Mind control - does it exist?

I don't know too much about this topic, but I read somewhere that simply following external events while not focussing on internal events is a form of mind control. It is usually media led whereby a news story receives blanket coverage that draws people in and it gains their attention, and then after some time the coverage will suddenly be dropped and replaced by some new event which becomes a new point of focus. Then a short while after an old news story has ended, people will have little interest in that event, even though their minds were focussed on it at the time it was being covered by the media.

Any behavioural psychologists on here care to chip in?

That's deep for a Wednesday. :hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

That's deep for a Wednesday. :hehe:

---

he needs to get out more :hehe:

I don't believe it.















I mean you admitting you aren't an expert in something. :biggrin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

.... ..

Any behavioural psychologists on here ..

---

They would have an utter field day. Ah, I mean feel day.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Packerman

he needs to get out more :hehe:

---

I'm not complaining, I'm so glad I used the preview button and saw what I just wrote before I changed it to this. :hehe:

The "blanket coverage" switch annoys me. A few years ago the most newsworthy story was some disaster in Pakistan - a flood or an earthquake. Apparently millions of them were going to die in the winter because they were abandoned without food or shelter. Then suddenly they were no longer newsworthy and our attention was switched to something else.

I woke up one night about a year after the disaster and suddenly remembered all those poor people who were going to die. "Jesus Christ, what happened to them? " I wondered. I had a quick browse on the net but I couldn't find anything about it. Perhaps they all died and no one cared. Maybe someone saved them all and didn't tell anyone. After searching in vain for any news of them I gave up and watched some lesbian porn instead.

I don't think the "blanket switch" is to do with mind control. I just think people - editors included - just get distracted by other stuff.

It might be a bit leftfield but I think some times when News has been around for a few days/weeks, then more news comes along and people are bored of the previous news (however horrific) that news might be.

In Addition to that, people are "strangely" more interested in news that is closer to them, which is why things such as Pakistan floods might not get a great deal of interest in the UK, whereas a flash flood in Boscastle might do.

Mind control might be the exciting theory but it's much more likely to do with viewing figures and advertising revenues.

How boring.....

I'm just reading about project BLUEBIRD :ayatollah: :hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

I'm just reading about project BLUEBIRD :ayatollah: :hehe:

---

The globablists can't even fake a Brexit vote so they've got no chance of pulling one over David Vincent........

Unless they look like nice people that is. :biggrin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TruBlue

The globablists can't even fake a Brexit vote so they've got no chance of pulling one over David Vincent........

Unless they look like nice people that is. :biggrin:

---

What do you mean fake a brexit? :hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Vincent

The "blanket coverage" switch annoys me. A few years ago the most newsworthy story was some disaster in Pakistan - a flood or an earthquake. Apparently millions of them were going to die in the winter because they were abandoned without food or shelter. Then suddenly they were no longer newsworthy and our attention was switched to something else.

I woke up one night about a year after the disaster and suddenly remembered all those poor people who were going to die. "Jesus Christ, what happened to them? " I wondered. I had a quick browse on the net but I couldn't find anything about it. Perhaps they all died and no one cared. Maybe someone saved them all and didn't tell anyone. After searching in vain for any news of them I gave up and watched some lesbian porn instead.

I don't think the "blanket switch" is to do with mind control. I just think people - editors included - just get distracted by other stuff.

---

Great point.

It often seems to me that whenever some major disaster happens, there is non-stop media coverage, but the news cycle is such, that the media give the appearance of being bored and moves onto the next natural disaster, whilst the victims of the original one are left largely ignored by the media.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

I don't know too much about this topic, but I read somewhere that simply following external events while not focussing on internal events is a form of mind control. It is usually media led whereby a news story receives blanket coverage that draws people in and it gains their attention, and then after some time the coverage will suddenly be dropped and replaced by some new event which becomes a new point of focus. Then a short while after an old news story has ended, people will have little interest in that event, even though their minds were focussed on it at the time it was being covered by the media.

Any behavioural psychologists on here care to chip in?

---

Behaviour control exists. It exists so much in life. Through a webstore being a certain colour as different colours portray different emotions. To products being put in specific places, and being stylised. to odours in shops to help you spend more, to music. The way a letter is worded can make you more likely to do what the letter says. There are many many ways to not control, but to push people in a direction.

Heres one of the links I used to help design my webshop. You dont have to delve that deep into this sort of thing to see how easy it is to manipulate a persons behaviour. There are acid types drugs developed that can give pretty much full control over an individual's behavior.

The average human is easily led. Its in our genes we are a sociable animal. And yes of course retail and governments use this. Is it used as much as you might think, Hell no. Is it used by government as a form of propaganda now and again, absolutely.

But to be more on topic. People jsut get bored of a story. Even big stories barely run passed a week. That seems to be the most people keep an interest in something before they get distracted by new news.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

That's deep for a Wednesday. :hehe:

---

Not really, I just noticed a similar pattern with the threads being posted on here, and I wondered if it was a coincidence or not :-)

There were murmurings of the annual gay footabller story yesterday.

Radio 1 were saying that 1 in 10 football fans would refuse to watch their team if they had an openly gay footballer. From some random poll that conducted.

A gay local footballer said he had received abuse on the field because of his gayness. Do you believe that?.

It usually goes like this: Rumours of a premier league player "coming out", mass coverage from every media outlet as they'd be seen to be homophobic if they didn't cover it. Social media filled with "I wonder who it could be?!?!?!"

Nothing happens.

Repeat next year.

They do it every year........without fail.

Another one is when one winter 3 years or so ago, we had wall to wall coverage around the tories killing old people because they caused their poverty and not doing enough to help fuel costs. The very next year not even a sniff of the same story. Like, nothing. No one in mass media cared. In comparison to have none stop coverage of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordKenwyne

A gay local footballer said he had received abuse on the field because of his gayness. Do you believe that?

---

I don't know who your example is, but yes I do believe that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lardy

I don't know who your example is, but yes I do believe that.

---

Could well be true. Maybe it is just my local area but I don't know a team that would do that. The coaches wouldn't have it nowadays.

He said when the opposition found out he was gay they abused him while playing. How do they even find out?.

How can I comment for gay people, I am not one. But now I dont think many people care. Young people that is.

I try not to be cynical.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordKenwyne

Could well be true. Maybe it is just my local area but I don't know a team that would do that. The coaches wouldn't have it nowadays.

He said when the opposition found out he was gay they abused him while playing. How do they even find out?.

How can I comment for gay people, I am not one. But now I dont think many people care. Young people that is.

I try not to be cynical.

---

Most people don't give a shit and it's quite possible that the guy giving abuse didn't really give a shit either. But there are enough bellends around, maybe he wanted to get some kind of advantage.

What do you think you're being cynical about? That the gay player is making it up?

Not being argumentative, genuine question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LordKenwyne

There were murmurings of the annual gay footabller story yesterday.

Radio 1 were saying that 1 in 10 football fans would refuse to watch their team if they had an openly gay footballer. From some random poll that conducted.

A gay local footballer said he had received abuse on the field because of his gayness. Do you believe that?.

It usually goes like this: Rumours of a premier league player "coming out", mass coverage from every media outlet as they'd be seen to be homophobic if they didn't cover it. Social media filled with "I wonder who it could be?!?!?!"

Nothing happens.

Repeat next year.

They do it every year........without fail.

Another one is when one winter 3 years or so ago, we had wall to wall coverage around the tories killing old people because they caused their poverty and not doing enough to help fuel costs. The very next year not even a sniff of the same story. Like, nothing. No one in mass media cared. In comparison to have none stop coverage of it.

---

It seems to be thing to do at the moment, everyone is gay or transgender on tv or in the news, I'm all for the scales being balanced when it comes to people being fairly represented but like many other things these days the scales are being tipped the other way and that's not right either.
Take this thread for example, from previous posts I would say that none of us are gay, if this thread was on Hollyoaks 4 of us would be gay, 2 bisexual and the op would be going through a sex change :hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

It seems to be thing to do at the moment, everyone is gay or transgender on tv or in the news, I'm all for the scales being balanced when it comes to people being fairly represented but like many other things these days the scales are being tipped the other way and that's not right either.
Take this thread for example, from previous posts I would say that none of us are gay, if this thread was on Hollyoaks 4 of us would be gay, 2 bisexual and the op would be going through a sex change :hehe:

---

Ouch!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

Ouch!

---

That's based on the assumption that you haven't had one already, I wouldn't know, it's none of my business is it? :biggrin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wales-Bales

Ouch!

---

It's painful when your inbox is full :hehe:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

It seems to be thing to do at the moment, everyone is gay or transgender on tv or in the news, I'm all for the scales being balanced when it comes to people being fairly represented but like many other things these days the scales are being tipped the other way and that's not right either.
Take this thread for example, from previous posts I would say that none of us are gay, if this thread was on Hollyoaks 4 of us would be gay, 2 bisexual and the op would be going through a sex change :hehe:

---

Mind control to get population control. Too many people so convincing us to all be gay. Feck THEY are clever.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Dragon

Mind control to get population control. Too many people so convincing us to all be gay. Feck THEY are clever.

---

Did you get that from what I said?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

Did you get that from what I said?

---

Thrown in with a bit of Gluey logic, its clearly obvious that is what you were saying.

What better way is there for control the population without killing people!

:facepalm: :coat:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Dragon

Thrown in with a bit of Gluey logic, its clearly obvious that is what you were saying.

What better way is there for control the population without killing people!

:facepalm: :coat:

---

You should know me by now, if that was what I meant that's what I would have said, you can't make people gay, they either are or they're not, my point was, in their efforts to show that gay people are accepted by society they are overcompensating and it's not an accurate view of reality, I just don't feel it's necessary, not for me anyway as I've never had a problem with them.


btw if there is some sort of agenda it would not be about population control, more likely a swipe at the church. :biggrin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

You should know me by now, if that was what I meant that's what I would have said, you can't make people gay, they either are or they're not, my point was, in their efforts to show that gay people are accepted by society they are overcompensating and it's not an accurate view of reality, I just don't feel it's necessary, not for me anyway as I've never had a problem with them.
btw if there is some sort of agenda it would not be about population control, more likely a swipe at the church. :biggrin:

---

I don't know if that is true. George Melly went from being gay to straight and a recent Foreign Sectretary is supposed to have gone the other way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

You should know me by now, if that was what I meant that's what I would have said, you can't make people gay, they either are or they're not, my point was, in their efforts to show that gay people are accepted by society they are overcompensating and it's not an accurate view of reality, I just don't feel it's necessary, not for me anyway as I've never had a problem with them.


btw if there is some sort of agenda it would not be about population control, more likely a swipe at the church. :biggrin:

---

I think population control is an aspect of promoting the gay agenda. It's also about weakening family structures. I'm all for adults doing pretty much what they want, particularly behind closed doors, if their actions don't negatively impact other people, but no law will convince me that blokes buggering one another is anything other than abnormal and feral.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I think population control is an aspect of promoting the gay agenda. It's also about weakening family structures. I'm all for adults doing pretty much what they want, particularly behind closed doors, if their actions don't negatively impact other people, but no law will convince me that blokes buggering one another is anything other than abnormal and feral.

---

Is a man buggering a woman abnormal and feral aswell? Just wondering.

Absolutely.

I'm thinking you're a fan of deliveries round the tradesmen's entrance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Dragon

Thrown in with a bit of Gluey logic, its clearly obvious that is what you were saying.

What better way is there for control the population without killing people!

:facepalm: :coat:

---

The logic comes from the SRI, OSF, Tavistock, etc,. It's not the sort of thing that you could make up :biggrin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Vincent

I don't know if that is true. George Melly went from being gay to straight and a recent Foreign Sectretary is supposed to have gone the other way.

---

Years ago I had a gay couple living next door to me, we became good friends, one of them had been married and had children but he always knew he was gay, he just pretended he wasn't, you could argue that he turned gay but he didn't really, as for the other way around, I don't know, confused maybe?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I think population control is an aspect of promoting the gay agenda. It's also about weakening family structures. I'm all for adults doing pretty much what they want, particularly behind closed doors, if their actions don't negatively impact other people, but no law will convince me that blokes buggering one another is anything other than abnormal and feral.

---

Yeah you could say there is that aspect to it but I see that being done in other ways.

I would say the number one 'other' way is that the proportion of UK babies born out of wedlock has increased for 43 consecutive years and it's forecast that for the first time in 2016 more babies will be born out of wedlock than in. Welcome to Bastard Britain, the home of the lone parent benefit where it pays for mothers and fathers to live apart.

My bastard child still has both parents living together. Just because it's out of wedlock does not mean it's a lone parent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I think population control is an aspect of promoting the gay agenda. It's also about weakening family structures. I'm all for adults doing pretty much what they want, particularly behind closed doors, if their actions don't negatively impact other people, but no law will convince me that blokes buggering one another is anything other than abnormal and feral.

---

You hypocrite Organ. I've seen you mincing up and down Cowbridge High Street waving at lorry drivers and then giggling coyly when they wave back. You make Charles Hawtrey look like Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barry Dragon

Is a man buggering a woman abnormal and feral aswell? Just wondering.

---

Since the Greeks invented buggery and prince Phillip is Greek, it's almost certain that he has subjected her majesty the queen to this filthy practice. It says a great deal about her regal bearing that there is no record of her having mentioned this in any of her Christmas speeches, nor is it even hinted at on the stamps or currency. Such dignity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.

I would say the number one 'other' way is that the proportion of UK babies born out of wedlock has increased for 43 consecutive years and it's forecast that for the first time in 2016 more babies will be born out of wedlock than in. Welcome to Bastard Britain, the home of the lone parent benefit where it pays for mothers and fathers to live apart.

---

I wouldn't say that was another way, I'd say that was a consequence of the other ways, Feminism is the main culprit, search for how the Rockefellers re-engineered women or CIA funded feminism and you will find all sorts. :thumbup:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R

I wouldn't say that was another way, I'd say that was a consequence of the other ways, Feminism is the main culprit, search for how the Rockefellers re-engineered women or CIA funded feminism and you will find all sorts. :thumbup:

---

I think the reason fewer British people are getting married is that men don't want the cost and hassle of a traditional wedding. Women want that and they are refusing to go down the cheap path of a quick visit to the registry office.

Why bother with all those invitations, all that catering, the speeches, the honeymoon ? I told my last wife you can forget all that bollocks. My wife complained about the lack of wedding photos, wedding memories and a honeymoon, but I told her to think of all the money we saved. Just going to the registry office ourselves with only a couple of witnesses paid for many a good night in the pub.

I'm minded not to be sucked into media mind games, after being told that Cardiff is the biggest team in Wales.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David Vincent

I think the reason fewer British people are getting married is that men don't want the cost and hassle of a traditional wedding. Women want that and they are refusing to go down the cheap path of a quick visit to the registry office.

Why bother with all those invitations, all that catering, the speeches, the honeymoon ? I told my last wife you can forget all that bollocks. My wife complained about the lack of wedding photos, wedding memories and a honeymoon, but I told her to think of all the money we saved. Just going to the registry office ourselves with only a couple of witnesses paid for many a good night in the pub.

---

Dai, I think you might want to lay off the dirt cheap Lidl Albanian Rosé for the rest of the evening.