Printable View
IMO yes as long as his role is creative rather than defensive.
He appears to be a 60 minute player - I’d settle for that if he makes a real contribution during that time.
Inevitably he will be considered to be a high earner which will soon become a burden if he is injured too much, doesn’t play well or is the best of a poor bunch.
On balance - yes. His signing would also add momentum and hope.
yes, of course, there isn't a team in the division that wouldn't want him
Yes. End of thread.
Unless it is sucking resource from the badly needed wider squad rebuilding job, I can't see any downside in having such an iconic player back.Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUEAWAY
Well Dylan Levitt has signed for Hibs so it’s not a bad plan B.
exactly, anyone who says differently is crazyQuote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
Rambo, get the pen out and sign your name :thumbup:
😂😂😂Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
🤣🤣🤣Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
Is signing for Hibs really more attractive and lucrative than signing for City?
Would it be good to sign Messi?
It's the safer option.Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCBlue
Gutting to miss out on a legend like Levitt.Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
Yes.
Given we aren't allowed to spend any money, so couldn't sign Levitt it is the only option!Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCBlue
No, an expensive luxury when this season we may struggle more than last.
Anyone who says no is surely just being a try hard?
No reason at all to not want it
I'd assumed the fact that he was being mentioned meant he was a free agent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa
From what I’ve seen of the SPL over the yrs, I’d say it’s on a par with the Championship.Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCBlue
In the games I saw Ramsey play for Rangers, he wasn’t exactly a stand out player.
If there is more than just a bit of interest on both sides then they need to get on with it
If he wants to sign and we want him to sign for christ sake get on with it
It's torture reading all the nonsense on here and other Internet sites
It's like pulling teeth or getting blood from a stone
Get on with it and stop fannying about
Absolute no brainer, will build feel good factor, improve our first 11 and also the fringe/youth players who get to learn off someone who's played at the top level for the past 10-15 years.
In terms of revenue, we'd likely see an increase in tickets/shirts that would be the equivalent of 5-10k a week to cover some of his wages.
The thing is it's not like we have a full squad and he is a pure extra cost, for example we'd likely be spending 10k+ a week on an average championship player instead if he wasn't to sign
No. Too injury prone- expensive luxury to have in the treatment room
cant beat a good schooling with amazing international coaches :biggrin:Quote:
Originally Posted by J R Hartley
Just to bring the Welsh lads, influence the squad will look up too . Play odd game , tgen become a coach for us .
Is the Pope a catholic?
Obviously.
Who out of the rest of our midfield would have had 35 games if they had been at Nice last season?
no brainer for me Phil - still ooses class
Exactly, even at 32 he's a couple of levels above Wintle, Ralls etcQuote:
Originally Posted by Rjk
People seem to be forgetting how poor we were last season, Ramsey walks into that side (and probably every other Championship team)
yep- Ross Barkley was also at Nice last season, I wonder where he will end upQuote:
Originally Posted by City123
It would be really good, for a number of reasons.