https://www.express.co.uk/comment/ex...acob-rees-mogg
well...good luck to all you in the valleys especially..........and don't respond with the fact this is in the Express.....it is also many places elsewhere...it is FACT...
Printable View
https://www.express.co.uk/comment/ex...acob-rees-mogg
well...good luck to all you in the valleys especially..........and don't respond with the fact this is in the Express.....it is also many places elsewhere...it is FACT...
This should be a good'n, off out for a bite to eat and a couple of pints, will check back later to see how the climate religion brigade are doing :hehe:
Can you imagine yourself being on the wrong side of an argument with Lee Anderson just because you swallowed any pony from the Express and GB News?
https://fullfact.org/law/energy-bill...inal-offences/
“Lovers of freedom” :hehe:
You think the earth is flat and that the sun isn't centre of the solar system so I'd keep quiet if I were you.
Remember when they say man made climate change doesn't exist, these are the sorts of people who say it.
Not a single one can answer this, they will deflect, rant about how they know more about triple glazing (actually happened), say they know the answer but won't actually say for whatever reason.
What do Scientists say is the physical process behind climate change and what about that process do they disagree with?
Why don’t you reveal your party trick so we can finally close the door on the issue, and as an aside triple glazing is only beneficial if the rest of the house is energy efficient with the latest technology , which I doubt you could afford.
The environment agenda is only in play when governments can profit from it. Once a better source of revenue comes along, then they will pivot into something else. ULEZ an example. If you have an Aston Martin you can drive it as long as you pay.
Keep doing your bit though with your newly installed cavity wall insulation :hehe:
What a whopper.
Sunak with a big u turn today for the better 👍
The majority are, Rishi is currently Donald Ducked and in for a thrashing at the next election, its a major throw of the dice to retain power, I'd like to see Starmer say he'll reverse what Sunak did today meaning the next election would be an interesting yardstick for how the country really feels about Net Zero, virtue signalling on social media or the pound in the pocket. Who wins ? :hehe: my car is up for renewal next month any slight doubt is removed, my next one will be hydrocarbon powered.
Scrapping the tax on eating meat and mandatory car sharing are very important too, oh wait they didn't exist in the first place.
That was the biggest load of rambling nonsense I've ever heard and I listened to a lot of speeches by Boris Johnson so that is saying something.
This whole charade is nothing more than a spin doctors last roll of the dice, pure desperation.
Sunak’s good and clever speech managed to box in his predecessors i.e. Boris / May /Cameron / Labour the quote below was perfect :
“ climate change committee has rightly said you don’t reach net zero just by wishing it, but that’s what previous governments have done, both Labour and Conservative.”
folk have very little money the Petrol / diesel car ban kills them great it now put back
YEY Transition to heat pumps switch will be forced only when buying a new boiler, and from 2035.
yey Boiler upgrade scheme grant upped to £7,500.
yey Property energy efficiency requirements scrapped.
yey Future 7-bin requirement scrapped.
yey No new flight tax.
yey No ban on oil and gas in the North Sea.
Yey no ban on onshore wind is being lifted.
Rishi’s next best quote : “I care about reaching Net Zero by 2050 but on the current path, we risk losing the consent of British people.
My Quote :
Net Zero is a better off persons go to , you cant shove people into something you must take them with you . Poorer folk will not be able to buying 14K heat pumps , top end cars , they relay on hand me downs cars from the better off .
Zelenski must have been “instructed” to chat about the environment , whilst prolonging the military industrial complex :hehe:
https://x.com/calvinrobinson/status/...LhmySD2aRt-GNg
Attachment 5806
Just out of curiosity, what facts about human-induced climate change do you find troubling? If you need a reference to wrestle with in formulating your thoughts try: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-ass...-report-cycle/
I quote from the summary document:
"Human activities, principally through emissions of greenhouse gases, have unequivocally
caused global warming, with global surface temperature reaching 1.1°C above 1850-1900
in 2011-2020. Global greenhouse gas emissions have continued to increase, with unequal
historical and ongoing contributions arising from unsustainable energy use, land use and
land-use change, lifestyles and patterns of consumption and production across regions,
between and within countries, and among individuals."
I know, i refuse to be controlled, I finish my job near Tory Cowbridge today, a few of lads know you, starting a new job back in a red district on Monday. If it was 2 years on I'd have looked to put my feet up and join the sick note Britain Brigade, however being working class outta Roath, Ely, Rumney and Splott have chosen to put some more PAYE into the system :thumbup:
Rishi Sunak v Robinson Interview
"Here are the facts... We've committed to reducing our emissions by 68 percent.
"Here are some of the other countries' targets: the EU - just 55 percent; Australia 45 percent; America 40 percent; Canada around 20 percent; New Zealand 18 percent.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/othe...2af8c6c5&ei=50
Good interview in my books.
Mr Robinson mistakenly accused the PM of talking about "where we've been" rather than "where we're going".
Mr Sunak pointed out that the targets he just listed off are the 2030 targets, "so that's where we're going and we're going faster than anyone else".
The PM found it equally easy to defend his decision to push back the deadline on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars, telling Nick Robinson his arguments were "an easy thing to rebut".
Mr Robinson said EV manufacturers "will not have the incentive to invest".
"So if people want to talk about 'global leadership' those are the facts we should be dealing with."
Mr Sunak hit back in a blunt 10-point retort: "Well that's an easy thing to rebut. Because if you look at our target of 2035, it's completely aligned with pretty much every other major economy.
"France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Australia, Canada, California, New York, Massachusetts, Sweden.
"So in an industry that is global and integrated, it's very hard to argue that somehow, you know, we will be at a disadvantage when we're aligning our date with that of pretty much every other major country."
He added that given manufacturers operate globally and every other major country has gone with a target of 2035, the Government's new target "seems entirely sensible".
In the same interview, Mr Sunak argued Margaret Thatcher would have "agreed" with his approach to Net Zero targets, despite her being a trailblazer in telling the world about the need to look after the environment.
The PM joined his Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch in passionately defending the new policy approach this morning, with Ms Badenoch having a row on Sky News about whether poor Brits drive cars.
The Business Secretary accused Sky News's Jayne Secker of making "ludicrous" claims over net zero.
:thumbup:Same ere forged in Llanrummney , never been out of work , don't do sick , had house reprocessed when mortgages were of the wall at 9 % , divorced as a result of money pressures , did two jobs to recover and pay for the Court Administration Order ,there were days where id didn't eat , odd shop lift of milk and bread got me trough , you'd be surprised how many full un drink pints are left outside pubs ,did I give in nope .
Which governments , if were one of the best and only impacting on 1% got a feeling there maybe other countries out there, and opposition parties funding demonstrators for their own a political agenda ,instead of coming together as one to save the planet , same with NHS Labour have no real desire to fix it as it is a marvellous political tool ,why fix it when you use it ?