Can somebody explain. I saw the Oliver Stone movie but there was too much sweaty shouting and I couldn't concentrate.
Who dun shot El Presidente?
Printable View
Can somebody explain. I saw the Oliver Stone movie but there was too much sweaty shouting and I couldn't concentrate.
Who dun shot El Presidente?
Can't
I
Ask?
Complex set up of rifles me thinks LoM
Industrial scale military op
Any regime change since '63?
Abe (Zionist) Zapruder was there to document the event (nearly all the events are documented in one way or another) ably assisted by his homies.
http://www.rense.com/general96/missingframes.html
http://nodisinfo.com/26630/
A momentous event, of which we are still feeling the repercussions right up until this very day, and I suspect long into the future.
Dave Splott thinks he is a beacon of conscious thought but he is anything but.
That's what happens when you live in a modern day islamic dystopia, Iran.
He must have wolfed their propaganda down.
It was definitely Lee Harvey Oswald - he was in love with history.
Off the top of my head-
Abe lincolns assassination
Russian revolution
Holocaust
Jfk assassination
9/11
Second gulf war
7/7 bombing
Boston bombing
Oklahoma bombing
Fukishima earthquake
Sinking of a south korean warship by north korea.
I'm sure I've missed several hundred other events
Lee Harvey Oswald.
Unsure either way. I lean toward the notion that he wasn't one of the shooters. So so many details scream of false flag and his exit after the fact support the idea that he was unprepared for what took place. Oswald was pinned for the murder of a policeman moments later and this scenario really doesn't add up. He he was certainly set up to an extent.
I think he acted alone. Killing Kennedy was his golden chance to influence history - as a Marxist soldier it was just too good an opportunity to pass up. And he wanted to be famous. He was more intelligent and resourceful than he is often given credit for and certainly had the skills to accomplish the assassination. Political assassination was something that was at the forefront of his mind as he had already tried to kill General Walker. And on the morning of the Kennedy assassination - according to his wife - he left his wedding ring at home and took with him a large rifle-sized holdall (2 things he ordinarily didn't do). I suppose there is a possibility that others were ITK on what was going to happen - he certainly had some dubious associates - but I don't believe there was a Grand Political Conspiracy.
"there is a possibility that others were ITK on what was going to happen - he certainly had some dubious associates - but I don't believe there was a Grand Political Conspiracy."
These two assertions contradict one another. Either he acted alone or he did not. If others were in the know then by definition it was a conspiracy.
I think he acted completely alone but obviously I can't 100% prove it. There is a possibility that he confided in others. I don't believe there was a Grand Political Conspiracy. I don't think he was anybody's patsy.
Must listen. Gets juicy after 5 minutes...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
It makes you think when you consider that, back in 1963, the most powerful man in the world was killed by a lowly library worker. As a result, I never drive past my own local library with the top down on the car. I always thought the only people who worked in libraries were nerds and timid, plain looking nymphomaniacs, but why take the chance?
After jfk humiliated the ussr over cuba there was no way he could be allowed to live,finding a puppet was easy as was silencing him.