I think Mike needs to make the smileys a bit bigger :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Printable View
I think Mike needs to make the smileys a bit bigger :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
George Papadopoulos is going off on one
https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
I wouldn’t trust to munch what a convicted criminal has to say Wales Bales
I don't don't trust anyone :biggrin: but there is something to it because they asked Trump not to release the FISA application data.Quote:
Originally Posted by CardiffIrish2
Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant
"Congressional investigators have confirmed that a top FBI official met with Democratic Party lawyers to talk about allegations of Donald Trump-Russia collusion weeks before the 2016 election, and before the bureau secured a search warrant targeting Trump's campaign.
Former FBI general counsel James Baker met during the 2016 season with at least one attorney from Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee's private law firm.
That's the firm used by the DNC and Hillary Clinton's campaign to secretly pay research firm Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative, to compile a dossier of uncorroborated raw intelligence alleging Trump and Moscow were colluding to hijack the presidential election.
The dossier, though mostly unverified, was then used by the FBI as the main evidence seeking a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant targeting the Trump campaign in the final days of the campaign."
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/40...dossier-before
You left out the best bitQuote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
"my source said"
"By John SolomonQuote:
Originally Posted by Veg1960
Opinion Contributor"
No, you left out the best bit, their timeline is destroyed! Talking of of sources, this whole BS narrative was built on anonymous sources that were used by the New York Times and Washington Post to construct the Trump Russia Collusion Delusion. Are you going to learn anything from this, or are you going to continue drinking the Kool-Aid? You need to develop some self-awareness, so that you can place yourself in the space between what is reality, and what you are being told is reality. Can you do it, or is it your goal to just become another lardy?Quote:
Originally Posted by Veg1960
"By lardyQuote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Propagandist in Chief"
If true then I would agree with you. It may well be true, it may not be. Quoting an unnamed source does not make it a fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Self awareness, ffs
That's your job surely?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
The timeline has been much kinder to me than it has for lardy.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
John Solomon and Sara Carter are a known outlet for this kind of stuff, the thing is can you suggest anything that they have been wrong about?Quote:
Originally Posted by Veg1960
I have no idea if they have been wrong in the past - though I do suspect there would be no admission if they had.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Quotes from unnamed sources should not be treated as facts - A point you have made repeatedly in the past
What I am saying is some unamed sources are more reliable than others :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Veg1960
The name of the lawyer from the DNC law firm of Perkins Coie mentioned in John Soloman (contributor) article has now been revealed as Michael Sussmann. You heard it here first :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Veg1960
Somebody's getting a little nervous and agitated
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The very rude elevator screamers are paid professionals only looking to make Senators look bad. Don’t fall for it! Also, look at all of the professionally made identical signs. Paid for by Soros and others. These are not signs made in the basement from love! <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Troublemakers?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#T roublemakers</a></p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1048196883464818688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
It true, they were seen in Flakes office earlier in the week! The Dumbocrats really are dumb :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
I visited this thread just to quote Don's Soros remarks only to be beaten to it. Drat and double drat.
His more critical supporters have wondered for yonks why he hasn't made light of George the Nazi collaborator's endless sh*t stirring. He might surprise them again one day by typing the name Seth Rich at his Twitter account.
You staying away from the Russian threads for some reason. What do you think George Soros had to do with Seth Rich's death out of interest?Quote:
Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.
You're turning into a right old sniper these days! Still, it's probably a good way of participating for those who dont have anything useful to say :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Reasonable questions given the drivel that I was commenting upon. You seem to have previous on Seth Rich, so what do you think George Soros had to do with it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Anyway, about that FBI exoneration for Kavanaugh you were explicitly stating, any time you are ready.
Considering George Soros has a lot to do with everything, I would be interested in hearing his opinion :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
You would be disappointed, I heard he has little self-awareness so when challenged he usually comes back with deflectionary nonsense or avoids the questions he was posed all together.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
He sounds like a great fella, astute, clever, moral, thoughtful, if only I could be like him!Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JDzlhW3XTMQuote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
He had nothing to do with his death as far as I'm aware. What's curious about Don having zilch to say concerning Rich is that would and would have helped him counter the Russian collusion/hacking narrative.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
He had nothing to do with his death as far as I'm aware. What's curious about Don having zilch to say concerning Rich is that would and would have helped him counter the Russian collusion/hacking narrative.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
With Don, it's all about timing. When he mentions something, you know it's about to come out. The latest example is this Ford woman. He mocked her the other day and the press went crazy. Now we hear that Ford and her best "beach friend" were tampering with witnesses in the Kavanaugh case.Quote:
Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.
Rosenstein to travel with Trump on Air Force One
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...-air-force-one
He's a brave man!
The James Wolfe indictment has now been unsealed. This should be an interesting read for lardy, so he can see how all of his favourite journalists were getting their information that allowed them to perpetuate the Trump Russia Collusion Delusion. When the Carter Page FISA warrant details are eventually released, we will see that it was all made-up. Therefore, they were leaking made-up stuff to the New York Times and Washington Post who reported it with glee, which lardy then used to spam this thread. I wasn't joking when I said that lardy was a "useful idiot", and we now have the proof! :biggrin:
https://www.scribd.com/document/3813...mmittee-Leaker
You can read the actual transcript.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
To me it seems like he is saying some scientists agree and some disagree, hence "You'd have to show me the scientists".
This is not apparent from the article posted above.
There's a very odd argument, which Trump also makes here, that the overwhelming number of scientists who say climate change is manmade are doing it for political reasons, or because they are being funded to specifically come up with these results.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
I'd love to know who they think is behind this (it's never said of course) because as Trump has made clear, it's certainly not economically viable for countries to go green. If you want to create jobs then open the mines and burn the coal. So which group can be rich enough, can possibly be richer than governments and giant fossil fuel companies which are amongst the richest on the planet, to get almost the entire scientific community to diddle their research in their favour AND keep it secret (when funding for research is normally publicly available information)?
The answer, of course, is that there is no such thing happening.
In your opinion. Can you prove it?Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
The current state of play regarding Trump Russia Collusion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7nmAFpzyD4
Donald Trump: The great disruptor
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...reat-disruptor
I guess that is what he really is? He's definitely not here to be liked!
Not a comment on Trump as such because the figures for him aren't known yet, but this table tends to tell a story;-
https://pics.me.me/executive-branch-...l-23162512.png
It makes sense now that we are finding out how the justice department was being run.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
Ah, I see, Watergate and the Iran Contra affair were justice department productions then, helped along by the Clinton's and Obama presumably.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales