Re: Looking ominous in the Ryder Cup.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MacAdder
I thought it was pretty obvious what I meant but having seen your sharp reply, accompanied by a load of question marks when, if it was a simple question you were asking, one would have been necessary, then I naturally assumed you took up a contrary position.
It wasn't meant to be a sharp reply, that would have been exclamation marks, just thought that shocker was way over the top, at least until the inevitable post mortem into all the reasons why it happened.
As I think I made plain on my other post doesn't by any stretch of the imagination mean that he doesn't have questions to answer.
Re: Looking ominous in the Ryder Cup.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Elwood Blues
It wasn't meant to be a sharp reply, that would have been exclamation marks, just thought that shocker was way over the top, at least until the inevitable post mortem into all the reasons why it happened.
As I think I made plain on my other post doesn't by any stretch of the imagination mean that he doesn't have questions to answer.
Fair dinkum it seems we share some common ground.