Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
I saw a number of exchanges between you and Heisenburg were removed for some reason, including several where he called you a c~nt.
Can't remember you sticking up for his democratic right to free speech. Obviously if you complained to the mods about it that would make you a hypocrite and that couldn't possibly be the case given the consistency of your posting history now could it Herbie.
Think your confusing rudeness with debate , free speech is fine , however controversial, intelligent debate is fine you don't need to degrade the conversation with nasty outbursts and name calling , using an insulting word such as c!!t is both rude and poor and certainly doesn't fit into free speech , it falls into another category called insult and hatred ( and delivered in a very cowardly way as well ) .
Surprised you think differently unless he's a mate ??
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Think your confusing rudeness with debate , free speech is fine , however controversial, intelligent debate is fine you don't need to degrade the conversation with nasty outbursts and name calling , using an insulting word such as c!!t is both rude and poor and certainly doesn't fit into free speech , it falls into another category called insult and hatred ( and delivered in a very cowardly way as well ) .
Surprised you think differently unless he's a mate ??
Ah, see where you are coming from.
We need to defend the right of Donald Trump to make mocking gestures about people with disabilities, praise openly racists and fascists as fine people, claim a female interviewer was only unfair to him because she was menstruating and encourage and defend the "patriots" who marched on a democratic parliament in an attempted coup. All in the name of free speech.
But should someone use a crude noun to describe you this can't be tolerated and needed to be reported to the mods so the "cancel culture/moderation rules of the social media group (delete as appropriate)" could kick in.
Personally I thought it a little over the top and Racist Mysoginistic Hypocrite was perfectly adequate.
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Ah, see where you are coming from.
We need to defend the right of Donald Trump to make mocking gestures about people with disabilities, praise openly racists and fascists as fine people, claim a female interviewer was only unfair to him because she was menstruating and encourage and defend the "patriots" who marched on a democratic parliament in an attempted coup. All in the name of free speech.
But should someone use a crude noun to describe you this can't be tolerated and needed to be reported to the mods so the "cancel culture/moderation rules of the social media group (delete as appropriate)" could kick in.
Personally I thought it a little over the top and Racist Mysoginistic Hypocrite was perfectly adequate.
Using crude nouns as you call them holds no respect for decent people, sadly they are only fired from keyboards .
Don't worry yer mate will be back to his crude best soon if he's not back already in his non political identity 😉
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Using crude nouns as you call them holds no respect for decent people, sadly they are only fired from keyboards .
Don't worry yer mate will be back to his crude best soon if he's not back already in his non political identity 😉
My ban from the mods ran out yesterday at 10pm.
I'm going to delete my account as I've had enough of this board tbh. The mods failed to pick up on a picture that I posted months ago to prove that they have given up moderating.
Calling you a c**t is nowhere near as bad as the repeated bigotry you spout on here on a weekly basis.
LOM, you like using the term keyboard warrior to describe me but I can absolutely promise you that I'd say worse things to your face if I ever met you. I think you're scum.
For the record, I've been posting over on a different messageboard and have no interest in an alternative account to post on here. Lardy can vouch for me on that one.
So, my parting words to you are... You're still a bigoted, hypocritical c**t and your denial of this will never change that fact.
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Using crude nouns as you call them holds no respect for decent people, sadly they are only fired from keyboards .
Don't worry yer mate will be back to his crude best soon if he's not back already in his non political identity 😉
https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.ph...=1#post5164265
You really need to work out in that befuddled mind of yours whether you see being called that kind of name deeply offensive or some kind of warped badge of honour.
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Trump found a new way to rip off his loyal supporters and squeeze every dollar he could from them.
This time, his website automatically checked the recurring donation checkbox, and hid its purpose in small print.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">What exactly did those prechecked boxes look like? <br><br>Well, as the campaign’s finances worsened they became dizzyingly complex. Here is an example from October of the text a Trump donor would have to wade through — and uncheck — to not give multiple times.<a href="https://t.co/vu10yWJaEs">https://t.co/vu10yWJaEs</a> <a href="https://t.co/N3NdYSMYPH">pic.twitter.com/N3NdYSMYPH</a></p>— Shane Goldmacher (@ShaneGoldmacher) <a href="https://twitter.com/ShaneGoldmacher/status/1378399587426254850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 3, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Not only did this put people in financial peril, as they had no idea it was happening until they found their bank accounts emptying fast, but it was illegal to take this much from individuals. Money was later refunded, but after Election Day. In other words, the money was in Trump's account when he needed it the most, and would have been a major factor had he won the election.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump campaign accepted millions of dollars above the legal cap. A NYC pianist contributed more than 100 times in the months leading up to Election Day, going far past the legal limit of $2,800. She was refunded $87,716.50—three weeks after Election Day.<a href="https://t.co/ge0iWek8qN">https://t.co/ge0iWek8qN</a></p>— Julia Davis (@JuliaDavisNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1378583417030328320?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 4, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Heisenberg
My ban from the mods ran out yesterday at 10pm.
I'm going to delete my account as I've had enough of this board tbh. The mods failed to pick up on a picture that I posted months ago to prove that they have given up moderating.
Calling you a c**t is nowhere near as bad as the repeated bigotry you spout on here on a weekly basis.
LOM, you like using the term keyboard warrior to describe me but I can absolutely promise you that I'd say worse things to your face if I ever met you. I think you're scum.
For the record, I've been posting over on a different messageboard and have no interest in an alternative account to post on here. Lardy can vouch for me on that one.
So, my parting words to you are... You're still a bigoted, hypocritical c**t and your denial of this will never change that fact.
You just can't help yourself once again , you've just let yourself down, I can only hope you reflecton your poor use of language, I'd hate to see it used in front of family and friends ,its sad you can't just debate views without resorting to such low levels.
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
Its about decency.
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Its about decency.
The thing about decency is that it means different things to different people.
Some people think that someone who equates being a naturally born UK citizen with being white lacks decency.
Others think refusing to buy a Chinese takeaway in Cardiff because of what they did at the start of Covid lacks decency.
And some will think that blaming underage girls for being complicit in their exploitation by rich, powerful men shows a complete lack of a moral compass.
But let's not swear on a football message board eh!
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cyril evans awaydays
The thing about decency is that it means different things to different people.
Some people think that someone who equates being a naturally born UK citizen with being white lacks decency.
Others think refusing to buy a Chinese takeaway in Cardiff because of what they did at the start of Covid lacks decency.
And some will think that blaming underage girls for being complicit in their exploitation by rich, powerful men shows a complete lack of a moral compass.
But let's not swear on a football message board eh!
Both the comments were off the cuff with no real intent and the Chinese one was banter , sadly in this world some girls don't have a moral compass and some are victims I certainty don't thing I deserved all this personal nastiness , I get why, its down to chasing of people with differing views or challenges form the politics board , the nastiness doesn't always materialise in the other sections of CCMB .
Sad it came to this I can promise I wouldn't use that language in any reply , strangely you mention woman and moral compass mothers /.daughters actually find the words C!!!t and T!!at repulsive , awful words in my book ,very personal .
I didn't want to fall out over it just wanted debate ?
Up the City
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
life on mars
Both the comments were off the cuff with no real intent and the Chinese one was banter , sadly in this world some girls don't have a moral compass and some are victims I certainty don't thing I deserved all this personal nastiness , I get why, its down to chasing of people with differing views or challenges form the politics board , the nastiness doesn't always materialise in the other sections of CCMB .
Sad it came to this I can promise I wouldn't use that language in any reply , strangely you mention woman and moral compass mothers /.daughters actually find the words C!!!t and T!!at repulsive , awful words in my book ,very personal .
I didn't want to fall out over it just wanted debate ?
Up the City
Would a mother prefer to hear the word Twat or get told that her groomed underage daughter was asking for it?
Ooh not sure! About the same really, aren't they?
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lardy
Would a mother prefer to hear the word Twat or get told that her groomed underage daughter was asking for it?
Ooh not sure! About the same really, aren't they?
I didn't target the girl specifically I simply said sadly some teenagers and parents are aware of the paths and environments they take up and enter , if you think that world doesn't exist thats fine its a point of view .
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
:hehe: 'Trump’s $27m-a-mile border wall being scaled with $5 ladders'. :hehe:
Mexicans may not have paid for Trump's xenophobic (often illusionary) barrier, but a maybe few of them have paid for the ladders. And best of all, the ladders are real!
Re: The Donald Trump thread
this will be interesting an audit of the Arizona US election ballots resuming after the democrats tryed to stop . i wonder why :hehe:
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/23/p...dit/index.html
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MOZZER2
You wonder why?
You could just read the article you linked to answer your own question! :hehe: :hehe:
This covers it:
An election audit of the 2020 ballots from Arizona's largest county -- one demanded by Republican state senators, overseen by a purveyor of election conspiracies and live streamed by a pro-Trump television network -- kicked off on Friday.
The partisan audit, which could stretch for roughly two months, comes after county election officials conducted two audits and found no evidence of widespread voter fraud and other issues. The Arizona Secretary of State has already certified the election results, showing President Joe Biden narrowly won the state. But the latest review highlights how many Republicans continue to cling to former President Donald Trump's unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud in 2020 -- falsehoods that continue to roil the GOP.
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann, a Republican who has led the charge for the audit, has insisted she's running a fair process to ensure election integrity. But the overtly partisan review has already sparked an outcry from nonpartisan election security experts, GOP officials in Maricopa County and Arizona's secretary of state, among others.
"I have been avoiding calling it an audit to be quite honest with you, because that's not what it is. They have been making this up as they go along," Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, said in an interview with CNN. "This is just a fishing expedition by people who are determined to find something wrong.
The review is being overseen by a company whose chief executive supported Trump and shared election conspiracies in since deleted tweets, and it will be live broadcast by the right-wing One American News Network. The audit's GOP organizers have been cagey about who will be doing the ballot counting and whether the teams will be bipartisan. They also have ignored requests from election integrity groups to allow nonpartisan election administration experts to observe the process. And journalists who want to report on the endeavor are only allowed to do so if they agree to participate in the process as election observers and will be barred from taking notes or video.
"This is not like any audit I've ever seen," said Mark Lindeman, the acting co-director of Verified Voting, a nonpartisan organization focused on technology and election administration. "If it intends to be perceived as fair-minded and credible, they've made some bad mistakes."
Re: The Donald Trump thread
oh jon1959 it was done on purpose linking to what you would describe as a left wing news outlet . it was easy for me to post about this article from what you would describe as a right wing news outlet where the wording is alot different
what is not mentioned on this article is the audit is being done with ultra violet scanning on the ballots . This will really test the water with fake ballots not just hand counting not like the other audits which were just hand counted again
i will report back when all is done and dusted
Re: The Donald Trump thread
I would not describe CNN as a left wing news outlet.
But I look forward to your report back when all is done and dusted (fingerprints?), and ultravioleted.
Getting exciting now! :thumbup:
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jon1959
I would not describe CNN as a left wing news outlet.
But I look forward to your report back when all is done and dusted (fingerprints?), and ultravioleted.
Getting exciting now! :thumbup:
Perhaps it's time for this thread to make a reappearance getting on for three and a half years after it first appeared?
https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.ph...=Storm+brewing
When's Trump's re-inauguration?
Re: The Donald Trump thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
where's that nice Q-Anon poster from Mountain Ash who's name I forget these days? The one who kept saying stuff like a storm is coming? He's gone very quiet since Biden got in :sherlock: