It means read the quotes by the WHO ,which I notice you haven't quoted on .
Nice goal post move
Printable View
When it came to swine flu the WHO was criticised in some quarters for what some said was exaggerating the danger at a certain time during that crisis so perhaps they were extra cautious of that this time round.
Do you ever bother to read back to yourself what you've just written before hitting the reply button? The truth is that a significant percentage of your posts are little more than random and often unintelligible collections of words, but maybe that's because you're rushing your replies? If that's not the reason and these contributions actually make sense to you, then perhaps internet message boards aren't the right platform for you.
No goal posts moved. I've commented on your post and it's relevance to the thread. You wanting me to focus on another of your posts is moving "goal posts".
Keeping on topic of the post that I commented on and your response to it - Is every organisation that has a scandal "dodgy" in your opinion? If not, why are the WHO dodgy and not the others?
"try looking at the overall picture"...
Do you mean this one?
https://mondrian.mashable.com/upload....amazonaws.com
Yes it does have it critics even pre Trump ,
I listened to a debate on the radio on Sunday , they had all political divides on there , they concluded that the organization does need a shake up and the stupid Trump funding decision has simply thrusted that into the debate , you would think as an organisation with a previous history in these problems , they would be better prepared and more precise , apologies for this I copying the quotes form below its from a Liberal magazine called this week :
On 14 January, WHO said: “Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in Wuhan, China.”
It wasn’t until a week later, on 22 January, that the organisation released a public statement saying that human-to-human transmission did appear to be taking place in Wuhan.
At the end of January, however, WHO said that travel restrictions were not needed to stop the spread of Covid-19, reports the BBC. The US was one of the countries that ignored that advice and introduced a travel ban the next day.
WHO’s director-general Tedros praised China for its heavy lockdown restrictions, despite WHO experts being allowed into the country to investigate the outbreak only as late as 10 February, when the country already had more than 40,000 cases, says the BBC.
And WHO drew criticism in March for being evasive over Taiwan, which considers itself an independent nation but is ruled by China. Bruce Aylward, WHO assistant director-general, appeared to dodge questions on Taiwan, hanging up the video call.
WHO’s apparent pandering to China has not done the organisation any favours in dispelling ideas that it is constrained by politics and bureaucracy.
By the way I'm not a Trump fan ,just feel these large organisations are open to error , corruption, political point scoring to fit their narrative .
Hope this makes sense I do struggle at times :thumbup:
No.... you've lost me again.
I think you mean that all peace loving liberals and socialists should warmly welcome not only garbled posts from others, but also the garbled thinking behind those posts - all in the cause of 'inclusiveness'. But I'm probably wrong.... and not very nice!
What banner?
You seemed to have responded to every post (each one you have identified as being personally insulting) yet gloss over the one where I asked you this question:
Is every organisation that has a scandal "dodgy" in your opinion? If not, why are the WHO dodgy and not the others?
Surely you're not just looking for drama and are actually interested in the debate, right? I mean, you posted the article about a scandal within WHO in January 2019 for us to comment on and now... nothing back from you.
I was forced into using Fox News links because the other sources were unreliable!
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“The whole thing turned out to be a scam. It was a takedown of a duly elected president. The top of the FBI was scum, human scum. What am I going to do? You'll find out what I'm going to do.”<br><br>President Trump isn't speaking empty words. Buckle up.<a href="https://t.co/SIr9Kug7H5">pic.twitter.com/SIr9Kug7H5</a></p>— Mike Coudrey (@MichaelCoudrey) <a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1252054007096307712?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 20, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMCuB6mUVmQ
How the 'Plandemic' conspiracy theory took hold:
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...eory-took-hold
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ring-covid-19/
Wow.....just wow!
Your heroes regurgitating something from someone who has just has their twitter account suspended and Carlson's posting of the interview on Facebook has been labelled false by Facebook. Still plenty of time to add to your score.
17) I know what a Plandemic is and the current US investigation into the WHO is already examining the possibility that the virus was leaked from the Wuhan biolab, and that it may have been present in Wuhan earlier than thought;
18) I am sitting on some information that if true will shock a lot of people much worse than anything mentioned on here so far, but I'm not posting it until I can verify it with other sources.
25) I dunno, but the goings on in Wuhan seem a bit fishy to me, and the way things are heading I wouldn't be surprised to see China being asked to foot the bill, which would run into many trillions of dollars.
28) China were so successful in controlling the Coronavirus narrative via the WHO and world media, that there were people on here repeating the Chinese Communist Party line.
You were called out because you said you would never have a Chinese takeaway again (from the people of Cardiff that are mostly from Hong Kong) because of what they did on Coronavirus. If you can't take responsibility for your words try not to bleat about the badges that inevitably follow!