http://linkis.com/www.neonnettle.com/n/fn3rb
Printable View
I hope this is more conspiracy nonsense, as TruBlue would have to eat humble pie for donkey's years if it were true :biggrin:
TruBlue's been rather quiet of late. Not surprising as he's been contemplating his future, what little of it which remains, anyway. :hehe:
It'll be like that time you were telling us that Londons financial markets were going to collapse within months. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
See if you can find the video you got really excited about.
I went away for the weekend with friends and family. You never know when I'm likely to be called up to fight world war 3 so I need to make the most of our time left. :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.
Nobody should have to eat pie, when things are deliberately hidden you can't really blame people for not seeing them, if people change their views they deserve party cake not humble pie, ditch the pies. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Don't worry, I'm quite sure I won't be eating humble pie. After all why would the Saudis know anything about 9/11, we've been told (on here at least) for years it was nothing to do with them....... :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R
The drums of war are beating louder. This article was written by the influential Editorial Board at The New York Times last Thursday.Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/29...law-state.html
For a worrier such as yourself I bet you are in a constant state of panic at the moment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Life must be tough.
I'm not worrying, I'm not of a draftable age. It will be more like Dad's Army for me, so I'm kinda looking forward to it ... We're doomed, doomed I tell you :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue
I meant in general, I haven't read the link, I turn the music up and don't listen to the drums of war, they just keep us in suspenders. :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue
Compare the tone between these two items, it doesn't take a genius to work out that something is up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/29/op...law-state.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqD8lIdIMRo
How old are you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
If 41 is the cutoff I just missed it. Besides I've got loads of international models I can hookup with, I'll just avoid the Russian, Chinese, Korean and EU ones :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue
You sound just like a bloke called Gluey who used to post on here. :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
A complete absence of mentioning Israel's airstrikes in Syria, or the assistance that they have been given to Jihadi groups there for the last four years,Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
That is intentional if you consider the rhetoric, that piece is most certainly a call for war.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splott David
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
"It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition"
http://educateinspirechange.org/alte...ed-demolition/
Sorry spotty, but your link is complete horseshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Splott David
http://www.gspellchecker.com/2016/09...ed-demolition/
http://eujournal.org/files/journals/...laimer.ESJ.pdf
But it's on the Internet??Quote:
Originally Posted by TH63
It must be Be true ???😃
Splott is a fair man who, he tells us, has spent years researching this. No doubt he will also share the counter argument on here when it is published next month.Quote:
Originally Posted by TH63
He won't be able to reply to this mate as you are on his ignore list..... :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
Splotty needs to tell MM that his ignore button is broken :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by TruBlue
You obviously have not read the entire comments section of the first link that you so kindly provided. I did and the basic questions asked of Stephen Knight (Godless Spellchecker) have not been addressed. Look at the exchange between Knight and Bob George more closely.Quote:
Originally Posted by TH63
Scrupulously fair Lardy. I have never denied that there are very sound countervailing arguments as this link makes abundantly clear.Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
https://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/com...terature_that/
However I am prepared to keep an open mind as to the possibility of fresh information emerging, as it has done so many times in the past, with other major global events.
Help me please, where in the comments section does it show that the ESJ said it was a controlled demolition?Quote:
Originally Posted by Splott David
You postedQuote:
Originally Posted by Splott David
"It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition"
It took me about 30 seconds to find out that the above statement was false with the following statement issued by the journal
"Regarding the recent developments on social media, we would like to inform the public that neither the European Scientific Journal, ESJ, nor the European Scientific Institute, ESI have published content on 9/11 attacks."
Typically however, as this doesn't match your agenda, you gloss over it and instead focus on a point that does suit your agenda. Personally I stopped reading at "First thing to clear up would be that these claims were not actually published in The European Scientific Journal at all, or any scientific journal for that matter"
You found some sensationalist, let's call it for what it is "LIE" on some obscure blog/tweet/conspiracy site, which you immediately jumped on and presented as some form of proof of your theory without doing a single minute of basic investigation or corroboration to check its accuracy.
I am of course completely certain that you will refuse to accept any of the above, and instead try to distract us all away from the fundamental FACT that your post I referred to was, as I put it, "horseshit" and probably put me on ignore again but hey ho.
I would suggest that in future, you try to do some impartial research on the nonsense that you present as supporting evidence of your theories, but we both know you won't.
Still, if it makes you happy.
Which part of this post did you have difficulty with?Quote:
Originally Posted by TH63
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splott David
David, you cannot genuinely be this stupid. It's very very clear that TH63 is referring to the ESJ part.
Isn't that self-explanatory?Quote:
Originally Posted by lardy
So what is your point?Quote:
Originally Posted by Splott David