevant. If you honestly think there are not people like that in Wales then you must live in a bubble. But that's up to you. as I have told you so often, this is just a football message board. What it certainly is not is a group with its finger on the pulse of the nation, not by a long chalk!! :hehe:
But you've got your finger on the pulse of the nation as you know of all these people that you speak of who want pubs to remain closed - "people with influence", even.
Yet, you have failed to name a single person who you accuse of having these thoughts/beliefs/intentions... because you're making it up.
I'm not "accusing" anyone. It's not a crime or something but they do have a disproportionate influence on people who make decisions.
I spoke about some of these in a previous thread. I'm not going to repeat myself. Take it as my opinion, then you can either agree or not but it isn't going to change any time soon.
So it’s your opinion that these people exist who don’t want pubs to open and have undue influence over people in power ? :hehe:
It's your opinion now. OK then, because you didn't pre-empt any of your previous musings about the topic with an "in my opinion" or "it's my belief" - it was stated as fact.
"Some people believe that all pubs should be closed and never allowed to reopen" doesn't sound like an opinon to me.
Unlike some on here I never state something as 'fact' unless its something I have actually done. Many state things as fact when they are not in the hope that if they repeat it often enough it will be accepted as fact. A theory very close to Gobbells' heart I believe. I honestly fail to see why people are so interested in what i say as to keep on and on about it. you must be very very bored!
But I never said it was a fact where as often on here people do. I don't give a toss who believes what. When we chat we never prefix or qualify things we say with "This is a fact" or "this is conjecture" or whatever, we just say what we think. That's what I do. It's other people who love to pick at a certain word or a certain interpretation they put on it and try to make out the person said or meant something he didn't
as I said, you can go on all day, argue amongst yourselves if you wish,Ii really don't give a toss. :-) Lets wait and see what the governemt actually does shall we? Because we on this board certainly are not going to influence anything.
I never said it was fact but on here people want chapter and verse for everything said, 'link' 'where did you see' that 'prove it' etc. its nonsense. You would never conduct an ordinary conversation in a pub like that. Anyone would think it was a court of law. It's not. Nothing said on here will ever affect anything, its just a football chat site. nothing more. Chat and enjoy. All the the Faux outrage, the righteous indignation and the 'holier than thou' PCposturing is just a load of bollox.
It is from my own observations and general knowledge, my experiences from living here. And i trust my won experiences and instincts a lt more than some of the shite touted on her believe me. Now that's enough. i'm not going to change my opinion and nothing you say will alter it so there is no point in prolonging this.
So you’ve seen with your own observations people with undue influence who don’t want pubs to ever open again?
I often ask people their sources because it may be a topic that interests me, but I don't question every thing that every person says. i never intentionally apply double standards, I do'tn'trawl the web to try to prove somebody wrong just because I disagree with them as some clearly do and, as I said, I never state anything as 'fact' unless it is something that I have done.
i say things on here as one might say them to one's mate in the pub (I use the term 'one' as I have been pulled up today for using the word 'you' by someone who chose not to understand that i was speaking generally) Its is not a court of law it just a chat sitr, I'm sick of saying that. In fact I'm sick of this stupid argument. If you do not believe that there are people who have an undue influence that's fine. So for example Cummins doesn't have an undue influence on Boris. I'm glad we sorted something out.
Why do you people always change things to suit your reply and to suit your agenda.
No one has said there are not people with undue influence (like Cummings). They have just queried your wild claim that the South Wales chapters of Soda and the Temperance Society have undue influence with policymakers who control pub licensing and opening hours.
It is just highlighting the difference between fact and fiction - or reality and made up nonsense.
I have no idea what SODA is not being a political animal as you are, and I never mentioned the temperance society, but some of these people would probably be members of it if it still existed. I did not say they have undue influence with the people who control pub licencing and opening hours either. you ar changing things to suit your agenda.
I said there are certain kinds of people who dislike pubs and drinking and they would be happier the longer that pubs are closed and if it means a lot will never reopen then they will be happy. They have no thought for the people who's livelihoods rely on them. And these people do have the ear of the government and do exert a level of influence that the average man in the street never could. That is my belief, if it isn't your well that for you. I don't really care.
Why do people persist with this? i'm not going to change my belie and you're not going to change yours. Live with it, I can!
You said "but they do have a disproportionate influence on people who make decisions." - that may be your opinion, but you say it as if it is factual. Who are these people with influence, where are they? W hy has it taken them centuries to get pubs to close down at a national level. What changed to cause them to finally get all the pubs closed in the country, and to keep them closed?
".. the Welsh Government have said they MAY allow some resumption of the tourism before the END of summer..". The difference between UK/England and BJ and Drakeford is BJ has one eye limiting the catastrophic damage to jobs, economy etc., whereas Drakeford isn't bothered - just showing how different he can be. Of course he's "one of us ", so exempt from criticism here in Wales,
He has spoken about them in a previous thread - maybe even this one. He didn't say who these people were then, he won't say who they are now, and he will probably never say it.
I think he grew up in a religious, chapel going setting. I'm not knocking that for a minute. However, not many people grow up in those settings these days (I am assuming xsnaggle is in his 70s), and I would be amazed if the chapel goers had any influence at any level (national, local, or even street) at any stage of the last 100 years. That is, of course, assuming he is talking about some sort of temperance society.
I know the Temperance Societies had some success in valleys towns, making areas of towns pub free at a time when there was literally a pub on every street corner. Especially in hard working areas like Ebbw Vale, Tredegar, Merthyr and so on - but a lot of that success stems from the 19th Century.
I wonder if he is talking about these groups, or someone else?
Do you really think Drakeford is basing all his decisions on a "let's be different from England" approach? Welsh schools are reopening to pupils across all school years from June 29th, and the school term has been extended by one week. I suspect that is based on the scientific evidence rather than a "let's beat England" mindset. Similarly, I suspect Drakeford is also basing the tourism roadmap on the scientific evidence being presented to him.
But his minister said the 5 mile rule. would still apply and that people would only be allowed in places where they have their own bathroom and kitchen because there would be not restaurants or what have you available. But even if someone in Cardiff wants to go to England to (for example go to the beach) he/she will break the 5 mile rule before getting anywhere near England and someone coming from England the other way will have a similar problem. Are they going to allow an Englishman to drive to a cottage in Pembroke for his holiday but tell me I can't drive 8 miles to Barry island? It's nonsense.