Phone hacks and hammer fights with a "friend" wearing underpants :sherlock:
Printable View
Phone hacks and hammer fights with a "friend" wearing underpants :sherlock:
I hear San Francisco has few popular gay bars and one can bump into some strange folk who may follow you home if your wife is not home with cable ties in tow..
There's a rumour going around that Liz sent an iPhone message to a counterpart in America, to inform them that "it's done". Surely it can't be true?
please elaborate wales bales i,m all ears ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63442813Quote:
Originally Posted by MOZZER2
It looks like the MSM has a different take on things ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcG0EfvqECQ
https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status...FPH9wT1VpxwRPg
How do the Russians know that the UK blew up the North Stream pipelines in partnership with the US?
Because @trussliz used her iPhone to send a message to @SecBlinken saying “It’s done” a minute after the pipeline blew up and before anybody else knew?
iCloud admin access rocks!
:facepalm:Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
https://twitter.com/mcfarlanedarren/...CzJfkUWC8q44IAQuote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
That country is sliding towards civil war.
Which one ?Quote:
Originally Posted by tforturton
Very interesting. Who is Derek Utley? I presume you believe what he is saying casting doubt on the rule of law version that some Qanon spiked up nudist went looking for Nancy with a hammer, otherwise why post it!
The plot thickens ...
NBC Just DELETED This Segment on New Paul Pelosi Details From Their Website
https://rumble.com/v1rjkrg-bizarre-n...si-attack.html
Body Cam Video Shows Paul Pelosi Opened Door for Police, Despite DOJ Saying Otherwise: Source
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investiga...ttack/3076235/
Every day when I wake up, I always feel thankful that we have Twitter, Youtube, NBCBayArea.com and Rumble.com as reliable news sources that we can all rely on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
What reliable news sources do you rely on then? Personally, I aggregate all of my sources, and the truth suddenly pops out. :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by superfeathers
A variety, but unless they cite and quote actual reliable sources then I tend to switch off.
That's where you are going wrong then! Trump Russia Collusion, Hunter's Laptop, etc., were all easy peasy nuts to crack. I suggest you get on Amazon for the Black Friday sale and buy yourself a new BS Meter :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by superfeathers
Yes you're right :hehe: I can never tell if you really believe some of this or if it's a parodyQuote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
The truth always comes out in the end, and the job of the media is to delay that eventuality. Once you realise this you will be able to put the likes of Lardy & Cyril to the sword on a regular basis :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by superfeathers
Interesting that you didn't answer, the plot thickens :sherlock:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
People respond to story telling and it's easy to fool people into believing all manner of things. You'd be surprised how much unfactual information resides in the average human brain.Quote:
Originally Posted by superfeathers
Message understood! Just be aware that there's a few others on here who seem to believe some of the conspiracies they post and not just doing it for a bit of funQuote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
I studied logic at university, so I understand the true/false/indeterminate nature of data. However, indeterminate data can tend towards true or false over time, when viewed alongside other associated data.Quote:
Originally Posted by superfeathers
How did the intruding break the glass from outside and find the glass outside as if it was broken form inside , police at high profile residence no body cams on wtf
Is it okay to say I dont like Nancy , she doesn't look right and her voice is scary as is her stare , along with her straw hair , and ageing teeth its spooky , is it true shes 130 ?
Wonder if Mr P was dabbling ?
Sometimes the truth really is stranger than fiction :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
[QUOTE=Wales-Bales;5364681]That's where you are going wrong then! Trump Russia Collusion, Hunter's Laptop, etc., were all easy peasy nuts to crack. I suggest you get on Amazon for the Black Friday sale and buy yourself a new BS Meter :biggrin:[/QUOTE
Can you give us some examples of what you mean by etc?
https://www.justsecurity.org/63838/g...-on-collusion/
https://www.politico.eu/article/muel...truction-line/
[QUOTE=the other bob wilson;5364907]I can't believe you are still clinging onto this! Enjoy the great reset, it was made for people like you :thumbup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Gluey has been waving 'Russia Collusion' around for years now as if it was rubbished by the Mueller investigation.
Some sort of 'gotchs' outcome.
It was nothing of the sort.
Trump, his circle and sections of the wider Republican Party were cleared of engaging in a criminal conspiracy with Russia - or rather there was insufficient evidence to meet the standard of proof needed to charge and prosecute.
But that was using 'collusion' in a narrow, technical way. The investigation racked up reams of proof that there was collaboration, co-operation and common interest - against a backdrop of hacks, leaks, and targeted attempts to influence the election outcome from St Petersburg troll and hack farms controlled by a close Putin ally.
Any rational reading of the Mueller investigation files is damning:
1. Trump was receptive to a Campaign national security adviser’s (George Papadopoulos) pursuit of a back channel to Putin.
2. Kremlin operatives provided the Campaign a preview of the Russian plan to distribute stolen emails.
3. The Trump Campaign chairman and deputy chairman (Paul Manafort and Rick Gates) knowingly shared internal polling data and information on battleground states with a Russian spy; and the Campaign chairman worked with the Russian spy on a pro-Russia “peace” plan for Ukraine.
4. The Trump Campaign chairman periodically shared internal polling data with the Russian spy with the expectation it would be shared with Putin-linked oligarch, Oleg Deripaska.
5. Trump Campaign chairman Manafort expected Trump’s winning the presidency would mean Deripaska would want to use Manafort to advance Deripaska’s interests in the United States and elsewhere.
6. Trump Tower meeting: (1) On receiving an email offering derogatory information on Clinton coming from a Russian government official, Donald Trump Jr. “appears to have accepted that offer;” (2) members of the Campaign discussed the Trump Tower meeting beforehand; (3) Donald Trump Jr. told the Russians during the meeting that Trump could revisit the issue of the Magnitsky Act if elected.
7. A Trump Campaign official told the Special Counsel he “felt obliged to object” to a GOP Platform change on Ukraine because it contradicted Trump’s wishes; however, the investigation did not establish that Gordon was directed by Trump.
8. Russian military hackers may have followed Trump’s July 27, 2016 public statement “Russia if you’re listening …” within hours by targeting Clinton’s personal office for the first time.
9. Trump requested campaign affiliates to get Clinton’s emails, which resulted in an individual apparently acting in coordination with the Campaign claiming to have successfully contacted Russian hackers.
10. The Trump Campaign—and Trump personally—appeared to have advanced knowledge of future WikiLeaks releases.
11. The Trump Campaign coordinated campaign-related public communications based on future WikiLeaks releases.
12. Michael Cohen, on behalf of the Trump Organization, brokered a secret deal for a Trump Tower Moscow project directly involving Putin’s inner circle, at least until June 2016.
13. During the presidential transition, Jared Kushner and Eric Prince engaged in secret back channel communications with Russian agents. (1) Kushner suggested to the Russian Ambassador that they use a secure communication line from within the Russian Embassy to speak with Russian Generals; and (2) Prince and Kushner’s friend Rick Gerson conducted secret back channel meetings with a Putin agent to develop a plan for U.S.-Russian relations.
14. During the presidential transition, in coordination with other members of the Transition Team, Michael Flynn spoke with the Russian Ambassador to prevent a tit for tat Russian response to the Obama administration’s imposition of sanctions for election interference; the Russians agreed not to retaliate saying they wanted a good relationship with the incoming administration.
If that is the 'Russia Collusion Hoax' that Gluey keeps shouting about, it still looks pretty convincing to me!
:facepalm:Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1959
Are you going to do a rewrite on the weapons of mass destruction next? :hehe:
No. Why do you ask?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
There were no weapons of mass destruction. Blair and Bush lied to justify an illegal war.
Trump and the Republicans were on the same page as Putin - with many shared objectives - just not 'colluding' to the extent that a criminal conspiracy charge could be brought.
Let me know if you need that to be explained further. :hehe:
The person feeding all the dossier nonsense to Steele was an FBI informant who was on their payroll, so they already knew the allegations consisted or made-up BS before a special counsel was even appointed.Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1959
The Steele Dossier may have been a complete invention - or at least much of it may have been an invention.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
The mutual admiration between Trump and Putin, the back channel contacts, the record of collaboration (including real estate money laundering deals) and the activities of St Petersburg based troll farms to aid Trump's election campaign are not an invention.
Attachment 5305
But hey, 'Russia Collusion Hoax!' MAGA MAGA MAGA!
I hope you and your fellow conspiracy theorists will consider donating your brains to medical science one day, as I feel there may be a great discovery awaiting us :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by jon1959
Is that all you've got? :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
My opinions ar3 based on the findings of the Mueller Report, no more than that - you’re the flart earther here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
The Mueller Report was based on made-up nonsense, and it was nothing more than a political hit job. That's not to say it wasn't interesting, as we inadvertently learned quite a bit about the dubious elements of US statecraft.Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
If it was made up nonsense, why have you seized upon it continuously as a justification for your no collusion onslaught in recent years?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/01...eillance-videoQuote:
Originally Posted by life on mars
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b2270904.html
Another conspiracy case study bites the dust.
WalesBales starts with a bit of innuendo he picked up off Musk and others in his tinfoil twittersphere.
LoM in a rush to curry favour, sprinkled over unfounded nonsense with additional homophobic and mysogynistic overtones.
The reality, that a deranged conspiracist, dining on the same diet that WB and others get their unique insight, smashed his way in with a hammer, hit Paul Pelosi on the head with it and confessed to wanting to cause severe physical harm to Nancy Pelosi and others couldn't possibly be true because the people who manipulate their thoughts into their own said otherwise.
People like WalesBales and LoM should be ashamed of their snide contributions but facts will just slide off their slopey shoulders.