Picks Sol Bamba in his team of the week, but still has to have a dig at us - pompous dickhead.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46172478
Printable View
Picks Sol Bamba in his team of the week, but still has to have a dig at us - pompous dickhead.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46172478
Every single one of us has a better clothing style than him, so I wouldn't worry.
I think he literally doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Complete fool of a man.
It's media rules. You can only praise is if you have a dig after.
What is he on about?!
It's annoying seeing us being hated on by the media and pundits but it'll make it ever so sweeter if we can stay up. That'll really piss them all off. Just picture it.. scummy cardiff survive - love this club !
He is quite simply the worst pundit I have ever seen on TV. Tries to be eloquent and thoughtful, and just comes across as thick as pig shit.
Think Chris Eubank.
He said on football focus earlier in the season that Newcastle United could win the Premier League. When his fellow pundits started to laugh he then cane back with.... With the right investment 😀
I like him personally though because of quotes like the aforementioned
What cheek? Is he fecking serious? We’re not allowed to question the ref after a leg breaking tackle and our players have a cheek to not jump out of the way
How come we're getting blamed for that challenge?
He never actually asks a question either. He makes a statement then expects the person he's speaking to to respond.
Would love to see the media reaction had Cunningham made the tackle and been sent off. Deserved red probably for the worst tackle ever seen ala Ralls.
However, Cunningham should’ve known better than to be going for the ball as Stephens flew through the air. How dare he get in the way.
Reading this thread has got me nodding like this.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is how you can tell Garth Crooks has enjoyed an interview <a href="https://t.co/BwhEvEmnX3">https://t.co/BwhEvEmnX3</a></p>— Match of the Day (@BBCMOTD) <a href="https://twitter.com/BBCMOTD/status/792326521461411841?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 29, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
In fairness his integration of rock and roll elements into the country genre has earned him immense popularity in the United States and he should be at least acknowledged for that.
Especially contentious given that Brighton have committed more fouls than any other team in the league - and we’ve made the sixth least.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/prem...saison_id/2018
Given that he references awful tackles where Cardiff players have stayed on the pitch I would presume his reference points are the furore around Bennett on Sane and to a lesser extent Arter against Newcastle. I say that because 1) I can't think of any others and 2) I doubt Crooks would have spent a moment watching us unless we were playing against a Premier League team.
I think there has been some reasonable comment on this board about the amount of time other teams spend ganged up in the faces of referees at certain incidents and we have perhaps overplayed the offended innocents watching our response that got one of our key players needlessly cautioned.
But to judge Crooks by his own standards you would expect this man of principle to call out Chelsea the next time they surround a referee given the horrendous assault that Jorginho committed on Sigurdsson yesterday whilst staying on the pitch should he name any of their players in his team of the week.
There are bad pundits then Crooks who is a complete idiot.
Saying that Liam Rosenior after his comments about Cunningham is running him close.
Would love to know what challenges he's on about. Since Man City (last year), where there were a number of bad ones, I can't recall too many that would lead him to make that sort of comment. If anything we have stood off teams this year.
Someone else has pointed to the Arter challenge at Newcastle which wasn't great.
I have seen a number of match reports, blogs and messageboard comments that claim our players surrounded and influenced Martin Atkinson after the Stephens 'tackle' on Cunningham. It didn't happen!
I have just re-watched the incident and it is just what I remembered at the time. Gunnar, Ralls and Camerasa are the closest to the ref but none of them are in his face and none of them are remonstrating with him. In fact Gunnar turns away and the other two are 6 feet or more away. The card comes out very quickly based on Atkinson's own (correct) view of what happened.
Paterson definitely gets involved and initiates a scrum of players from both sides pushing and shoving and peacemaking, but that is all directed at Stephens - not the ref. The only time Patto goes near the ref is to receive his telling off and yellow card. However, no doubt the Garth Crooks (and others) version will now become the accepted truth.
Didn’t look to me like our players surrounded the ref, both sets seemed to run toward where the incident happened.
Also the ref seemed to give it very quickly too.
Perhaps ex Spurs player Crooks was having a dig due to Warnock’s comments over Kane.
Also we aren’t a dirty team, only 4 sides have less bookings now.. Chelsea, Liverpool and Man City - all of whom dominate games, so don’t really have to foul, and surprisingly , Newcastle who I though were as dirty as anyone down here.
Given we live off scraps of possession I don’t think those stats indicate a dirty team at all.
Crooks comes across as a bit thick if you ask me
No amount of evidence to bad our case matters with these people.
You hear the same stuff about our so called rough approach churned out time and time again and the problem is that as I said, mud sticks.
If referees, officials and football fans in general keep hearing this stuff over and over, they start believing it.
In a similar but quite different way, the shite that gets talked about how fantastic Liverpool are and have been since time immemorial, even though they have not one a premiership title ever.
A lot of people believe what they are told by these "experts".
Man City are very clever, they dominate possession and aim to win it back quickly if they do lose it but if they lose the ball in a bad position for them they think nothing of committing a foul to stop the play. There is hypocrisy at all clubs - but Crooks really doesn’t have a clue what he’s talking about in this instance as Atkinson produced the red card almost immediately
Danny Kelly said similar last night on his show last night :facepalm: once again , people just seeing what they want to see from a Warnock team.
I thought Brighton were very physical (and that’s being polite as some might say dirty ) and not sure why they had a problem with the red card , he had lost control of the ball and lunged in ...you can only imagine what they would have been saying had it been the other way around !
Also I would love to see how Morrison kept getting head injuries on Saturday, I think must have had treatment 3 or 4 times before having to go off ?
Glad someone brought this up as thought the same when saw it. If anything we don't foul enough. If only people could be questionned on their comments then everyone could see how ridiculous they are
The epitome of lazy journalism.
Probably not watched us much, sees someone say we are a dirty side and that's it.
I think this season we haven't been anywhere near as physical as we should be.
It's not just the pundits either. Having a read of the Brighton forum before and after was a laugh. How they should be beating the worst Premier league team ever.
Billy Big bollocks Brighton ffs, that scrappy little club we played in every division that played for years in a ground resembling that of Leckwith athletics club.
"Cardiff are a Warnock (I hate that bloke) team, Warnock teams are cloggers, Warnock teams play long ball football and rely on set pieces for their goals, Cardiff spent relatively modestly in the summer on Championship players - all of this means that Cardiff are fair game for a broadcast or online kicking from me when I've not got anything constructive to say about them (i.e. 100 per cent of the time). There, that's all I need to know about Cardiff City, they are obviously not up to Premier League standard and are certs to go down - possibly with a lowest ever points total. All of which means that there's no need for me to actually watch anything involving Cardiff other than goals (we all know that there'll be barely any going in the opposition net) and "controversial" incidents."
Taken from the Garth Crooks book of football punditry 2018/19, which so many "experts" are very well versed in it seems.