-
Warnock on sky sports
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BlueArmy 86
I do , yeah he overspent but he was exactly what we needed at the time
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
He was what we needed until he wasn't. Then he just became a liability. It's hard to say at the moment whether overall he did more bad or good for City.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
He was what we needed until he wasn't. Then he just became a liability. It's hard to say at the moment whether overall he did more bad or good for City.
Agree.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
He was what we needed until he wasn't.
Like a Rubber Johnny.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BlueArmy 86
Me
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
He brought the club back together.
When he came we were broken.
The football may not be better, but behind the scenes definitely is
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Armitage Shanks
He brought the club back together.
When he came we were broken.
The football may not be better, but behind the scenes definitely is
When you say it’s better behind the scenes, what do you mean exactly?
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
With the supporters mainly, I believe that our central goal is to support the team rather than factions who had more interest in fan v fan, fan v tan etc. This has definitely died down
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Lone Gunman
When you say it’s better behind the scenes, what do you mean exactly?
Dont be pedantic , you know what he means
Apart from the moaners the club feels a lot closer to the fans than it did under slade and trollope
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Armitage Shanks
He brought the club back together.
When he came we were broken.
The football may not be better, but behind the scenes definitely is
Totally
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
He was what we needed until he wasn't. Then he just became a liability. It's hard to say at the moment whether overall he did more bad or good for City.
Agree that he was what we needed initially but once he achieved promotion like many other clubs have done to survive we should have replaced him by Christmas with a Premier League Manager? After all Warnock has been in the Premier League with five different clubs and all have been relegated! Then he persuaded the board that he would get an immediate return if they gave him more cash, look what happened!
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SLUDGE FACTORY
Dont be pedantic , you know what he means
Apart from the moaners the club feels a lot closer to the fans than it did under slade and trollope
Did Warnock improve the scouting system? Did we bring through any local talent? Did our training facilities improve?
I saw him on Soccer Saturday last week as I was parenting. I'll admit he was entertaining and it's easy to see why he would've persuaded the thick (football wise) beauts that run the club in giving him mostly what he wanted.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Armitage Shanks
With the supporters mainly, I believe that our central goal is to support the team rather than factions who had more interest in fan v fan, fan v tan etc. This has definitely died down
I’d agree in terms of the support, but I asked the question because you said it’s better behind the scenes. To me, from the outside at least, the club itself doesn’t look any different now than it did before Warnock arrived. I don’t think he left any sort of legacy in terms of the way things are in the background.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
I think he's a dodgepot with dubious politics who made some appalling signings but I'll always be grateful to him for providing one of my most enjoyable seasons and allowing the club to start again united after the rebrand
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SLUDGE FACTORY
I do , yeah he overspent but he was exactly what we needed at the time
Sludge, he was exactly what we needed for one season to get us promoted. We then needed a proper PL manager, proven at that level, to take us forward.
StT.
<><
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Steve the Tea
Sludge, he was exactly what we needed for one season to get us promoted. We then needed a proper PL manager, proven at that level, to take us forward.
StT.
<><
Yes. Absolutely. Nailed it. Agreed. :thumbup:
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Armitage Shanks
With the supporters mainly, I believe that our central goal is to support the team rather than factions who had more interest in fan v fan, fan v tan etc. This has definitely died down
The supporters are not exactly 'behind the scenes', are they? In fact, along with the first team players and manager, they are the most prominent and noticeable feature of any club.
How we scout talent, negotiate contracts, training facilities and set up the various levels of squads from academy to first team etc, are what I'd consider behind the scenes.
No noticeable changes amongst that lot I feel.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Eric the Half a Bee
Yes. Absolutely. Nailed it. Agreed. :thumbup:
Not forgetting he saved us from probable relegation under Trollope.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
He was what was needed at appointment. Sorted out a shambles of a team. Got us promoted. Then the graph started declining. Poor recruitment mixed with failure to recruit in certain positions. Mackay twins- why.were they at the club ? Links to their father ? Unique Sports Management. U18s and U23s stagnating. Relegation. More poor recruitment. Turning against players he had recruited and not playing them. An unmanageable manager ? A legacy of an inadequate squad. Any regrets ? Yes, we should have got rid of him ASAP after relegation. Do I miss him ? - absolutely not.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
His limitations were laid bare this season.
He’s basically a poor man’s Mourinho - has an impact for a 18 months or so, then the rot sets in.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeremy corbyn
Not forgetting he saved us from probable relegation under Trollope.
In October?
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jeremy corbyn
Not forgetting he saved us from probable relegation under Trollope.
I think Solskjaer or Slade would have saved us from relegation from October that season. Whether Trollope would have relegated us is another story too. Trollope's problem was trying to implement a passing game with players that weren't good enough. That sounds familiar!
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Played the ‘little old Cardiff’ with a siege mentality card in the promotion season but that was all phoney and everyone knew it, we were as big and bigger than the majority of the division in bullying our way to promotion. Played the same card in the Premier League but this time he believed we were ‘little old Cardiff’, his previous Premiership experiences went before him. His whole body language changed, he’s just not a Premier League manager, he knows his limitations but his ego stopped him standing aside and letting us bring in an experienced man at that level. He couldn’t adapt in the way the likes of Sheffield United have this season, should have gone a lot earlier because as time goes on and things pan out at the club his standing and reputation among our fans will diminish. He gave us a great couple of seasons but he just couldn’t let go and we had nobody at the helm strong enough to push him.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
How come eddie Howe has been deemed a premiership manager and warnock isn't?
Warnock was very unlucky with Sheffield United and us , some of the refereeing decisions we had were appalling and if they had gone for us we would have stayed up
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
In October?
That side was going one place , division one
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
The way some people talk about Warnock shows a massive lack of class.
Yes he does some dodgy stuff - football is corrupt and people are out for themselves.
Some of his signings are a bit shit-show me a manager who hasn't got crap in.
Fulham spent a fortune and
He spent money- the success he brought to the club allowed the oppertunity to have this money.
Didn't play youngsters, the academy hasn't produced anything for years they aren't good enough.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SLUDGE FACTORY
That side was going one place , division one
I reckon if you asked Warnock to list his greatest managerial achievements, keeping us up in 16/17 would be nowhere - credit to him for bringing it out, but that squad was always too talented to go down.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
splott parker
Played the ‘little old Cardiff’ with a siege mentality card in the promotion season but that was all phoney and everyone knew it, we were as big and bigger than the majority of the division in bullying our way to promotion. Played the same card in the Premier League but this time he believed we were ‘little old Cardiff’, his previous Premiership experiences went before him. His whole body language changed, he’s just not a Premier League manager, he knows his limitations but his ego stopped him standing aside and letting us bring in an experienced man at that level. He couldn’t adapt in the way the likes of Sheffield United have this season, should have gone a lot earlier because as time goes on and things pan out at the club his standing and reputation among our fans will diminish. He gave us a great couple of seasons but he just couldn’t let go and we had nobody at the helm strong enough to push him.
:thumbup:
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SLUDGE FACTORY
How come eddie Howe has been deemed a premiership manager and warnock isn't?
Probably because Warnock has been either sacked or relegated in his 4 stints in the PL while Howe has kept Bournemouth up (and kept his job) in the four full seasons that he's been there.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
In October?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
Probably because Warnock has been either sacked or relegated in his 4 stints in the PL while Howe has kept Bournemouth up (and kept his job) in the four full seasons that he's been there.
Warnock has been unlucky
Have you seen a Serbian film
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SLUDGE FACTORY
How come eddie Howe has been deemed a premiership manager and warnock isn't?
Warnock was very unlucky with Sheffield United and us , some of the refereeing decisions we had were appalling and if they had gone for us we would have stayed up
Ones kept a team up and the other failed to keep 5 up.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SLUDGE FACTORY
How come eddie Howe has been deemed a premiership manager and warnock isn't?
Warnock was very unlucky with Sheffield United and us , some of the refereeing decisions we had were appalling and if they had gone for us we would have stayed up
Are you trying to suggest Warnock is as good a manager as Eddie Howe? :hehe: : hehe:
Warnock made far too many mistakes with us in the top flight. He wrote off every game against the big 6, bar the last meaningless one at Old Trafford. He failed to bring in a reasonable striker. The Rhys Healey substitution amongst others. There were lineups that he admitted he got wrong.
Thing is we almost stayed up. No point blaming referees when there are other significant cock ups on your own doorstep.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
splott parker
Played the ‘little old Cardiff’ with a siege mentality card in the promotion season but that was all phoney and everyone knew it, we were as big and bigger than the majority of the division in bullying our way to promotion. Played the same card in the Premier League but this time he believed we were ‘little old Cardiff’, his previous Premiership experiences went before him. His whole body language changed, he’s just not a Premier League manager, he knows his limitations but his ego stopped him standing aside and letting us bring in an experienced man at that level. He couldn’t adapt in the way the likes of Sheffield United have this season, should have gone a lot earlier because as time goes on and things pan out at the club his standing and reputation among our fans will diminish. He gave us a great couple of seasons but he just couldn’t let go and we had nobody at the helm strong enough to push him.
Spot on :thumbup:
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
He was what we needed until he wasn't. Then he just became a liability. It's hard to say at the moment whether overall he did more bad or good for City.
We have been in debt and unfashionable for the whole of the time I've watched them over the past 25 years or so. Probably have been most of our history.
We have also been outside of the top flight for all bar 2 of the years I've seen us.
How could he possibly have not done more good than bad?
At the very worst we are basically where we were after the last PL campaign.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
SLUDGE FACTORY
Warnock has been unlucky
Have you seen a Serbian film
I disagree, Sludge. Two relegations and two sackings can't be down to just bad luck.
Saw it. Hated it. Chuck 'Kill List' on your pile of films to watch. British psychological thriller.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trigger
We have been in debt and unfashionable for the whole of the time I've watched them over the past 25 years or so. Probably have been most of our history.
We have also been outside of the top flight for all bar 2 of the years I've seen us.
How could he possibly have not done more good than bad?
At the very worst we are basically where we were after the last PL campaign.
Warnock turned a side that was 23rd in the Championship into one that was 14th some 3 years and a month later when he left. Somehow I feel were in a worse position than we were under Solskjaer though with a better manager at this level.
-
Re: Warnock on sky sports
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
I reckon if you asked Warnock to list his greatest managerial achievements, keeping us up in 16/17 would be nowhere - credit to him for bringing it out, but that squad was always too talented to go down.
Thats a ridiculous comment. No squad is too talented to go down. No doubt you said the same thing in the past about Southampton, Leeds, Sunderland, Man City etc etc. Without Bamba, Hoilett and the total change in attitude and belief instilled by Warnock there is no doubt that we would have been in League One without him.