+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results

Thread: GLAMMY

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glamorgan have recovered to 301-7, but have taken 106 overs to do it, so they won’t be getting another bonus point.

  2. #2

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
    Apologies for the daily mail link. But it looks like an end may be in sight for the Moronic 100 ball format. With preliminary talks about changing it into a T20 format. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cr...T20-event.html
    Good. Stupid idea trying to introduce a fourth format, and no-one else in the world plays it.

  3. #3

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Undercoverinwurzelland View Post
    Good. Stupid idea trying to introduce a fourth format, and no-one else in the world plays it.
    +1

  4. #4

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Glamorgan have recovered to 301-7, but have taken 106 overs to do it, so they won’t be getting another bonus point.
    Been a slow start to the season. Though they miss the bonus points at least they’re closer to drawing the game

  5. #5

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by Undercoverinwurzelland View Post
    Good. Stupid idea trying to introduce a fourth format, and no-one else in the world plays it.
    Agree, though I do have friends down in Hampshire who love it!

  6. #6

    Re: GLAMMY

    Great partnership by cooke and Neser. From a position of hoping for a draw, now all 3 results are firmly on the table

  7. #7

    Re: GLAMMY

    376-7 at tea, the stand between Cooke and Neser now past 150.

  8. #8

  9. #9

    Re: GLAMMY

    A century for Cooke, Neser 89 not out and Glamorgan in front - 200 partnership and we’re 425-7.

    Record ninth wicket partnership for Glamorgan now - beating a ninety five year old County record.

  10. #10

    Re: GLAMMY

    Neser bowled by a ball which kept very low for 90 - maybe what has looked like a really docile wicket is beginning to show signs of wear?

  11. #11

    Re: GLAMMY

    Bloody hell. Went out after watching 5he mornings play. Just checked to see we’ve got a first innings lead. After a season watching the City I was half expecting to see that we’d had to follow on and been skittled in the 2nd innings. So very pleased to see its heading for a bore draw on day 4(probably)!

  12. #12

    Re: GLAMMY

    Match drawn. Glamorgan got a lead of sixty odd and then Leicestershire scored 240 - 3 before declaring. Glamorgan we’re the second quickest run scorers behind Notts out of the eighteen counties in the Championship last season, but Leicestershire scored their runs at a much quicker pace than us in this game - the pitch was the winner in the end though.

  13. #13

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glamorgan 20-2 against Yorkshire. For some reason, Byrom isn’t playing and Salter is opening again - he and Lloyd both out for ducks.

  14. #14

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    Glamorgan 20-2 against Yorkshire. For some reason, Byrom isn’t playing and Salter is opening again - he and Lloyd both out for ducks.
    back spasms for byrom

  15. #15

    Re: GLAMMY

    Absurd comment from the Yorkshire commentator who stated that they need the points more than Glamorgan as they're favourites for promotion!!

    Typical arrogant Yorkie twat.

  16. #16

    Re: GLAMMY

    83-2 at lunch, pretty good after being 1-2, Labuschagne very slow with just 19 off a hundred and odd balls, but Northeast seems to be finding some form with 49.

  17. #17

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by poc View Post
    back spasms for byrom

  18. #18

    Re: GLAMMY

    Looking at the other scores in Div 2, 46-2 ain't that bad.
    Also good to see Jonny Bairstow is playing for Yorkshire.

  19. #19

    Re: GLAMMY

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    83-2 at lunch, pretty good after being 1-2, Labuschagne very slow with just 19 off a hundred and odd balls, but Northeast seems to be finding some form with 49.
    Northeast immediately out for 49
    Now collapsed to 170-6

  20. #20

    Re: GLAMMY

    174-7.

  21. #21

    Re: GLAMMY

    Glamorgan did pretty well to get to 245 - didn’t look enough though. However, Yorkshire now 51-3.

  22. #22

    Re: GLAMMY

    Yorkshire 62-5 at the close with Malan and Bairstow in after Glamorgan dismissed the two nightwatchmen the home side sent in.

  23. #23

  24. #24

    Re: GLAMMY

    Hat trick by Neser (Malan, Hill and Bess) 90-8 - six wickets for Neser.

  25. #25

    Re: GLAMMY

    Yorkshire 106 all out.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •