+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results

Thread: GLAMMY

  1. #3026

    Re: GLAMMY

    We need to ensure we bat the full fifty overs. At 157/2 we should have been looking at over 300. Selman didn’t need to take a risk at that stage. The pitch looks flat and the outfield quick so we really need 300 on the board but that’s looking unlikely

  2. #3027

    Re: GLAMMY

    Looking very very unlikely now, Weighell looked in good form too.
    Frustrating.

  3. #3028

    Re: GLAMMY

    Hogan is a real character. Not bad for a 40-y-o.

  4. #3029

    Re: GLAMMY

    296/9 after 50 overs

  5. #3030

    Re: GLAMMY

    Hogan has more work to do yet but take 296 especially since he came in.

    I'd say outside chance.

  6. #3031

    Re: GLAMMY

    30 runs left out there at least
    Too many wickets given away when they were looking to accelerate
    Good wicket as ten out the eleven batsman got into double figures.
    Need early wickets

  7. #3032

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by willo1927 View Post
    30 runs left out there at least
    Too many wickets given away when they were looking to accelerate
    Good wicket as ten out the eleven batsman got into double figures.
    Need early wickets
    Yes shame.
    We seemed to find the fielder at crucial times.
    You never know but Durham must be huge favourites now.
    Need some rain to disrupt proceedings.

  8. #3033

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by willo1927 View Post
    30 runs left out there at least
    Too many wickets given away when they were looking to accelerate
    Good wicket as ten out the eleven batsman got into double figures.
    Need early wickets
    Yes I think we are probably 30-40 runs short.

    Goof effort I think but could have been better

    Problem is that Durham bat very deep

  9. #3034

    Re: GLAMMY

    Decent total. A good effort. Need to break up their partnerships like they did to us.

  10. #3035

    Re: GLAMMY

    It’s light of what it should have been but at 203/6 it was looking very iffy.
    A couple of early wickets needed

  11. #3036
    First Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Llantwit Major
    Posts
    2,601

    Re: GLAMMY

    It is shy of what would be seen as a par score but not by too many.
    Defendable but Durham are very much a batting side.
    This probably comes down to who handles the pressure better.

  12. #3037

    Re: GLAMMY

    Gotta take our chances when they come.
    Haven't had the rub yet, unlike them!

  13. #3038

    Re: GLAMMY

    Durham’s openers have ridden their luck here. Very frustrating. We need a wicket or two.

  14. #3039

    Re: GLAMMY

    There's the first

  15. #3040

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by MacAdder View Post
    There's the first
    Yep interesting call bringing Salter on as first change. Good start for him. C’mon Glammy.

  16. #3041

    Re: GLAMMY

    Clark GONE

  17. #3042

    Re: GLAMMY

    Salter having a great time.

    Durham not having it all their own way.... fingers crossed

  18. #3043

    Re: GLAMMY

    Bowling well at the moment

  19. #3044

    Re: GLAMMY

    Long way to go. Bancroft the dangerman.

  20. #3045

    Re: GLAMMY

    We need a wicket

  21. #3046

    Re: GLAMMY

    Tremendous fielding and bowling by Glammy.

    Let's hope they keep it up which is a tough ask, feel we need another wicket now.

  22. #3047

    Re: GLAMMY

    We really need to get Bancroft out soon.

  23. #3048

    Re: GLAMMY

    Losing our way here. Bowling too short and wide.

  24. #3049

    Re: GLAMMY

    Looking good ,but need to stop this partnership getting away. Great effort by glammy

  25. #3050

    Re: GLAMMY

    Big wicket to get Bancroft, come on Glammy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •