+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results

Thread: GLAMMY

  1. #2801

    Re: GLAMMY

    Just realised it was 1st innings. Im a braindead idiot . Just needed a rant obviously !!

  2. #2802

    Re: GLAMMY

    Northants 70-3, with all of the wickets to Neser. Northants, having already lost Berg to an injury sustained before he had played any part of the match, have now, sadly, lost Proctor because of a family bereavement, so we only need to take eight wickets to win.

  3. #2803

    Re: GLAMMY

    97-4 at lunch thanks to a really daft run out off the last ball of the session.

  4. #2804

    Re: GLAMMY

    Northants survived pretty comfortably in the end at 250-5 with the pitch the winner. It seems Cardiff wickets are either so bowler friendly that you need help from the weather to go into the final day or they flatten out into absolute roads - there’s no happy medium.

  5. #2805

    Re: GLAMMY

    Just watching the bowling and it is truely is abysmal. Meanwhile Neser isn’t picked again. Maynard hasn’t taken this competition seriously.

  6. #2806

    Re: GLAMMY

    Excellent spell by twenty year old Roman Walker, who impresses me every time I see him, of four overs, three for fifteen.

    Somerset 101-4 halfway through the fourteenth over.

  7. #2807

    Re: GLAMMY

    Dreadful by Douthwaite.

  8. #2808

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Excellent spell by twenty year old Roman Walker, who impresses me every time I see him, of four overs, three for fifteen.

    Somerset 101-4 halfway through the fourteenth over.
    Yep. He has put more experienced bowlers to shame again.

  9. #2809

    Re: GLAMMY

    I really wish the commentators wouldn’t keep on going on about Ingram’s strokeplay. He isn’t worth a place in the side let alone keeping out Neser. Another poor effort tonight using up 3.3 overs for just 19 runs when we need to be scoring at 9 an over.

  10. #2810

    Re: GLAMMY

    this is pathetic, should be relegated!

  11. #2811

    Re: GLAMMY

    It’s embarrassingl. The bowling was mostly utter dross again with 9 wides and 2 no balls and loads of short stuff and bowling down the leg side. Roman Walker did superbly.
    The batting was even worse. We have Ingram back next season. If Maynard continues to play him ahead of Neser I won’t bother.

  12. #2812

    Re: GLAMMY

    Somerset have been very professional. Excellent bowling, field placing. I blame the Glammy board for employing a poor coaching team and players who continue failing.

  13. #2813

    Re: GLAMMY

    High time Walker was given a chance with the first team. I would rather see him given a chance ahead of Weighell who hasn’t done much at all.

  14. #2814

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    High time Walker was given a chance with the first team. I would rather see him given a chance ahead of Weighell who hasn’t done much at all.
    I’d definitely give Walker some four day games in September. As for Weighell, I’ve more faith in him (and I don’t have much!) as a batsman than a bowler - I don’t see what he gives us with the ball that the likes of Smith, Carey, Walker and even Dowthwaite couldn’t.

  15. #2815

    Re: GLAMMY


    k
    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    I’d definitely give Walker some four day games in September. As for Weighell, I’ve more faith in him (and I don’t have much!) as a batsman than a bowler - I don’t see what he gives us with the ball that the likes of Smith, Carey, Walker and even Dowthwaite couldn’t.
    Yep taking on Weighell when we have Walker, Smith and Carey is very poor. He has a new contract for next season too.Walker and Smith don’t. Nor TVG. Recruitment is poor. Baffled why Ingram is back again next season. He was very poor two seasons ago and has been just as bad this time around. He will be being handsomely paid for not being good enough.

  16. #2816

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glammy 184/4. Good innings from Labuschagne, Lloyd and Douthwaite. Ingram the weak link again failing to score at just a run a ball.

  17. #2817

    Re: GLAMMY

    Four or five years ago, you could make a case for saying that Ingram was the most feared hitter in the domestic T20 game - he’s thirty six now, but I’m not sure that can fully explain his decline in recent years. Watching him today, you could understand Hampshire keeping him in on purpose.

  18. #2818

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Four or five years ago, you could make a case for saying that Ingram was the most feared hitter in the domestic T20 game - he’s thirty six now, but I’m not sure that can fully explain his decline in recent years. Watching him today, you could understand Hampshire keeping him in on purpose.
    Hants are winning this at a canter. It just emphasises how poor his performance has been. Dreadful that he played today. There has been no intention of trying out Neser even though it should have been done today. The club should try and come to an agreement with Ingram so that he does not return next season or at the very least make clear he won’t be open the starting line up. It has to be performance related.

  19. #2819

    Re: GLAMMY

    Bowling masterclass

  20. #2820

    Re: GLAMMY

    100/0 off 7
    Maynard should apologise for this campaign.

  21. #2821

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quite simply rubbish. Fairplay to Hants for chasing that down within 13.

  22. #2822

    Re: GLAMMY

    In T20 this is a new low. It’s been obvious our bowling has been very weak. It’s been obvious that Ingram is a liability. Total incompetence from Maynard to not drop Ingram for Neser. We are likely to finish bottom of the group with Middlesex looking likely to win.
    Thank God this campaign is over.

  23. #2823

    Re: GLAMMY

    Embarrassingly easy for Hampshire, the other counties they can overtake must have thought oh no when they realised they only had to beat Glamorgan in the last match

  24. #2824

    Re: GLAMMY

    I can't believe I wasted a lovely Sunday to watch that utter shite. Glammy are a total disaster with no leadership and Ingram has had a mare of a season. Carlson's batting is reckless, Ingram slowed everything down with a 'Granny like' scoring rate, ok a reasonable total but actually grossly under par on that wicket. As for the bowling where do you start total incompetence to let Hampshire score at that rate. Whoever is coaching that lot needs firing and getting someone decent in. Now watch them screw up in the One Day. Very disappointing for those of us who remember Glammy in their halcyon days.

  25. #2825

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Taffy Blue in Berkshire View Post
    I can't believe I wasted a lovely Sunday to watch that utter shite. Glammy are a total disaster with no leadership and Ingram has had a mare of a season. Carlson's batting is reckless, Ingram slowed everything down with a 'Granny like' scoring rate, ok a reasonable total but actually grossly under par on that wicket. As for the bowling where do you start total incompetence to let Hampshire score at that rate. Whoever is coaching that lot needs firing and getting someone decent in. Now watch them screw up in the One Day. Very disappointing for those of us who remember Glammy in their halcyon days.
    Saw the first innings and thought it was reasonable, especially as Hants needed to take risks, but I couldn’t believe what I was seeing when I checked the result. Appalling. Were they bowling underarm?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •