Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Smithies
Drameh
McGuinness
Flint or Nelson
Ng
Ralls
Colwill
Vaulks
Sang or Doyle
Harris
Davies
Subs
Phillips
Moore
Nelson or Flint
Sang or Doyle
Wintle
Collins
Watters
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUEAWAY
Smithies
Drameh
McGuinness
Flint or Nelson
Ng
Ralls
Colwill
Vaulks
Sang or Doyle
Harris
Davies
Subs
Phillips
Moore
Nelson or Flint
Sang or Doyle
Wintle
Collins
Watters
Take out Vaulks for Wintle
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
If it's a passing game, I'd have Pack in for Vaulks. And I'm not sure we could get away only one from Flint and Nelson.
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Phillips
Ng McGuiness Panzo
Drameh Wintle Doyle Giles
Colwill Davies
Moore
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Ratcliffe
Ng
Pack
McGuinness
Drameh
Ralls
Bowen
Wintle
Bagan
Moore
Colwill
Think we’d probably end up lower in the table than we are now if we played that team every week mind :hehe:
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
Ratcliffe
Ng
Pack
McGuinness
Drameh
Ralls
Bowen
Wintle
Bagan
Moore
Colwill
Think we’d probably end up lower in the table than we are now if we played that team every week mind :hehe:
Took me a good 30 seconds to work out Bagan is playing LWB in that formation not as a number 10 :hehe:
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
formation?
4:4:2
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUEAWAY
4:4:2
I hate it
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NYCBlue
If it's a passing game, I'd have Pack in for Vaulks. And I'm not sure we could get away only one from Flint and Nelson.
The problem with Pack is that he plays to deep and he is much more inclined to pass backwards than forwards.
It was interesting hearing Ledley being quite critical of Pack on Saturday.
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUEAWAY
The problem with Pack is that he plays to deep and he is much more inclined to pass backwards than forwards.
It was interesting hearing Ledley being quite critical of Pack on Saturday.
He is frustrating as he can pass very well I remember his debut he was more up top and I though hello he looks half decent ( then he went off injured I think ? )
I don't dislike him as at time he does bring a cool head to the game but is prone to loosing the ball with forward passing / movement , yes he does pass pass more sideways and back however isn't that the tactic that has been placed at his door .
The other thing for Ledley and other to consider the way we poorly defend I think creates the style he adopts ie safety ball
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUEAWAY
The problem with Pack is that he plays to deep and he is much more inclined to pass backwards than forwards.
It was interesting hearing Ledley being quite critical of Pack on Saturday.
pack has been a big problem for me this season.
he's the only midfield who will consistently sit in front of the defence, and his passing accuracy is actually not bad, but his speed of thought and execution isn't great these days, when him, flint and Nelson get a little triangle going it's excruciating to watch, we go nowhere and the defence just gets set and starts to press us.
so many times an early ball from pack might have set us going on the attack but he hasn't noticed it until it is too late.
the only problem is prior to Wintle coming back ,none of the other midfielders actually play that role even as well as him, vaulks and ralls get dragged out if position too much
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BLUEAWAY
Smithies
Drameh
McGuinness
Flint or Nelson
Ng
Ralls
Colwill
Vaulks
Sang or Doyle
Harris
Davies
Subs
Phillips
Moore
Nelson or Flint
Sang or Doyle
Wintle
Collins
Watters
You'd start Vaulks? Steve, is that you?
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
I'm hopeful that Wintle's defensive abilities will help to stem the flow of goals we concede. That's providing he's played as a defensive midfielder, of course. And if he plays, then Pack has to be dropped - they are the same sort of player.
Re: Based on a passing game rather than hoofball would this team work?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tforturton
I'm hopeful that Wintle's defensive abilities will help to stem the flow of goals we concede. That's providing he's played as a defensive midfielder, of course. And if he plays, then Pack has to be dropped - they are the same sort of player.
some teams play with a double pivot, to allow the wingbacks and 2 #10s to really get forward to support the attack.
Wintle and pack might make a good pair.
I'd prefer Wintle and ralls, but ralls does like to get more forward
