Poor Le Tizz has been cancelled , brilliant example of closing down debate and different views by personal attacks
Printable View
Poor Le Tizz has been cancelled , brilliant example of closing down debate and different views by personal attacks
If the media coverage was fair and impartial, very few accusations of “misinformation spreading”would occur. Credible reporting would crush any falsehoods. It is a testimony to just how little the public actually know probably is one of the main reasons that such brutal accusations continue.
This has been the case for quite some time.
Climate change and the pandemic is the same.
What was cancelled, by whom and why?
I read the report that he had posted some fake news (trying to undermine reports of Russian atrocities in Ukraine), got called out for it, deleted it and stepped aside as a Saints Ambassador as a result.
Which bits did you see were brilliant examples of closing down debate and different views by personal attack? What examples of fake nonsense do you want spread more widely as a result?
I saw LeTissier described in a magazine article as the sort of libertarian who wants the freedom to do what he likes no matter what the consequences of that were to others - would have thought that was pretty bleeding obvious actually and rather comes with the territory with those who identify with the term.
How is debate being closed down? He can still talk as much as he wants, Southampton just don't agree with his views so don't want to associate themselves with him. Perfect example of the right to free speech at work - free speech doesn't mean free speech without consequences, some righty snowflakes seem to forget that
The people who talk most about free speech don't really know what it means. I'm sure if i did a search on "free speech" on ccmb, three quarters of the posts would be getting it wrong, thinking that it means they should be insulated from being told they're talking rubbish.
On a scale of 1 to 10, how wrong is he?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYLqJ3h9KQw
Such a natural talented footballer , have a look on the Internet thingy at his goals , some were mesmerising , never sold out and went for big bucks club ,wasn't picked enough for England ...
In tomorrows episode of the Philosophical Footballer, Jamie Vardy ponders on the iniquity of the libel and offside laws.
Always cracks me up how these “independent, critical” thinkers all think exactly the same thing.
Do you mean those influenced by the opinions they read in, say, the Daily Express or those influenced by, say, the opinions in the Guardian or are you saying that there is no difference between the opinions in the two papers?
See, your flippant remark is, like most of your flippant remarks, complete bollox. The fact of the matter is that, in my experience, if someone calls themselves an “independent, critical thinker” you can be 99.9 per cent sure of what they’re going to say on certain subjects before you actually read/hear it.