Sorry I had forgotten his calligrapher.
I wonder if, like Henry VIII hes has a " Groom of the Stool" as well!
Printable View
Come on now, all will be revealed after the senior civil servant's review.
We are all jumping the gun :facepalm:
Sir Kier missed a trick not asking him if he'd lied to the house.
He Johnson couldn't have hid behind the "wait til the findings of the review " comment.
Can't see the backbenchers taking much more brassnecking.
The end is nigh.
You clearly haven't read what I've written, which is that the scandal is disgusting and I don't see how he gets out of it and in all honesty I think he should resign.
But you can't change facts. The email wasn't sent by him. But he attended and tried to deny it and he's in it up to his neck.
There is no problem with sticking to the facts though is there? I always find that quite a useful strategy to employ tbh
To be fair hes such a feckwit taking 25minutes to realise that this was a Tory tw@ts piss up gathering and not a work event is probably something you can expect from him.
Doesnt sound as though the p!ss up was risk assessed either.😂😂😂
Starmer couldn't ask that question as it's akin to accusing Johnson of lying which is not permissible in the House.
He correctly plays the long game, waiting until today to call on Johnson to resign. If he'd made frequent earlier calls, which would have fallen on deaf ears, the impact would have been negated.
Starmer has not been strong enough to hammer him in the past.
Today he nailed it. Johnson made himself a laughing stock. His attempted comebacks pathetic and made him look worse.
Called for him to resign and let himself hang himself even further.
If he wont go its up to the Tories to kick him out.
The Scottish Tory Leader at least showed some courage and has called for him to go.
Arty pathetic.
I could be totally wrong here but does asking him if he lied to The House constitute him calling him a liar (I'm aware that's not the done thing though I think it's one of those stupid rules)? He's not stating that Johnson lied, he's asking him 'if' he lied whereby Johnson implicates himself or makes things worse or both? Isn't this the Erskine May bible thing?
You maybe right although I suspect that Starmer and his team deemed it safer not to make this point and risk losing a question.
Lyndsey Hoyle is not the strongest speaker sadly - i guess Starmer may have made this correct point if Bercow was still in situ!!
There's a rumour that he shagged priti in the bogs and she's now carrying his love child.
far fetched?....this government...naaaahhh!!