+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 130 of 132 FirstFirst ... 3080120121122123124125126127128129130131132 LastLast
Results 2,581 to 2,600 of 2638

Thread: GLAMMY

  1. #2581

    Re: GLAMMY

    half way there

  2. #2582

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    half way there
    Living on a prayer??

  3. #2583

    Re: GLAMMY

    137/3. So far so good. It has been a top day for Glammy. That spell of an hour just after lunch was as well as the team have bowled and fielded in a long long time. There was a real intensity and Neser’s bowling was superb backed up by his great catch and Labuschagne’s brilliant run out. Just finish this off tomorrow please. It would be an outstanding win.

  4. #2584

    Re: GLAMMY

    Play restarted and now 143-3 with 45 wanted.
    However, Lancashire have put in a complaint that the pitch is substandard.

  5. #2585

  6. #2586

    Re: GLAMMY

    Win by six wickets for Glamorgan, Labuschagne 63 not out with a return to foes - an excellent win over a good side.

  7. #2587

    Re: GLAMMY

    Won by 6 wickets.
    Never in doubt

  8. #2588

    Re: GLAMMY

    Need Sussex and Kent to play well now. In with a good chance of top 2

  9. #2589

    Re: GLAMMY

    Great victory. Neser has bowled well and good to see Marnus finish unbeaten on a bit of form.

    Umps a bit trigger happy with LBWs but otherwise I don’t mind pitches like this, as someone said above does make batting BPs almost pointless but I’d rather close low scoring contests like this for the main and don’t think it became farcical. Shame we’re on to the short form now!

  10. #2590

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyncoed Slumdog View Post
    Play restarted and now 143-3 with 45 wanted.
    However, Lancashire have put in a complaint that the pitch is substandard.
    Well winning by six wickets chasing just short of 200 shows that with patience and application runs can be scored.

    Sounds like a bag of grapefruits to me Mister C.

  11. #2591

    Re: GLAMMY

    That prick Davies was moaning about the pitch in his interview aswell. There were enough good innings and partnerships to prove that wrong. 188 for 4 hardly suggests a bad pitch either. It was a function of attacking batsman, 2 very good bowling attacks, and as another poster pointed out the umpires made a few bad out calls. If lancashire do complain , they should be docked points for a spurious complaint

  12. #2592

    Re: GLAMMY

    A change of start time for Glamorgan's first T20 game tomorrow.

    https://glamorgancricket.com/news/st...blast-fixtures

  13. #2593

    Re: GLAMMY

    Tonight’s game is live on the Glammy website. Glos 23/1 off 3

  14. #2594

    Re: GLAMMY

    Really poor bowling. So much short stuff and it’s being despatched to and over the boundary

  15. #2595

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glos 179/6. That’s a very good score in Cardiff. Not often teams get much beyond 150.The bowling was far too short.
    Ingram and Labuschagne need to perform as Neser is not playing with only two overseas players allowed.

  16. #2596

    Re: GLAMMY

    Piss poor from the decision makers again. Selecting sisodiyia in the first place is daft, bowling him against 2 left handers in the power play is just mental. Brought back salter to face a set right hander , result 2 sixes. Timm has never been a good death bowler, why not keep him on when he was bowling well. We've got a team to do very well. Decision makers that belong in parks cricket.


    Saying that mind. Very strong batting lineup we have out there. Should still knock these off

  17. #2597

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
    Piss poor from the decision makers again. Selecting sisodiyia in the first place is daft, bowling him against 2 left handers in the power play is just mental. Brought back salter to face a set right hander , result 2 sixes. Timm has never been a good death bowler, why not keep him on when he was bowling well. We've got a team to do very well. Decision makers that belong in parks cricket.




    Saying that mind. Very strong batting lineup we have out there. Should still knock these off

    Sisodiya bowled superbly in this competition last season and bowling spinners at the start of the innings tended to work well. Not today.
    I felt TVG should have bowled his fours overs through instead of coming back on at the death.

  18. #2598

    Re: GLAMMY

    41/3 Ingram out for just 1. He was poor two seasons ago and is going to need to justify his place in the side. We can’t afford to leave someone as good as Neser out if Ingram isn’t performing.

  19. #2599

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    Sisodiya bowled superbly in this competition last season and bowling spinners at the start of the innings tended to work well. Not today.
    I felt TVG should have bowled his fours overs through instead of coming back on at the death.
    I get bowling a spinner early. But not a slow left armer against 2 left handed opening batsman. That's just asking for trouble

  20. #2600

    Re: GLAMMY

    What is the point in Selman in this format.
    Chews up balls then gets out.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •