| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Originally Posted by Elwood Blues wrote on Tue, 15 September 2015 07:51
Elwood has had a right mare on this.I do notice the righties seem a little preoccupied with Corbyn. Thought they were celebrating or are they a tad worried ?
I wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.
It's everyone's favourite get-out clause: I was only winding you up.
Spot on feedy. Everyone knows that ignoring one berk on the street whose intention is to get a quote from you that he can use to attack you in an article is a slippery slope.He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway
What does this even mean?!He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway
you may not agree with a free press, but it is one of the cornerstones of our democracy. The free press exists to ask questions of our politicians and it appears that Corbyn has shown he does not agree with a free press and does not beleive he should be accountable to those who read the press. his actions speak louder than words.He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anywayThis.
why is Corbyn afraid to answer questions posed to him?Elwood has had a right mare on this.
you are not allowed to apply logic and reasoning to our JC, the man of the people and the saviour of the world.
That's some world-class conclusion jumping there feedy.He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anywayThis.I'm all for a free press, but this kind of badgering people on the street is completely unecessary. It's like a particularly crap episode of Rogue Traders.
Don't know, but then I don't know for sure that he is afraid of answering them - I don't see how anyone but him can say he is afraid either.Elwood has had a right mare on this.I do notice the righties seem a little preoccupied with Corbyn. Thought they were celebrating or are they a tad worried ?
I don't understand the right is worried comment or the assertion that Corbyn is ignoring Sky. The evidence suggests he is ignoring the media per se. So far Corbyn's has withdrawn at the last minute from 2 BBC TV interviews and one Radio 4 interview. He's also ducking out of Prime Minister's questions resolving to spread the task around with him doing only one appearance in 4 or 5. I wish Corbyn all the best as we need a decent opposition but the start has hardly been auspicious.
Throughout history, every socialist and hard left government has created an internal security agency above the law to suppress the people. The most well known were the stasi and securitate.He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anyway
I don't understand the right is worried comment or the assertion that Corbyn is ignoring Sky. The evidence suggests he is ignoring the media per se. So far Corbyn's has withdrawn at the last minute from 2 BBC TV interviews and one Radio 4 interview. He's also ducking out of Prime Minister's questions resolving to spread the task around with him doing only one appearance in 4 or 5. I wish Corbyn all the best as we need a decent opposition but the start has hardly been auspicious.you are not allowed to apply logic and reasoning to our JC, the man of the people and the saviour of the world.
You're on fine form today feedy.I don't understand the right is worried comment or the assertion that Corbyn is ignoring Sky. The evidence suggests he is ignoring the media per se. So far Corbyn's has withdrawn at the last minute from 2 BBC TV interviews and one Radio 4 interview. He's also ducking out of Prime Minister's questions resolving to spread the task around with him doing only one appearance in 4 or 5. I wish Corbyn all the best as we need a decent opposition but the start has hardly been auspicious.you are not allowed to apply logic and reasoning to our JC, the man of the people and the saviour of the world.
I'm trying to imagine a scenario in which Corbyn has become prime minister, introduced the secret police and then advised all citizens not to answer any of their questions.He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anywayI wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.
we can only form an opinion based on the evidence available to us. When asked a question did Corbyn (i) stop and respond, engaging in a constructive manner or (ii) avoid the question preferring to be elusive and aloofElwood has had a right mare on this.I do notice the righties seem a little preoccupied with Corbyn. Thought they were celebrating or are they a tad worried ?Aren't they just - I thought this new Labour leader was supposed to be a laughing stock?
The street urchin badgering him with the same question about women in the shadow cabinet didn't get his answer due, in part, to Corbyn's actions speaking louder than words:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/14/labour-mps-q uestion-jeremy-corbyn-eu-nato-shadow-cabinet-reshuffle
New Labour leader counters critics by naming 16 women in cabinet
Realised at the last minute how daft you soundedElwood has had a right mare on this.I do notice the righties seem a little preoccupied with Corbyn. Thought they were celebrating or are they a tad worried ?Aren't they just - I thought this new Labour leader was supposed to be a laughing stock?If Jeremy Corbyn has decided to have nothing to do with a news channel which barely bothers to hide it's political bias (and I mean proper bias, not the sort the BBC is always accused of by both right and left wingers), then he goes up in my estimation.
theI don't understand the right is worried comment or the assertion that Corbyn is ignoring Sky. The evidence suggests he is ignoring the media per se. So far Corbyn's has withdrawn at the last minute from 2 BBC TV interviews and one Radio 4 interview. He's also ducking out of Prime Minister's questions resolving to spread the task around with him doing only one appearance in 4 or 5. I wish Corbyn all the best as we need a decent opposition but the start has hardly been auspicious.you are not allowed to apply logic and reasoning to our JC, the man of the people and the saviour of the world.don't take everything written in these threads seriously
that is the point, Corbyn would want his questions answered but doesn't think he has to answer everyone else's questions. the man has shown his true colours - if he is elected as PM we will be a socialist pariah state in no time at all and we won't be able to walk the streets freely.He's under no obligation to talk to people following him on the street, they continued to follow him and ask the same questions long after it had become clear he had no intention of talking to them.I wouldn't mind betting he didn't want to give a Rupert Murdoch media outlet a story, although that didn't stop them uploading it anywayI wonder when the left get their way and was have the stasi or securitate on the streets following us whether the mantra from Corbyn will be that we can just 'avoid' their questions.
Elwood has had a right mare on this.I do notice the righties seem a little preoccupied with Corbyn. Thought they were celebrating or are they a tad worried ?Aren't they just - I thought this new Labour leader was supposed to be a laughing stock?If Jeremy Corbyn has decided to have nothing to do with a news channel which barely bothers to hide it's political bias (and I mean proper bias, not the sort the BBC is always accused of by both right and left wingers), then he goes up in my estimation.Elwood, you claim to know the difference between voluntarily turning up in a studio to be asked questions by a journalist and being pursued by one who I presume had been given no permission to do so (I see the words "stalking" and "harassment" being used in the comments section of that video) and yet you still choose to make a comparison between the two - why?
As for PMQs, one person's "ducking out" is another person's attempt to bring some credibility to a practice which has long since lost that quality in my opinion. Speaking as someone who is sick and tired of the yah, boo, sucks stuff we get every Wednesday lunchtime, I've no problem with something different being tried - it may not work, but, hopefully, we are now into an era where trying something different becomes more commonplace, because what we've had since the mid 90s has resulted in a populace that has had more than enough of the rush to the centre ground.
Corbyn knows this as well as anyone and yet here's feedy today, accusing Corbyn of "disagreeing with a free press" for ignoring one idiotic Murdoch street presser.
Saying that I can't see how a career politician can be seen to be a breathe of fresh air. He is a politician so should be instantly mistrusted.I don't understand the right is worried comment or the assertion that Corbyn is ignoring Sky. The evidence suggests he is ignoring the media per se. So far Corbyn's has withdrawn at the last minute from 2 BBC TV interviews and one Radio 4 interview. He's also ducking out of Prime Minister's questions resolving to spread the task around with him doing only one appearance in 4 or 5. I wish Corbyn all the best as we need a decent opposition but the start has hardly been auspicious.
Corbyn is a socialist. pretty much all socialists disagree with freedom of the press, freedom of thought and freedom of expression.Only yesterday feedy was saying:
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote