Churchill was a sexist, racist, egotistical drunkard who had affairs .
Boris does sound more like that than the others you have mentioned, just a much more ineffectual version.
Printable View
It highlights just how stupid it would be to relax the lockdown in the UK now. We have not established a decline in new cases, and deaths are still high.
Interestingly, 40 cases are linked to one night club which was visited by a 29 year old who went on to test positive (South Korea are using massive testing and tracing to monitor the outbreaks). That is not implying that the 29 year old went on to infect 40 people, but it is pinpointing a specific location as a common factor. South Korea's first wave makes ours look like a tsunami.
i did not mean incubation till the person showed symptoms, i quoted Hilts who mentioned tests at the airports, i used a example of coming into contact / being infected at the departure airport and a test at the destination airport ( unless they flew around the world 7 times ) would still be negative, as i said the governments expert said they think it can take a few days from contact and infection till a test would show positive
Where did he divert the food to?
.... but I won't forget.
You actually said
That implied that people would still be negative because of the incubation period, but I am willing to write it off as poor English.
Regardless, no-one knows how long it takes for a test to pick up infection.
Also, even during the closure of the borders, an estimated 15,000 people are arriving into the country daily. How this will be policed when we have even more people arriving will be challenging.
100,000 tests a day. The Government has achieved this target ONCE. And, to get to that stage, they included tests that had not yet happened.
200,000 tests by the end of May is the latest target. That's going to take a lot of creativity, maybe even changing the number system so we go
99998
99999
200000
Or, more likely
96877
96878
200000
Interestingly, the CMO said "Take care interpreting the data, it is difficult to identify trends from this data". I wonder what that means.
no its pointing out a fact that a government expert said that " they think incubation period is a few days ( maybe i should have added till a test would show as positive just to avoid confusion, but due to the example of the airport i felt it wasnt needed ) , so they might have come into contact in the departure airport, if we tested them on arrival they would still be negative " they have said that a test might not show up a positive until a few days have past from contact / infection , thus testing at the airport wouldnt work
but I am willing to write off your misunderstanding of my post due to you being you
When /i posted that I was wondering how long it would take you to turn up.
Was that the first indan genocide or the second one. giove me the datails please, I'm not sure.
I told you beofre, you're a waste of oxygen