+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results

Thread: GLAMMY

  1. #3126

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Corleone View Post
    Any idea if he is any good? An average of 27 isn’t great
    I’d say it’s an avarage average (sorry) in the modern game - opening’s been a bit of a thankless task in the last five to ten years.

  2. #3127

    Re: GLAMMY

    I wonder if Selman is going back to Australia and not getting a new contract. Overall he has done enough to get another couple of years.

  3. #3128

    Re: GLAMMY

    Selman included in Glamorgan's team at Durham today as well as new boy Byrom, but no improvement in their fortunes - 85-6 after being put in with Rutherford getting more than half of the runs, but looking at these lunchtime scores, apart from a couple of exceptions, Glamorgan's score looks about par for the course;-

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scores-fixtures

  4. #3129

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glad they did better against Durham and Essex in the One Day Cup semi final and final.

  5. #3130

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    I wonder if Selman is going back to Australia and not getting a new contract. Overall he has done enough to get another couple of years.
    The fact that he didn't open today suggests he won't be with Glamorgan next year, I think.

  6. #3131

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glamorgan really have some pretty poor players in the red ball game and Lloyd is on that list right now. Getting a thorough pasting at Durham.

  7. #3132

    Re: GLAMMY

    Maynard gave them a free pass after the Essex hammering. Not this time please. It hasn’t been a contest.

  8. #3133

    Re: GLAMMY

    I had been thinking of driving down for the last home game but based on recent performances don't think i'll bother. Glam CCC is a bit like a pub serving flat beer. Upper management definitely carry the can and the lack of activity to shake things up is very unprofessional. Who wants to go and watch a team getting permanently battered?

  9. #3134

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Taffy Blue in Berkshire View Post
    I had been thinking of driving down for the last home game but based on recent performances don't think i'll bother. Glam CCC is a bit like a pub serving flat beer. Upper management definitely carry the can and the lack of activity to shake things up is very unprofessional. Who wants to go and watch a team getting permanently battered?
    We won a National tournament a couple of weeks ago and it’s beginning to look like our season effectively ended that day. While that shouldn’t really happen, I can understand it in a way, because, while the current four day format is working well for the top six sides, there is little riding on the Second and Third tiers. Glamorgan were competitive in the first phase of the Championship and we did well to finish third in a group where we were seeded to come fifth I believe - we may not be finishing it well, but I think this has been Glamorgan’s best season for a few years.

  10. #3135

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    We won a National tournament a couple of weeks ago and it’s beginning to look like our season effectively ended that day. While that shouldn’t really happen, I can understand it in a way, because, while the current four day format is working well for the top six sides, there is little riding on the Second and Third tiers. Glamorgan were competitive in the first phase of the Championship and we did well to finish third in a group where we were seeded to come fifth I believe - we may not be finishing it well, but I think this has been Glamorgan’s best season for a few years.
    The four day performances were excellent but these last two games have been dreadful.Players like Lloyd, Selman, Cooke, Carlson etc need to be consistent over a full season. Overall a good season but important to do much better in the last two games.

  11. #3136

    Re: GLAMMY

    Managed to take it to the 4th day today. But avoiding another defeat by an innings still looks beyond us.

  12. #3137

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Madassa View Post
    Managed to take it to the 4th day today. But avoiding another defeat by an innings still looks beyond us.
    Felt very sorry for Douthwaite, who batted against his natural instincts and looked set to be rewarded with a first hundred for Glamorgan when his patience snapped at 96. I agree that it looks like an innings defeat sometime in the morning session now, but, hopefully, not before Salter gets to a hundred.

    Douthwaite and Salter's partnership lasted longer in terms of overs than the rest of the batting that had come before them put together - Rutherford apart, it's been another poor showing by the so called specialist batsmen.

  13. #3138

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glamorgan lose … like Douthwaite shame Salter didn’t get a hundred (out for 90)

  14. #3139

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Park Life View Post
    Glamorgan lose … like Douthwaite shame Salter didn’t get a hundred (out for 90)
    At least they, or four of their batsmen to be precise (Van Der Guigten got a useful not out), made a game of it in the second innings.

  15. #3140

    Re: GLAMMY

    Nice to see David Lloyd back in the runs, he's 60 not out in Glamorgan's 107-0 at lunch after being put in by Gloucestershire - too early to say yet, but this looks a bit like one of those very high scoring draws you get at Cardiff every now and then.

  16. #3141

    Re: GLAMMY

    Something to ponder regarding batting tactics. The Glamorgan pair last night spent a good half hour batting for the morning as it were. Barely scored a run. Today they have lost 2 wickets already to fresh bowlers when they could have been tonking last night. It’s pretty brainless isn’t it?

  17. #3142

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Blue View Post
    Something to ponder regarding batting tactics. The Glamorgan pair last night spent a good half hour batting for the morning as it were. Barely scored a run. Today they have lost 2 wickets already to fresh bowlers when they could have been tonking last night. It’s pretty brainless isn’t it?
    It was an odd day all round yesterday with no wickets falling in the first and third sessions and six in the second one.

    Gloucestershire 20-0 in reply to Glamorgan's 309 and looking pretty comfortable in what seem to be more bowler friendly conditions than yesterday.

  18. #3143

    Re: GLAMMY

    Couple of fine catches by Chris Cooke that are worth a look at on the stream on the club website - Gloucestershire 92-2.

  19. #3144

    Re: GLAMMY

    Fair play two excellent catches by Cooke
    Andrew Salter takes his 100th first class wicket closely followed by his 101st - Glos currently 185 for 4

  20. #3145

    Re: GLAMMY

    I was listening to the cricket on 5 Lixe Extra just now and one of the commentators said she was all cricketed out by now, to which the other commentator said that’s because you’ve won a trophy. I think Glamorgan were cricketed out as soon as they took the last Durham wicket in the Final - today they allowed the last two Gloucestershire wickets to put on about 110 and they’re 57-6 in their second innings and looking at another innings defeat.

  21. #3146

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    I was listening to the cricket on 5 Lixe Extra just now and one of the commentators said she was all cricketed out by now, to which the other commentator said that’s because you’ve won a trophy. I think Glamorgan were cricketed out as soon as they took the last Durham wicket in the Final - today they allowed the last two Gloucestershire wickets to put on about 110 and they’re 57-6 in their second innings and looking at another innings defeat.
    I thought they started well, but then collapsed. 57-6 after letting them get 110 at the tail is pathetic by any standards.

  22. #3147

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by cardiff55 View Post
    I thought they started well, but then collapsed. 57-6 after letting them get 110 at the tail is pathetic by any standards.
    this collection of players needs a proverbial up the rear as they seem comfortable with losing. would they class themselves as professionals?

  23. #3148

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    I was listening to the cricket on 5 Lixe Extra just now and one of the commentators said she was all cricketed out by now, to which the other commentator said that’s because you’ve won a trophy. I think Glamorgan were cricketed out as soon as they took the last Durham wicket in the Final - today they allowed the last two Gloucestershire wickets to put on about 110 and they’re 57-6 in their second innings and looking at another innings defeat.
    This may well be the third successive innings defeat. That simply should not be seen as acceptable. Maynard should be hammering them for this.

  24. #3149

    Re: GLAMMY

    Another embarrassing non-performance. So inconsistent.

  25. #3150

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    I was listening to the cricket on 5 Lixe Extra just now and one of the commentators said she was all cricketed out by now, to which the other commentator said that’s because you’ve won a trophy. I think Glamorgan were cricketed out as soon as they took the last Durham wicket in the Final - today they allowed the last two Gloucestershire wickets to put on about 110 and they’re 57-6 in their second innings and looking at another innings defeat.
    I caught this as well and thought exactly the same TOBW. After a good start in the championship, that didn’t see us far off qualifying for the top division (mercifully, in this nick), the performances in this final quarter’s worth of games have been truly woeful. They are doing their best to take the shine off the one day cup victory and what was a very decent 4-day campaign till September!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •