-
A fiver's worth of food for £30.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
I really dont like using the word, but I absolutely 'hate' what the Tories are doing to our people.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
The company responsible for providing the catering in Concept House (BSO in Newport) when I worked there was called Compass who are part of the group of companies owned by the rip off merchants supplying those food parcels. Compass took over the contract at BSO after I’d been there a couple of years and used a lot of the staff who were there with the previous contractors- they all used to say that Compass was a much worse company to work for and no one I knew out of the office workers had a good word to say about them - prices went up within a month or so of them taking over.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
The company responsible for providing the catering in Concept House (BSO in Newport) when I worked there was called Compass who are part of the group of companies owned by the rip off merchants supplying those food parcels. Compass took over the contract at BSO after I’d been there a couple of years and used a lot of the staff who were there with the previous contractors- they all used to say that Compass was a much worse company to work for and no one I knew out of the office workers had a good word to say about them - prices went up within a month or so of them taking over.
Don't they also run the food stands at our stadium?
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Nice work if you can get it. No doubt Feedback will be on here to show how well the private sector is doing so well to provide that amount for the price.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
surge
Don't they also run the food stands at our stadium?
Yes, although I think their ten year contract has probably run out now - my previous experience of them was one of a few reasons why I decided I wouldn’t be using the bars or food stalls in the new ground.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
surge
Don't they also run the food stands at our stadium?
Certainly used to. I seem to recall Ridsdale arranged a contract with them. 🙄
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
The company responsible for providing the catering in Concept House (BSO in Newport) when I worked there was called Compass who are part of the group of companies owned by the rip off merchants supplying those food parcels. Compass took over the contract at BSO after I’d been there a couple of years and used a lot of the staff who were there with the previous contractors- they all used to say that Compass was a much worse company to work for and no one I knew out of the office workers had a good word to say about them - prices went up within a month or so of them taking over.
My daughter worked for them for a while years ago. Wages were minimum, food portion control fierce!
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
Not defending the company in the slightest, but one photograph of 1 in possibly 100,000's of deliveries. Would suggest some less over-reaction and perspective before the rants go over the Richter scale, but then again this is CCMB..
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Politicians, and Marcus Rashford, getting involved now;-
https://www.theguardian.com/educatio...-meal-packages
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
I think she wanted the £30 in vouchers so she could get some beer & fags!
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A Quiet Monkfish
Not defending the company in the slightest, but one photograph of 1 in possibly 100,000's of deliveries. Would suggest some less over-reaction and perspective before the rants go over the Richter scale, but then again this is CCMB..
Mods please delete what I'm about to post.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I’m getting individual permission from everyone sending me pics of their food boxes in my DMs to repost them here but without identifying information because I try to be responsible with this large platform and there are ~children~ involved here.<br><br>Disclaimer done, now get angry.</p>— Jack Monroe (@BootstrapCook) <a href="https://twitter.com/BootstrapCook/status/1348917929132367872?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 12, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
blueblade
I think she wanted the £30 in vouchers so she could get some beer & fags!
The twitter page Lardy has posted above includes this snippet:
"The vouchers were a good idea. They were BLOCKED from being spent on age restricted products, like alcohol, lottery tickets, cigarettes."
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A Quiet Monkfish
Not defending the company in the slightest, but one photograph of 1 in possibly 100,000's of deliveries. Would suggest some less over-reaction and perspective before the rants go over the Richter scale, but then again this is CCMB..
Of course, this isn't happening. Neither is the pandemic. Is it? :shrug:
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
surge
The twitter page Lardy has posted above includes this snippet:
"The vouchers were a good idea. They were BLOCKED from being spent on age restricted products, like alcohol, lottery tickets, cigarettes."
The Salvation Army did great work at Christmas giving out vouchers to needy families but they were restricted to certain shops and couldn't be used to buy tobacco or alcohol. Don't see anything wrong with that.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A Quiet Monkfish
Not defending the company in the slightest, but one photograph of 1 in possibly 100,000's of deliveries. Would suggest some less over-reaction and perspective before the rants go over the Richter scale, but then again this is CCMB..
looks like it is pretty widespread
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
Yes, well done to Wales Government for funding kids meals properly, and not waiting for Marcus Rashford to tell them to.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rjk
As FLL says, the Welsh gov are doing it through the public sector, England is it privatised, and surprise surprise, it has gone to a Tory donor who is trying to make a quick buck. They are absolute scum.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A Quiet Monkfish
Not defending the company in the slightest, but one photograph of 1 in possibly 100,000's of deliveries. Would suggest some less over-reaction and perspective before the rants go over the Richter scale, but then again this is CCMB..
:thumbup:
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Om PM on BBC they have clarified this, saying the box was not supposed to constitute 2 weeks food or £30. The company providing have isssued a staement that the value of the "Hamper" was £10 and have accepted that "in this instance" the quality and quantity were not up to standard and this will not be repeated So let's see if it is?
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
xsnaggle
Om PM on BBC they have clarified this, saying the box was not supposed to constitute 2 weeks food or £30. The company providing have isssued a staement that the value of the "Hamper" was £10 and have accepted that "in this instance" the quality and quantity were not up to standard and this will not be repeated So let's see if it is?
Jack Monroe has 600 examples from all over England. It is not an isolated instance, it is widespread. They are scum.
https://twitter.com/BootstrapCook/st...56034506158080
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Some shocking pics flying about but unless I’ve misunderstood there isn’t a national “FSM contract” for England that has been won through tender?
I was under the impression that individual schools administered FSM and ultimately have discretion around how it’s administered, either through a local voucher system or whatever they have in place through their canteen contract arrangements.
Doesn’t detract from how disdainful some of these parcels are but unless I’m mistaken they reflect individual school arrangements, which doesn’t reflect well on the companies that have been feeding our children in the school canteen before the pandemic...
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
I think it is sourced and arranged by local councils, who are responisble for the schools in their area. But the funding, or part of it, comes from central government
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Yet another scandal against the British people by the Tories.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
xsnaggle
Om PM on BBC they have clarified this, saying the box was not supposed to constitute 2 weeks food or £30. The company providing have isssued a staement that the value of the "Hamper" was £10 and have accepted that "in this instance" the quality and quantity were not up to standard and this will not be repeated So let's see if it is?
Their statement was more interesting actually. They said the total cost was £10.50 including 'distribution and packaging'. Since we know they likely bough the food for less than £5, that means they are attributing more than the cost of the food itself for distribution and packaging, which is clearly daylight robbery.
The point to take from this is that it is privatisation working as intended. The company gets their obscene profit margin and the government gets to act appalled and shocked when your taxes are spent badly, despite being the ones taking them out of your pockets.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
But but Jeremy Corbyn would have been worse.
Hope those all in the 'red wall' are happy with what they have voted for.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hilts
But but Jeremy Corbyn would have been worse.
Hope those all in the 'red wall' are happy with what they have voted for.
They are receiving their jabs first. North East and Yorkshire have raced ahead of other parts of England in distributing/administering the vaccine. From personal experience, the Midlands hasn't done too badly, either. Meanwhile, Wales is to England as Palestine is to Israel (almost) when it comes to receiving vaccines. The superhubs in England are to be prioritised for receiving vaccines. Easier to distribute to, politically it looks good, hides the shambles that were the Covid wards at Nightingale hospitals and takes pressure off GP surgeries to administer vaccines. Meanwhile, companies benefit from providing paltry food parcels. What happened to Healthy Eating initiatives?
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hilts
But but Jeremy Corbyn would have been worse.
Hope those all in the 'red wall' are happy with what they have voted for.
If they'd only listened to me.......
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Former Labour leader
If they'd only listened to me.......
To be fair 'you'were part of the problem but would have been better than these clowns.
The Labour issues started by electing the wrong Milliband brother then made possibly the worse mistake in its history by electing Corbyn.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
I can only listen to Morgan in small doses but fair do's Hancock is squirming on his seat here....
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“If you’re that glad why did you vote against it..you were shamed into it..do you regret voting against it now?”<br><br>The Health Secretary’s reply is shocking <br><br>Another masterclass from <a href="https://twitter.com/piersmorgan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@piersmorgan</a> in how to hold Gov’t to account <a href="https://t.co/ccTpeoDeCx">pic.twitter.com/ccTpeoDeCx</a></p>— Peter Stefanovic (@PeterStefanovi2) <a href="https://twitter.com/PeterStefanovi2/status/1349280495914393600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Baloo
I can only listen to Morgan in small doses but fair do's Hancock is squirming on his seat here....
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“If you’re that glad why did you vote against it..you were shamed into it..do you regret voting against it now?”<br><br>The Health Secretary’s reply is shocking <br><br>Another masterclass from <a href="https://twitter.com/piersmorgan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@piersmorgan</a> in how to hold Gov’t to account <a href="https://t.co/ccTpeoDeCx">pic.twitter.com/ccTpeoDeCx</a></p>— Peter Stefanovic (@PeterStefanovi2) <a href="https://twitter.com/PeterStefanovi2/status/1349280495914393600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Hancock the latest in a long line of Tories to fail upwards. How on earth he is still health sec is mind blowing.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
This country is full of stupid twats who have voted for this bunch of tossers and they are going to get it right up the arse
The rich will be fine and vote tory as they always have
Don't say you were not warned
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pedro de la Rosa
Hancock the latest in a long line of Tories to fail upwards. How on earth he is still health sec is mind blowing.
Gove, ****
Patel , ****
Hancock , ****
Boris ? Fecking hell he's off his head
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pedro de la Rosa
Hancock the latest in a long line of Tories to fail upwards. How on earth he is still health sec is mind blowing.
He's there because we have a media that predominantly attacks the poorest and most vulnerable, attacks social policy and anyone who promotes a caring attitude towards state run social provision. It simply isn't in the interests of the Tories (and now Labour) to throw public money at marginalised groups if they can't make a quick buck along the way. It seems to have transcended into the psyche of a large portion of the great british voting public, many of them can't seem to stomach the fact that getting people out of poverty is going to cost money, everyone's money, and that we have a moral duty to help those less fortunate.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Former Labour leader
I really dont like using the word, but I absolutely 'hate' what the Tories are doing to our people.
The fact that these food parcel contracts are organised by Local Education Authorities, quite a few of which are Labour controlled, has nothing to do with it I suppose, in your world.
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tuerto
He's there because we have a media that predominantly attacks the poorest and most vulnerable, attacks social policy and anyone who promotes a caring attitude towards state run social provision. It simply isn't in the interests of the Tories (and now Labour) to throw public money at marginalised groups if they can't make a quick buck along the way. It seems to have transcended into the psyche of a large portion of the great british voting public, many of them can't seem to stomach the fact that getting people out of poverty is going to cost money, everyone's money, and that we have a moral duty to help those less fortunate.
Top of the class
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dml1954
The fact that these food parcel contracts are organised by Local Education Authorities, quite a few of which are Labour controlled, has nothing to do with it I suppose, in your world.
what is your position on matt Hancock making an utter **** of himself and conservative government policy regarding food parcels in the clip above ?
Is this the sort of utter **** you are defending ?
Tell me you , in your world , are not serious ?
-
Re: A fiver's worth of food for £30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Tuerto
He's there because we have a media that predominantly attacks the poorest and most vulnerable, attacks social policy and anyone who promotes a caring attitude towards state run social provision. It simply isn't in the interests of the Tories (and now Labour) to throw public money at marginalised groups if they can't make a quick buck along the way. It seems to have transcended into the psyche of a large portion of the great british voting public, many of them can't seem to stomach the fact that getting people out of poverty is going to cost money, everyone's money, and that we have a moral duty to help those less fortunate.
He's also happy to sit there like a nodding dog and take criticism. Too many of our media are concerned about access rather than telling the truth. The government have got everyone blaming themselves over the covid deaths rather than their complete and utter inaction causing tens of thousands of deaths. In this instance however, I have no idea why people are happy to blame "scroungers" when this billion pound company is openly stealing from the tax payer in broad daylight. Whatever people's thoughts are on people on benefits, this company was given that money to do a job, and they've not come close to fulfilling it and they're just profiteering. It is a disgrace.
Still, the Tories have told us that Brexit will solve all our issues, so glad we've sorted that out and I'm sure after they've lead us into record levels of poverty that more austerity will fix all our problems.