-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
I think I can help clear up what's happened here.
He doesn't know what 'verified' means, and thinks it's similar to 'requested'.
A person's identity is verified when they request an absentee postal ballot. Best stick to your Russia collusion propaganda bollocks, it's more your thing!
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Today is gonna be the day that they're gonna throw it back to you :flare:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Is Trump's campaign running out of money?
https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...finance-2020-9
Indeed, on a daily basis, the press is reporting that the Trump campaign is pulling its media buys in target states like Arizona and Ohio. It can't afford them. And unlike most of the rest of the world, local television stations still require cash up front before running a campaign's ads; they know better. Cash-poor campaigns are happy to stiff vendors (sounds like Trump, by the way) to keep moving forward.
It is no accident that Trump is traveling and doing rallies like Bob Dole in the last 24 hours of 1996. Given his campaign's cash position, the only way for the president to drive attention is to be on the stump as often as he can be, saying things he knows will drive press coverage regardless of how insane they sound (and are).
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Is Trump's campaign running out of money?
Indeed, on a daily basis, the press is reporting that the Trump campaign is pulling its media buys in target states like Arizona and Ohio. It can't afford them. And unlike most of the rest of the world, local television stations still require cash up front before running a campaign's ads; they know better. Cash-poor campaigns are happy to stiff vendors (sounds like Trump, by the way) to keep moving forward.
It is no accident that Trump is traveling and doing rallies like Bob Dole in the last 24 hours of 1996. Given his campaign's cash position, the only way for the president to drive attention is to be on the stump as often as he can be, saying things he knows will drive press coverage regardless of how insane they sound (and are).
Chop-chop lardy, it's time to kick-start your propaganda machine! ... Russia! Russia!! Rusia!!!
<iframe id="twitter-widget-0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" class="" style="position: static; visibility: visible; width: 379px; height: 596px; display: block; flex-grow: 1;" title="Twitter Tweet" src="https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1 308370443909431298&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fww w.ccmb.co.uk%2Fshowthread.php%3F423759-The-Donald-Trump-thread%2Fpage242&theme=light&widgetsVersion=219d02 1%3A1598982042171&width=550px" data-tweet-id="1308370443909431298"></iframe>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe>
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Same old Dems, always cheating :biggrin:
Dem cheating bastards I can hear the City lads sing
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Chop-chop lardy, it's time to kick-start your propaganda machine! ... Russia! Russia!! Rusia!!!
<iframe id="twitter-widget-0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" class="" style="position: static; visibility: visible; width: 379px; height: 596px; display: block; flex-grow: 1;" title="Twitter Tweet" src="https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1 308370443909431298&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fww w.ccmb.co.uk%2Fshowthread.php%3F423759-The-Donald-Trump-thread%2Fpage242&theme=light&widgetsVersion=219d02 1%3A1598982042171&width=550px" data-tweet-id="1308370443909431298"></iframe>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe>
Jeeper's they have all seen Putin's briefs, my god what next that it I'm voting for Sara Palin , If she stands in Wales
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
A person's identity is verified when they request an absentee postal ballot. Best stick to your Russia collusion propaganda bollocks, it's more your thing!
Sorry to labour the point but those ballots sent to all Registered voters rather than a requested absentee ballot (what you call a registered ballot) is that what you are calling an unregistered ballot?
If so what does the recipient of such a ballot (whether they got it because they were registered of just plucked one of the trillions floating around in pubs beforehand) have to do to cast a vote?
Then what do the authorities do when they recieve it (key point of clarification is it different to what they do when they receive an absentee (registered) ballot?
Clear answers and no-one will think that you are just a cut and paste bollocks merchant!
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Sorry to labour the point but those ballots sent to all Registered voters rather than a requested absentee ballot (what you call a registered ballot) is that what you are calling an unregistered ballot?
If so what does the recipient of such a ballot (whether they got it because they were registered of just plucked one of the trillions floating around in pubs beforehand) have to do to cast a vote?
Then what do the authorities do when they recieve it (key point of clarification is it different to what they do when they receive an absentee (registered) ballot?
Clear answers and no-one will think that you are just a cut and paste bollocks merchant!
Yes, the boxes of ballots found in bushes and abandoned buildings can all be filled in by a single person, who pretends to be the person named on the ballot.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Yes, the boxes of ballots found in bushes and abandoned buildings can all be filled in by a single person, who pretends to be the person named on the ballot.
How do they do that...by incredibly being able to forge the signature of the individual who has to provide a signature as an obligation of becoming a registered voter (there's that phrase again) to get on the electoral roll of voters to receive a ballot in the first place?
Just talk us through the fraud. I will start:
1) Dodgy Dem/Antifa/Progressive finds 500 ballots washing around in the pubs beforehand
What are the next steps they take to be able to cast a vote for Joe Biden?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
How do they do that...by incredibly being able to forge the signature of the individual who has to provide a signature as an obligation of becoming a registered voter (there's that phrase again) to get on the electoral roll of voters to receive a ballot in the first place?
Just talk us through the fraud. I will start:
1) Dodgy Dem/Antifa/Progressive finds 500 ballots washing around in the pubs beforehand
What are the next steps they take to be able to cast a vote for Joe Biden?
Nobody will be checking dude, there will be tens of millions of them to count. You thought Mueller's investigation was legit, so maybe you're not the best equipped person to be commenting on cases of fraudulent activity :biggrin:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
No one will be checking dude, there will be tens of millions of them to count. You thought Mueller's investigation was legit, so maybe your not best equipped person to comment on fraud :biggrin:
Forget the deflection. When you say no-one will be checking what do you mean? That the signature on the outside of the ballot will not be checked by election officials?
Now as others have pointed out this process could take a while and might give people not absolutely wedded to the democratic process all opportunities to play games.
If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.
You don't have to look this stupid every time you are completely wrong you know!
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Forget the deflection. When you say no-one will be checking what do you mean? That the signature on the outside of the ballot will not be checked by election officials?
Now as others have pointed out this process could take a while and might give people not absolutely wedded to the democratic process all opportunities to play games.
If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.
You don't have to look this stupid every time you are completely wrong you know!
Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!
Q If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.
A. Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!
Four years of the Politics Board Redux!
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!
Have you ever answered a straight question in your life?
I understand that you have PhD standards when it comes to deflection, hypocrisy, avoidance, plain BS, alt-right bubble abuse and lame ITK fog based on dumb and slavish adherence to neo Nazi conspiracy sites. But surely somewhere in there is the scope to answer a simple question with a straight answer? Are you always running away? Sad!
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Q If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.
A. Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!
Four years of the Politics Board Redux!
Forget about the mechanics of it all, as it's a bit above your pay grade, but just like Russia collusion and the Muellerr investigation, I will be proved right yet again. I always win the long game, and I know it drives you nuts :biggrin:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Forget about the mechanics of it all, as it's a bit above your pay grade, but just like Russia collusion and the Muellerr investigation, I will be proved right yet again. I always win the long games, and I know it drives you nuts :biggrin:
The thing about voting is that it is all about mechanics or procedures, not political views. You just have to point out why the current US system of validating postal votes by checking the person against the electoral roll of registered voters and their previously supplied signature is wide open to fraud because " boxes of ballots found in bushes and abandoned buildings can all be filled in by a single person, who pretends to be the person named on the ballot."
It's got shit all to do with long games just you being unable to substantiate a statement that the US election is fatally flawed because of registered and unregistered votes.
Clue...the answer has nothing to do with Mueller, Russia, Steele, Antifa et al. Just you talking bollocks and being unable to justify a scintilla of it to anyone, (except LoM and RogersBlue of course). Sometimes it's just as well that you are "blessed" with your level of self-awareness.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
The thing about voting is that it is all about mechanics or procedures, not political views. You just have to point out why the current US system of validating postal votes by checking the person against the electoral roll of registered voters and their previously supplied signature is wide open to fraud because " boxes of ballots found in bushes and abandoned buildings can all be filled in by a single person, who pretends to be the person named on the ballot."
It's got shit all to do with long games just you being unable to substantiate a statement that the US election is fatally flawed because of registered and unregistered votes.
Clue...the answer has nothing to do with Mueller, Russia, Steele, Antifa et al. Just you talking bollocks and being unable to justify a scintilla of it to anyone, (except LoM and RogersBlue of course). Sometimes it's just as well that you are "blessed" with your level of self-awareness.
They will use the huge numbers of uncounted postal ballots as a reason to delay the announcement of the winner, and then it will end up in the courts. Surely you have worked all this out already?
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Ooh nice, I hope it will have been worth the wait, whatever it is! :flare:
<iframe id="twitter-widget-0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" class="" style="position: static; visibility: visible; width: 550px; height: 174px; display: block; flex-grow: 1;" title="Twitter Tweet" src="https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1 308530757313400832&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fww w.ccmb.co.uk%2Feditpost.php%3Fp%3D5119676%26do%3De ditpost&theme=light&widgetsVersion=219d021%3A15989 82042171&width=550px" data-tweet-id="1308530757313400832"></iframe>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2d7d9a6d04538bf11c7b23641e75738c.htm l?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ccmb.co.uk" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe>
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Forget the deflection. When you say no-one will be checking what do you mean? That the signature on the outside of the ballot will not be checked by election officials?
Now as others have pointed out this process could take a while and might give people not absolutely wedded to the democratic process all opportunities to play games.
If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.
You don't have to look this stupid every time you are completely wrong you know!
"No one will be checking"
Our resident US expert doesn't know that the two parties are entitled to have people watching each postal vote being opened and challenging it. A successful challenge means the vote is binned.
The republicans are advertising frantically for watchers, knowing that each postal vote that is excluded is more likely to be a vote for the opposition than them.
It'll come as a huge surprise to us all, but gluey is talking total rubbish. "No one will be checking" - they will be checked and challenged more closely than ever.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Forget about the mechanics of it all, as it's a bit above your pay grade, but just like Russia collusion and the Muellerr investigation, I will be proved right yet again. I always win the long game, and I know it drives you nuts :biggrin:
I've got to confess that I just can't get this "independent thinker" vocabulary - my definition of the term "proved right yet again" is clearly completely different from yours.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
I've got to confess that I just can't get this "independent thinker" vocabulary - my definition of the term "proved right yet again" is clearly completely different from yours.
It's quite simple - it means that one day you can say the Mueller investigation was a sham and another day you can say it completely exonerated Trump. Being an independent thinker means you can do both.
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
It's quite simple - it means that one day you can say the Mueller investigation was a sham and another day you can say it completely exonerated Trump. Being an independent thinker means you can do both.
In the same way that when I pointed out that his favourite Treehouse was calling the "Durham" Investigation a sham he said he knew that weeks ago yet here he is wetting his pants waiting for what Barr's poodle will say!
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
"No one will be checking"
Our resident US expert doesn't know that the two parties are entitled to have people watching each postal vote being opened and challenging it. A successful challenge means the vote is binned.
The republicans are advertising frantically for watchers, knowing that each postal vote that is excluded is more likely to be a vote for the opposition than them.
It'll come as a huge surprise to us all, but gluey is talking total rubbish. "No one will be checking" - they will be checked and challenged more closely than ever.
It will take them months to count the millions of postal ballots, so no winner will be declared on the night of the election, or during the legally specified timeframe following the election. Are you thick or something? (no need to answer!)
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
In the same way that when I pointed out that his favourite Treehouse was calling the "Durham" Investigation a sham he said he knew that weeks ago yet here he is wetting his pants waiting for what Barr's poodle will say!
You lose every way, so there is that to look forward to. Smug Cyril failing to see the truth, even after having it pointed out to him on a daily basis! :biggrin:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
It's quite simple - it means that one day you can say the Mueller investigation was a sham and another day you can say it completely exonerated Trump. Being an independent thinker means you can do both.
Likewise you can say Russia collusion happened, and three years later in 2020 you can say Russia collusion happened!
PS proof of the scam only emerged after the report was released, so it is factually correct that he was exonerated, even though the investigation was a scam :wink:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
I've got to confess that I just can't get this "independent thinker" vocabulary - my definition of the term "proved right yet again" is clearly completely different from yours.
Says the bloke who thinks the previous president ran the most honest administration in history! :hehe: :biggrin: :hehe:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
You lose every way, so there is that to look forward to. Smug Cyril failing to see the truth, even after having it pointed out to him on a daily basis! :biggrin:
Ok I'll start the game you seemed reluctant to play.
Quote:
You seem to be caught in two minds Bob, so maybe this will convince you that what you are thinking is correct? -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Seth_Rich
Just remember who was on which side when this event comes to it's logical conclusion, as the losers will crash pretty hard.
Now your turn
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Ok I'll start the game you seemed reluctant to play.
Now your turn
Who gives a feck what you think! You are a cheap (and bad) propagandist :hehe:
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
-
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wales-Bales
Who gives a feck what you think! You are a cheap (and bad) propagandist :hehe:
No 2
Quote:
Trump is a genius!
No 3
Quote:
I don't know what Trump is up to, but he seems to have got those multiple shooting events under contol that were happening on a regular basis in the run up to the last election.