-
Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Manager clearly doesn't fancy them at the moment. Given the bits and pieces I've seen of them this season, cant say I'm surprised.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Davies has played 224 minutes across 7 games so far, and at least 45 of them were running a Prem team ragged... some of our fanbase have such a bizarre fixation on dumping on our young players, it's absolutely bizarre
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LA Bluebird
Davies has played 224 minutes across 7 games so far, and at least 45 of them were running a Prem team ragged... some of our fanbase have such a bizarre fixation on dumping on our young players, it's absolutely bizarre
Davies ran Leeds ragged? OK.....
You can't blame the fans for the fact that Colwill and Davies aren't in the squad. That's down to the manager and his coaching staff.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LA Bluebird
Davies has played 224 minutes across 7 games so far, and at least 45 of them were running a Prem team ragged... some of our fanbase have such a bizarre fixation on dumping on our young players, it's absolutely bizarre
Spot on. I've seen and heard people say that relying on Davies & Colwill is the reason we're in a mess, they've barely played! The amount of stick they and Mark Harris get is absurd, Colwill and Harris in particular.
It doesn't surprise me that Lamouchi is going with more tried and tested players mind, both Colwill & Davies have had injury hit seasons and missed large chunks of pre-season, we don't have the time to get players up to speed. I am still a little baffled by Davies and Harris' exclusion in favour of 2 big lumps on the bench, they at least offer something different in terms of mobility. There's very little pace in the side today.
I think the best thing for Colwill now would be to have no international call up (senior or u21) and stay training with the club and hopefully get back in the squad after the international break, same for Davies if he still qualifies for the u21s
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUEAWAY
Not getting a sniff.
The Colwill situation has tested the deductive skills of this message board's top sleuths but none of them have reached a definitive conclusion.
Your message has me wondering whether the problem is off-field and might involve what 'sniff' is a slang word for.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Lone Gunman
Davies ran Leeds ragged? OK.....
You can't blame the fans for the fact that Colwill and Davies aren't in the squad. That's down to the manager and his coaching staff.
He was very good in the home game, taking him off for Tanner was a terrible decision by Hudson and probably lost us the tie
Where in their post are they blaming the fans for Colwill & Davies not being in the squad?
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Davies I’m surprised by, I’d have his pace on the bench every time.
Colwill I just just don’t think makes it, looks lost for any kind of form whenever I’ve seen him since he came back from injury.
Both need to do more in the U21s and make a case for being first team players atm.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
We've had a succession that don't seem to fancy them. It's hard not to draw conclusions.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Was with Isaaks dad earlier, he’s not injured
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
We know Lamouchi likes a big guy upfront but I’m surprised Isaak isn’t on the bench as a pace
Option. Kaba and Etete are identical.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
J R Hartley
Was with Isaaks dad earlier, he’s not injured
Got a good family around him from what I c an see. Used to sit next to his grandad in the family stand. Nice bloke.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
J R Hartley
We know Lamouchi likes a big guy upfront but I’m surprised Isaak isn’t on the bench as a pace
Option. Kaba and Etete are identical.
I’d put Davies in the side before either of these. They just don’t have it.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
J R Hartley
We know Lamouchi likes a big guy upfront but I’m surprised Isaak isn’t on the bench as a pace
Option. Kaba and Etete are identical.
Yeah I really don't see the point having both on the bench. It doesn't help that neither are particularly good either.
I saw a picture from Carrow Road with Tom Sang in it so I'm guessing he's the "spare" on away trips? Baffling to have him and Whyte ahead of Davies
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
Got a good family around him from what I c a see. Used to sit next to his grandad in the family stand. Nice bloke.
Don’t know his grandad but his old man is as sound as they come.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
City123
Yeah I really don't see the point having both on the bench. It doesn't help that neither are particularly good either.
I saw a picture from Carrow Road with Tom Sang in it so I'm guessing he's the "spare" on away trips? Baffling to have him and Whyte ahead of Davies
Perhaps Davies isn’t impressing Lamouchi in training? He plays Etete and Philogene, so he’s clearly not a manager who doesn’t want to use youngsters in his team.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Lone Gunman
Perhaps Davies isn’t impressing Lamouchi in training? He plays Etete and Philogene, so he’s clearly not a manager who doesn’t want to use youngsters in his team.
Something is amiss, certainly. Didn't we turn down a couple of million for him pre season and quite a few thought he was worth more than that. Either way, Davies of last season was a far better player than Philogene this season, if not as skillful at times, but much more consistent and harder working.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Eric the Half a Bee
Something is amiss, certainly. Didn't we turn down a couple of million for him pre season and quite a few thought he was worth more than that. Either way, Davies of last season was a far better player than Philogene this season, if not as skillful at times, but much more consistent and harder working.
I think Philogene's 'work-rate' has got better and stronger as the season goes on. He's got a huge amount to learn still and consistency will come with that but he's still a kid himself. I'm not sure It's fair to say Davies is more consistent than him, we've barely seen him.
I'd have Davies in the squad every time but I think Philogene gets an unjustified hard time of it on occasions.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
It would be good if a journalist asked what each of them needs to do to make the match day squad. It's not as if the manager is fixated on three workers in central midfield (hopefully the manager learnt his lesson yesterday and we don't see that midfield again) or always playing two target strikers, so both would fit in to our current way of playing.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
City123
Where in their post are they blaming the fans for Colwill & Davies not being in the squad?
I guess I misinterpreted what LA Bluebird was trying to say.
Thing is, I don't think there's any doubt that Colwill has been a major disappointment this season. Most of us had reasonably high hopes for him going into the campaign, but he hasn't really taken any of the chances he's been given. I don't believe anyone among the fanbase wants him to fail, but thus far he's had a season to forget to put it kindly.
Here's a strange stat: Colwill has started three Championship games so far this season. All have ended in 0-0 draws (Preston and QPR at home, Coventry away).
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Lone Gunman
Perhaps Davies isn’t impressing Lamouchi in training? He plays Etete and Philogene, so he’s clearly not a manager who doesn’t want to use youngsters in his team.
Possibly, but I find it strange to have two very similar strikers on the bench in Etete & Kaba when there are other options, like Davies & Harris, in the squad who can offer some pace going forward. There's no real way for us to change the game going forward with those 2 replacing Wickham. It doesn't help that both aren't especially good at using their size and don't tend to trouble defenders
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Lone Gunman
I guess I misinterpreted what LA Bluebird was trying to say.
Thing is, I don't think there's any doubt that Colwill has been a major disappointment this season. Most of us had reasonably high hopes for him going into the campaign, but he hasn't really taken any of the chances he's been given. I don't believe anyone among the fanbase wants him to fail, but thus far he's had a season to forget to put it kindly.
Here's a strange stat: Colwill has started three Championship games so far this season. All have ended in 0-0 draws (Preston and QPR at home, Coventry away).
He has been disappointing, though whilst your last stat is interesting it does show why I feel some of the criticism he gets off fans is unwarranted. He hasn't really had a run of games, he's started back to back games just once and has played for more than half an hour just 5 times this season.
Injuries haven't helped him and having seen him in the u21s recently his confidence seems to have gone completely, that being said he hasn't taken his chances, but the chances he's had have been fleeting. I think the boy clearly has talent, one a couple of occasions after coming on he's looked our best player and really helped us going forward but he's not really been afforded the chance to grow into games like some of our other players have. Plenty of other players in the side have been poor all season but allowed runs of games to try and turn it around, that hasn't really happened for Colwill for one reason or another
I think there's certainly elements of the fanbase revelling in the "I told you so" nature of certain things failing (just look at some of the posters here) and I think that does extend to the young players who, in my view, do get far more of the blame and far more criticism than they deserve
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
City123
He has been disappointing, though whilst your last stat is interesting it does show why I feel some of the criticism he gets off fans is unwarranted. He hasn't really had a run of games, he's started back to back games just once and has played for more than half an hour just 5 times this season.
Injuries haven't helped him and having seen him in the u21s recently his confidence seems to have gone completely, that being said he hasn't taken his chances, but the chances he's had have been fleeting. I think the boy clearly has talent, one a couple of occasions after coming on he's looked our best player and really helped us going forward but he's not really been afforded the chance to grow into games like some of our other players have. Plenty of other players in the side have been poor all season but allowed runs of games to try and turn it around, that hasn't really happened for Colwill for one reason or another
I think there's certainly elements of the fanbase revelling in the "I told you so" nature of certain things failing (just look at some of the posters here) and I think that does extend to the young players who, in my view, do get far more of the blame and far more criticism than they deserve
Why would people revel in things failing?
I just think we rushed through some of the kids and some aren't up to this level. If they are then great but people can give opinions on it.
The sad part in all of this is the positives are few and far between. Our owners and board get a lot more wrong than they get right.
Would we want talented youngsters breaking through most seasons? Of course we would.
As I said at the time though Tan and his master plan seemed to think the way to go was to throw kids in, ready or not. It didn't mean they were ready though. Look at yesterday's starting line up and most this season. Hardly any of them feature and there has to be a reason for that. I don't think they are easily good enough but every manager that hasn't picked them has some unjustified issue with them, let's put it that way.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
City123
He has been disappointing, though whilst your last stat is interesting it does show why I feel some of the criticism he gets off fans is unwarranted. He hasn't really had a run of games, he's started back to back games just once and has played for more than half an hour just 5 times this season.
Injuries haven't helped him and having seen him in the u21s recently his confidence seems to have gone completely, that being said he hasn't taken his chances, but the chances he's had have been fleeting. I think the boy clearly has talent, one a couple of occasions after coming on he's looked our best player and really helped us going forward but he's not really been afforded the chance to grow into games like some of our other players have. Plenty of other players in the side have been poor all season but allowed runs of games to try and turn it around, that hasn't really happened for Colwill for one reason or another
I think there's certainly elements of the fanbase revelling in the "I told you so" nature of certain things failing (just look at some of the posters here) and I think that does extend to the young players who, in my view, do get far more of the blame and far more criticism than they deserve
There's a problem with Colwill's game in my opinion. I know that plenty others have been shit, but they have a back record of being able to perform to some standard at this level, so, rightly or wrongly, he has to prove himself because his credit score is low, that's football unfortunately. Take a look at the young players who have come through over the past 20 years or so, they were all at least on a par or better than what we had at the time. Collins, Earnshaw, Gunter, Ledley, Ramsey, Jerome, Ralls, even as far back as Blake, they all came in and made a difference. Colwill and whoever else do have to look better than what we have, because what is the point in developing them if they're on a par with what we already have? This argument which says that the others are shit so why shouldn't colwill be the same is crazy. We wouldn't afford that luxury on any player at any age above 20 if they were given the opportunity to play in the first team, and colwill isthe same, he has to be better than the others, that's the whole point i think.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tuerto
There's a problem with Colwill's game in my opinion. I know that plenty others have been shit, but they have a back record of being able to perform to some standard at this level, so, rightly or wrongly, he has to prove himself because his credit score is low, that's football unfortunately. Take a look at the young players who have come through over the past 20 years or so, they were all at least on a par or better than what we had at the time. Collins, Earnshaw, Gunter, Ledley, Ramsey, Jerome, Ralls, even as far back as Blake, they all came in and made a difference. Colwill and whoever else do have to look better than what we have, because what is the point in developing them if they're on a par with what we already have? This argument which says that the others are shit so why shouldn't colwill be the same is crazy. We wouldn't afford that luxury on any player at any age above 20 if they were given the opportunity to play in the first team, and colwill isthe same, he has to be better than the others, that's the whole point i think.
:thumbup:
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
City123
He has been disappointing, though whilst your last stat is interesting it does show why I feel some of the criticism he gets off fans is unwarranted. He hasn't really had a run of games, he's started back to back games just once and has played for more than half an hour just 5 times this season.
I take onboard all of your points and agree with plenty of them, but here’s another interesting stat - City have scored just one goal while Colwill’s been on the pitch this season. That was Sawyers’ late goal in the home defeat to Luton back in August.
I can’t see Colwill featuring much between now and the end of the season as Lamouchi doesn’t seem too keen on him. Maybe a loan spell somewhere next season is the way to go as he definitely appears to have gone backwards this season.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dembethewarrior
:thumbup:
This is high end work Delm, it's not someone like me who pushes shit up a wall, i can be replaced by someone as ordinary and as average as me. We are talking pro football, elite level employment, surely someone coming in has to be better, surely someone who has been developed has to be better? Otherwise what's the point in developing players, we could go out and pick up other teams cast offs and they could be as mediocre as the rest of them. :thumbup:
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tuerto
There's a problem with Colwill's game in my opinion. I know that plenty others have been shit, but they have a back record of being able to perform to some standard at this level, so, rightly or wrongly, he has to prove himself because his credit score is low, that's football unfortunately. Take a look at the young players who have come through over the past 20 years or so, they were all at least on a par or better than what we had at the time. Collins, Earnshaw, Gunter, Ledley, Ramsey, Jerome, Ralls, even as far back as Blake, they all came in and made a difference. Colwill and whoever else do have to look better than what we have, because what is the point in developing them if they're on a par with what we already have? This argument which says that the others are shit so why shouldn't colwill be the same is crazy. We wouldn't afford that luxury on any player at any age above 20 if they were given the opportunity to play in the first team, and colwill isthe same, he has to be better than the others, that's the whole point i think.
Colwill does have some kind of track record at this level, a better one than, for instance Philogene who has been given plenty of games to prove himself this season. He has a better record than the continually ineffective Gavin Whyte who is seemingly ahead of him in the pecking order. Ojo's best season is 5 goals as a 23 year old, the same Colwill managed last season in his first full season in the first team squad. We have very few players in the squad who I would say are proven good Championship players.
Colwil's goals did make a difference last season. He won the game at Forest, scored the winner at QPR, opened the scoring in a win at Luton and sparked the comeback at Stoke. That's not bad going in what was a poor side.
There are problems with Colwill's game, I don't think anybody's saying otherwise, but if I was a manager looking to change the game would I rather have Colwill or Gavin Whyte and Tom Sang staring back at me? The same goes for Davies. It baffles me why you'd have 2 very similar attacking options on the bench when there are players in the squad who offer something different. Grant Hanley has over 300 Championship/PL appearances under his belt, Kaba and Etete aren't going to trouble him and, unsurprisingly, they didn't. Surely Davies' speed is a better option than to have than both of them?
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
Why would people revel in things failing?
I just think we rushed through some of the kids and some aren't up to this level. If they are then great but people can give opinions on it.
The sad part in all of this is the positives are few and far between. Our owners and board get a lot more wrong than they get right.
Would we want talented youngsters breaking through most seasons? Of course we would.
As I said at the time though Tan and his master plan seemed to think the way to go was to throw kids in, ready or not. It didn't mean they were ready though. Look at yesterday's starting line up and most this season. Hardly any of them feature and there has to be a reason for that. I don't think they are easily good enough but every manager that hasn't picked them has some unjustified issue with them, let's put it that way.
There have been plenty of posts just on here all season of posters revelling in our move away from hoofball not particularly working out the way some had hoped
You say we rushed players through, but did any of the kids we gave debuts to look particularly out of place? The one I can think of is Zimba at Stoke and perhaps Bowen at Forest (though he looked good when we hosted Reading), but beyond that nobody looked out of place as far as I can recall and there were often comments from opposition supporters that they looked like our better players
I know you like to blame Tan for everything but that's quite the stretch and a little contradictory. If there was some directive from the top to play these players then why haven't they really featured much at all? You've claimed previously that Tan meddles in the starting XI, so if he does and the promotion of youth is down to him why haven't any of these players really had a run of games at any point?
We haven't "thrown the kids in" at all. Last season the only one of our under 21s to start more than half of our league games was McGuinness, followed by Bagan with 22 starts. Davies started 10 games and Colwill 15. That isn't throwing the kids in at all but pretty standard stuff. This is something I tried to get at earlier in the thread, there seems to be a narrative developing whereby our issues are down to playing too many youngsters who aren't up to it, that's just not the case. Our issues stem from complete misuse of our parachute payments, poor appointments and an absentee board that don't have a serious plan in place which see us lurch from manager to manager picking up more and more bang average journeymen we've used 33 players this season, 28 in the league. That's staggering.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
City123
Colwill does have some kind of track record at this level, a better one than, for instance Philogene who has been given plenty of games to prove himself this season. He has a better record than the continually ineffective Gavin Whyte who is seemingly ahead of him in the pecking order. Ojo's best season is 5 goals as a 23 year old, the same Colwill managed last season in his first full season in the first team squad. We have very few players in the squad who I would say are proven good Championship players.
Colwil's goals did make a difference last season. He won the game at Forest, scored the winner at QPR, opened the scoring in a win at Luton and sparked the comeback at Stoke. That's not bad going in what was a poor side.
There are problems with Colwill's game, I don't think anybody's saying otherwise, but if I was a manager looking to change the game would I rather have Colwill or Gavin Whyte and Tom Sang staring back at me? The same goes for Davies. It baffles me why you'd have 2 very similar attacking options on the bench when there are players in the squad who offer something different. Grant Hanley has over 300 Championship/PL appearances under his belt, Kaba and Etete aren't going to trouble him and, unsurprisingly, they didn't. Surely Davies' speed is a better option than to have than both of them?
Fair enough, so what is it then? Why have a succession of managers ignored Colwill? Lets say that he is better than the players you mentioned, why isn't he being afforded his chance to show his ability? I'm no expert, but i really think it's how colwill plays. If he isn't on the ball looking forward then he can be a liability, more so than the other players mentioned in my opinion. He may be better in posession than the others, but the rest of his game is poor, so what do you do in that situation-Start a player who is good at one thing, or start a player who is average at four aspects of the game? Because i really do believe that is how this situation with colwill is being looked at. He is poor out of possession, doesn't use his size well, positionally he suffers, poor in the tackle. He's decent with his head up, only my opinion, and it may well be bollocks, but i so believe that his non selection is due to his all round game being poor, which means that the one thing that he is good at has to be so influential and productive that it overides the poor aspects of his game, and as it stands, it isn't. In my opinion.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
From what I've seen of Rubin he's been out wide this season.Really.I would like to see him in the no 10 roll.
At least as a sub in the last 30 minutes.
The manager did say that both Davies and Colwill get knocked off the ball to easy.
We've a new fitness coach lets hope there's a lot going on behind the scenes in regards to building them up.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
City123
There have been plenty of posts just on here all season of posters revelling in our move away from hoofball not particularly working out the way some had hoped
You say we rushed players through, but did any of the kids we gave debuts to look particularly out of place? The one I can think of is Zimba at Stoke and perhaps Bowen at Forest (though he looked good when we hosted Reading), but beyond that nobody looked out of place as far as I can recall and there were often comments from opposition supporters that they looked like our better players
I know you like to blame Tan for everything but that's quite the stretch and a little contradictory. If there was some directive from the top to play these players then why haven't they really featured much at all? You've claimed previously that Tan meddles in the starting XI, so if he does and the promotion of youth is down to him why haven't any of these players really had a run of games at any point?
We haven't "thrown the kids in" at all. Last season the only one of our under 21s to start more than half of our league games was McGuinness, followed by Bagan with 22 starts. Davies started 10 games and Colwill 15. That isn't throwing the kids in at all but pretty standard stuff. This is something I tried to get at earlier in the thread, there seems to be a narrative developing whereby our issues are down to playing too many youngsters who aren't up to it, that's just not the case. Our issues stem from complete misuse of our parachute payments, poor appointments and an absentee board that don't have a serious plan in place which see us lurch from manager to manager picking up more and more bang average journeymen we've used 33 players this season, 28 in the league. That's staggering.
People on here suggest playing actual football doesn't work. It does. It's been proven time and again. What doesn't work is spending pennies on players, throwing a manager who is out of his depth in the mix and saying 'start playing more football'. It is a recipe for disaster. Most can see that but it seemed to be another light bulb moment from Tan.
Did any kids look out of their depth? Yes, most of them. Where are most of them now? They're certainly not starting for City or featuring much. Why not?
There are two lines of thought on the kids that suddenly started coming in to the team under McCarthy. There was either an embarrassment of riches at Under 21 level that managers prior to them just refused to pick or Tan wanted to save money and wanted to use them no matter what to save money.
The season we threw kids in was during McCarthy's time. The vast majority of them are not in the match day squad.
I know what I think. If there was this insane amount of talent then where are they because they're certainly not making a difference for City come game day?
I also see you mention McGuinness, you're not suggesting he is a City product surely?
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dandywarhol
From what I've seen of Rubin he's been out wide this season.Really.I would like to see him in the no 10 roll.
At least as a sub in the last 30 minutes.
The manager did say that both Davies and Colwill get knocked off the ball to easy.
We've a new fitness coach lets hope there's a lot going on behind the scenes in regards to building them up.
They put inexperienced players out wide as mistakes aren't as costly.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Bowen, King, Zimba, Denham, Kieron Evans plus the two mentioned all given game time after a certain time during the season (one or two had been given game time prior to this, just highlighting how many kids we put in) and people believe that McCarthy just suddenly thought these players are better than what we have and he wasn't told to play the kids?
As I've asked previously where are most of them?
Most haven't made it. We threw in kids and most weren't up to it.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
Bowen, King, Zimba, Denham, Kieron Evans plus the two mentioned all given game time after a certain time during the season (one or two had been given game time prior to this, just highlighting how many kids we put in) and people believe that McCarthy just suddenly thought these players are better than what we have and he wasn't told to play the kids?
King got ten minutes in McCarthy’s last game. Zumba and Denham made their debuts under Morison.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Lone Gunman
King got ten minutes in McCarthy’s last game. Zumba and Denham made their debuts under Morison.
Same question remains. Where are they?
Some people believe the majority of these players were picked because they were good enough and ready. I'm not sure they were. I believe it is another sign of Tan being unwilling to spend what he once did and making some comment to the manager about using the kids.
It wouldn't surprise me if McCarthy and the bizarre 5 centre halves being picked was a reaction to some Tan advice. I don't know for certain obviously but it would not surprise me.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
Same question remains. Where are they?
20 year-old King is on loan at Crewe, playing regularly. Denham I don’t know, think he’s been injured. Zimba, who played a grand total of 45 mins under Morison, had a loan spell at Newport but is now back.
Google is your friend. Don’t be scared of it.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
The Lone Gunman
20 year-old King is on loan at Crewe, playing regularly. Denham I do t know, think he’s been injured. Zimba, who played a grand total of 45 mins under Morison, had a loan spell at Newport but is now back.
Google is your friend. Don’t be scared of it.
They're not featuring for City then?
Why do I need Google when you do it for me?
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
We can go around the houses all day.
As a club we're nowhere near good enough at producing talent that features in the first team and improves it.
-
Re: Davies, Colwill, Are they injured?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blue lewj
They're not featuring for City then?
Why do I need Google when you do it for me?
Well done you. I’ll leave it there as I have no idea what you’re gibbering about. This thread was about first team squad members Colwill and Davies, but you’ve tried to turn it another tiresome anti-Tan platform. I should have known better than to engage.