In view of the evidence emerging of Israeli filming of Nice and Munich 'terror attacks' over the last few weeks, what could possibly go wrong?
http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news...urity-olympics
Printable View
In view of the evidence emerging of Israeli filming of Nice and Munich 'terror attacks' over the last few weeks, what could possibly go wrong?
http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news...urity-olympics
You're in great company Splotty, chris made the same prediction for the euros :hehe:
No, to be fair you are not making the news. However, you have drawn a very odd link between "evidence" of Israeli's filming recent terrorist attacks, and the fact this security firm also comes from Israel. Not a logical link at all.
Let's see this evidence of filming.
The first thing that I would have questioned is the link between 'Israeli filming' of two recent 'terrorist incidents' I may then have looked at why all the Israeli installed cameras magically failed to work on buses and tubes during 7/7. After that I might have questioned why Israeli operatives boasted on TV that the reason that they were caught filming the twin towers on 9/11 was because they were there to 'document the event', going back further in time I would have recalled that the same reason 'document the event' was carried out by another Israeli agent, (Abe Zapruder) in Dallas when President JFK parted company with his brains. Now call me the suspicious type if you like, but when something walks like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a pretty reasonable assumption to think, that it's a duck...
I could have added the 'just happened to be passing' reason given by the Israeli TV crew who documented the Paris supermarket hostage incident, the former Israeli owned, Bataclan theatre massacre, or the Charlie Hebdo incident which was housed in a Rothschild owned building and financed by Israeli/French billionaire Xavier Neil, the owner of Golan telecommunications in Israel. but some may have thought that a bit too much like overkill....:-)
This sets the scene
http://www.debka.com/article/25551/N...ant-windshield
An Israeli (Mossad) news agency confirming that the rented ice cream truck was fitted with a "bullet resistant windshield". The reason? To create the impression that this was a well planned, well organised terrorist cell in France capable of stripping down a truck and retro-fitting bullet resistant windshields.
Then you have to have a cameraman who knows precisely what will happen and when it will happen.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/07/22/nice-munich/
With someone to feed him the information as to where these incidents will take place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdSkFmqTrLY
Ah, Feedback, the one time leader of the fundamentalist corporate media believers. Fair play to him, he could articulate his position very well on many topics. He'd still get mangled on a regular basis though. When in trouble his faithful acolytes, led by TruBlue, would enter threads to misdirect.
My fave discussion concerned the Tribe. Of course, he maintained that six million perished. Images were uploaded of memorial plaques that appeared at Auschwitz in the late 1940s and early 1990s. The first stated four million died there, the second had a revised figure of 1.5 million. He was asked how his total (along with Hollywood's) remained at six million. He nor his bag carriers could provide an answer to that simple maths question (in spite of him being an accountant).
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistoria...the_holocaust/
This discussion attempts to pull the 'accepted' figures together, with a breakdown per occupied country.
You ask questions, check on the information, verify the authenticity and the veracity of what you are looking at, cross check with other sources. Use critical analysis, look at prior similar incidents for evidence of specific patterns or links.
Alternatively let corporate media feed you with whatever agenda they are pursuing that week...
The world's foremost historian on this subject was the Israeli Raul Hillberg (now deceased) he was quoted extensively for decades until one day appearing in a court case as an expert witness, he was forced to concede that he knew of no possible evidence or information, which confirmed the presence of any form of systematic policy to exterminate an ethnicity. In fact Ken Livingstone was recently attacked for declaring (truthfully) that there had been a nine year relationship between German Nazis and Zionists. The result was that by 1939 70%+ of all German Jews had left Germany through perfectly legal channels, 60,000 of them sailed from Hamburg, in Nazi flagged ships to Haifa in Palestine.
Do you deny the links? Do you have alternative or countervailing information which discredits them? The only way that you can criticise them is if you have factual evidence to disprove that any of these links are authentic.
The intellectually incurious will always rely on msm to explain to them what it is that they should think about on a certain issue, according to which ever agenda they are following that week.
It may fly in the face of what you previously thought in relation to certain events, but then you have to question where you acquired that knowledge in the first place? You always have to bear in mind that the sins of omission are just as bad as the sins of commission. Thus in the areas of any news item, it is always what you are not being told about, that you should be questioning.
You could see it for yourself on the official USA Holocaust Memorial website. The breakdown of the maths as far as Germany is concerned is clear for all to see. The second part of what you have highlighted can be found in the book 51 Documents which details the nine yer relationship between German Nazis and Zionists. You have to bear in mind that Zionists wanted very similar things that the Nazis believed in. Unless they had money, or were young enough to fight to bring about a state, Zionists cared nothing for European Jews.