My sources indicate that World War III will kick off this Friday. No war will be declared and it won't be termed as WW3 for several months. Ukraine is where to keep an eagle eye upon.
Printable View
My sources indicate that World War III will kick off this Friday. No war will be declared and it won't be termed as WW3 for several months. Ukraine is where to keep an eagle eye upon.
I won't believe it until our leader Cyril can confirm it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.
I do love the way you tie yourself in knots fair play:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
If there is a crime they should sue or prosecute or shut up and stop the innuendo (Cohen sued prosecuted and found guilty and sentenced, Manafort prosecuted and found guilty awaiting sentencing, Flynn prosecuted found guilty awaiting sentencing, Papadopolous prosecuted and imprisoned).
Yeah but they were always lying snitches, coffee boys or entrapped so you can't believe a word despite any supporting evidence.
But look......look......more Hilary innuendo so just as bad as the Maestro and if it turns out she did a tax dodge then that totally exonerates Pres so there! It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.
Keep your dignity, he is just having a laugh at your expense.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Where's the oversized lady with a microphone??Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Not another White House Press Conference. Tell Sarah not to give it to Acosta this time!Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
The judge wants all documents pertaining to the Flynn 302's by Friday 14 Dec.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DuQPncrU8AANNqW.jpg
In fairness Brian and Ed have reported more correct things then Sara carter And Qanon(this month wiillnsee the indirnents, honest, they’re coming this month now honest repeat repeat repeat.....)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelsonca61
The comments from ED and Brian are some of the best on twitter, they provide great entertainment :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by CardiffIrish2
Sara Carter along with Hannity allegedly have protected status and can go a little bit further than most, when she gave her little bit of news on FOX the other night (incidentally FOX is no longer the Trump machine it once was) I would guess that she was given the Nod to confirm and bring into public domain the indictments, they are available to see by the public at pacer.gov so conspiracy is not an issue here other than the content of the indictments.
Everything that the popular media refuse to report is a conspiracy theory by default.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelsonca61
The National Enquirer has published some pretty outrageous headlines containing little or no truth over the years including debunked conspiracy theories about Hilary Clinton's health and the role Ted Cruz's dad played in the Kennedy assassination (then again it has suppressed quite a few truthful ones). In your view is the NE popular media these days?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Went off in Meadows face it would appear!Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelsonca61
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...-own-witnesses
I love a grammatical error with iceQuote:
Originally Posted by CardiffIrish2
Bad spelling is sign of a genius.Quote:
Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.
Various bomb threats as the hearing started, not read the report, I watched the hearing on the tube, meadows and fitting appeared week IMO but the two whistle blowers turned the tables and basically told meadows to shove it up his was, has had to play a bit partisan role to appease the dems did you watch it or is your article your view ?Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
<h2>Aladdin movers conroe tx
</h2>
<a href=http://www.trekmovers.com/>Trek Movers</a>
»<h1> When it comes to money, do not act like a child! - www.trekmovers.com </h1>
<p> I spend every free minute possible with my three-year-old son. And it never ceases to amaze me the amount of special treatment he receives. Sure, it's probably the standard treatment for all children, but it seems that he always gets all the extras and extras that life has to offer at his age. An extra scoop of ice cream for your ice cream cone, extra sparks in that cone, free stickers and postcards from the bank and the post office, groceries from the grocery store, and the list seems to go on forever. Sometimes, after a day of errands, one would think it was his birthday or something. So I began to compare your virtual life of bliss and excess with the harsh reality of my financial life. Chico, what a difference there is. I soon come to the conclusion that with respect to all financial issues, you are no longer a child ... </p> <p> College graduates, wake up! </p> <p> Take this idea until I graduate of the university, because I think it's about the time when financial reality should begin to be established. Besides being older and, hopefully, more mature, we probably start our first serious job in life, and most importantly, there is no more mom and dad. </p> <p> The part of being employed is good because it means We have our first serious and steady income stream in life. The second part about mama and papa is the rapper. They were always there for you, right? Always willing to send you money out of thin air just because they thought you might need it. Always there to help fund "extra" projects for the school. And they never seemed to say "no". Trust me, besides being very proud of you for graduating in college, you will also be happy with the fact that you will not have to worry about all this financial support. never more. As the phrase says: "You're all baby!" </p> <p> What does this mean? </p> <p> So what does this mean for you? Well, if I could go back and do it again, I would have taken better control of my finances, instead of letting them control me. Now is the time to "lift up the man", "take a step forward", whatever you want to call it. Because it's going to be one way or another, whether you administer it or administer it. </p> <p> Set the tone </p> <p> Specifically, what you need to do is create a good and solid set of financial habits at this time, before the bad guys can start. These should include, but not be limited to: </p> <ul> <li> Building a good credit history, if you have not already done so </li> <li> Do not spend beyond your means </li> <li> Put something aside for retirement </li> <li> Save where you can </li> <li> Spend less where you can </li> </ul> <p> Start now, or you can never < / p> <p> Each of them could be a complete article in itself, but I think you understand the point. The time to start is now. It is much easier to start and maintain a good habit from the beginning than to break a bad habit and then start the good. I can certainly attest to that. He probably had not left school for more than two minutes before having a fist full of credit cards and could not wait to get them out to the fullest. It took me years to recover from those debts and the same time to unlearn my old spending behaviors and to learn new ones again. </p> <p> You are no longer a child </p> <p> The days of the splashes additional and the free balloons are over. The sooner you realize that fact and the sooner you control your finances with a lot of financial habits, the better it will go. </p> <p> Feel free to share your thoughts and comments on this subject with our other readers and visitors. below. </p> <p> (photo credit: abbybatchelder) </p> <p> </p>
<h3>Do movers hook up washer and dryer
Affordable movers mesquite tx
Packers and movers bannerghatta road
</h3>
For some bizarre reason I thought a hearing contrived between one of Trump's favourite arse-licking Congressmen, who amongst others, has for 6 years tried and failed to produce anything incriminating on Hilary Clinton might not be a productive use of my time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelsonca61
This was a pathetic last roll of the dice where Meadows was so desperate to get something out of the Uranium/Foundation bull you and WB gorge yourself on that he believed the stuff that Solomon and Carter were feeding him. The so-called whistle-blowers pulled the rug from under his feet by refusing to publicly disclose documents some of which Solomon had already given him privately in full view of the cameras opened up for this charade. No wonder even Trump, so needy for a new Chief of Staff turned Meadows away.
Still D5, you have it all, keep the faith eh. Hope the RBG, whatever that is, was cold enough for you.
More coherent than some posts on here I thought!Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewmover
Never mind the Trump concentrate on the Watford game ,which I believe your at ,awful weather for it thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
You got enough on your plate today leave the Trumpness/Brexit stuff to the settees fans ,lets hope the seats say where they should be on the trip. ?
:tbg:Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
May your god go with you .Quote:
Originally Posted by Taunton Blue Genie
Should have stayed in and talked bollocks on here instead!Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
Indeed it is very therapeutic , I await the next pearl of wisdom.Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Back in the right Fred!!!!, General Flynn today, this is the marker of the alleged collusion possibly.
Attachment 2790Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
Which bit did you like best?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelsonca61
Was it:
a) the judge getting Flynn to publicly admit he knew that lying to the FBI was illegal:
b) the judge getting Flynn to publicly admit he was guilty of a crime;
c) the judge telling Flynn that arguably he let his country down;
d) the judge telling Flynn that he undermined everything that the US flag stood for;
e) the judge asking the Prosecutor whether Flynn could be charged with treason;
f) the judge not hiding his disgust and disdain for the offences that Flynn admitted;
g) the judge giving Flynn 90 days to undertake further co-operation with Mueller or face a prison sentence;
h) all of the above or
i) none of the above?
:popcorn:
A view of the Flynn procedings from a lawyer who was present in the courtroom..
https://www.pscp.tv/w/1mnxeOwrpmoGX
The guy certainly likes context. Here is a bit more context on what "the lawyer" likes to do in his spare time!Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
https://medium.com/@willchamberlain/...q-1d984a20aa67
I know it must be galling for you because you have gone the full nine yards on the Flynn was set up, Flynn won't go to court, Flynn will be let off and never get to court, the judge will halt this because of the set up.
In the meantime he pleaded guilty and entered into co-operation with Mueller during 19 separate interviews and handed over thousands of documents relating to an on-going investigation that is still to conclude (details totally redacted in the Mueller mitigation plea on Flynn's behalf).
Now Flynn gets excoriated by a judge who has a reputation for filleting prosecutors if they get their law wrong and sends Flynn away to sharpen his cooperation pencil some more if he wants to have any chance of avoiding a custodial sentence. Yet in WB land that is all nonsense because a lawyer that arranges MAGA meets in Trump hotels as a leisure activity says so.
What with your Clinton Foundation "whistle-blower" story in ashes whilst Trump's Foundation is being closed after an investigation found that it was being used for the Trump's personal use rather than charitable causes then not a great couple of weeks for the evidence and fact free bull you consume in vast quantities.
a) is he a lawyer?Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
b) was he in the courtroom?
c) all of the above or
d) none of the above?
:biggrin:
SoooooooooQuote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
In a nutshell the MAGA version of Cilla Black is right and the judge and the facts aren’t WB I’m summising from your post?
Maybe just read the court transcript, yeah?Quote:
Originally Posted by CardiffIrish2
You are more likely to get a straight answer out of Sajid Javid on whether May's immigration target has been ditched.Quote:
Originally Posted by CardiffIrish2
That would be c) all of the above. Now have a go at mine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
I don't even know where to start with yours :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
You don't have to plead incompetence it's plain to anyone blessed with the ability to readQuote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Not had much time to read about this, the snippets I have read, I believe this to be the beginning of the end for the current president, additionally there is generally a 36 hour rule for any meaningful outcome (regarding this president), this is the time that CNN et al, orgasm and spin what they can, after the 36 hours, the nuts and bolts eventually surface, Trumps base are sniping each other and many frightened to death to make a comment until QAnon has commented, the topic is now, who are the Democrats going to allow to challenge in 2020, will they allow it to be democratic, or will the steal be in play again I'd like it to be a woman but not HRC, having the 1st female president and not her would be kinda sweet :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by cyril evans awaydays
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelsonca61
I’ve disagreed with a lot you’ve said Nelson previously but I agree with you in that I hope the democrats go for a woman and it’s not HRC.
Obviously my answer is based on watching Veep on Sky Atlantic 😂
:hehe::donkey:maxine waters:cheerleader:
pulling us troops out of syria :thumbup:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogersblue
I was being serious!!!!!, Clinton Feinstein, Pelosi Waters etc. need to get the F out, the damage inflicted by these will only be measured in years to come, Ocasio-Cortez seems to be the new face on the block and being pushed, although she appears to be a bit outside the swamp rats, if she can put up with the back stabbing for the next three years and stay clear of the Bush/Clinton dynasty, tidy up her speaking then maybe, Nikki Haley may have a stab at it from the other mob, seeing an inauguration of a woman with Clinton watching on seething :biggrin: :biggrin: