In view of the evidence emerging of Israeli filming of Nice and Munich 'terror attacks' over the last few weeks, what could possibly go wrong?
http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news...urity-olympics
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
In view of the evidence emerging of Israeli filming of Nice and Munich 'terror attacks' over the last few weeks, what could possibly go wrong?
http://www.thejc.com/news/world-news...urity-olympics
Ah, Feedback, the one time leader of the fundamentalist corporate media believers. Fair play to him, he could articulate his position very well on many topics. He'd still get mangled on a regular basis though. When in trouble his faithful acolytes, led by TruBlue, would enter threads to misdirect.
My fave discussion concerned the Tribe. Of course, he maintained that six million perished. Images were uploaded of memorial plaques that appeared at Auschwitz in the late 1940s and early 1990s. The first stated four million died there, the second had a revised figure of 1.5 million. He was asked how his total (along with Hollywood's) remained at six million. He nor his bag carriers could provide an answer to that simple maths question (in spite of him being an accountant).
Not true TB. You can never find anything that I have ever written, spoke, or thought about, which comes remotely close to what you have just alleged. You (and anyone else) are free to examine my Twitter feed for any evidence of what you have alleged. By all means criticize my politics. They're are based on justice, freedom from oppression, racism, and apartheid, along with self-determination for the Palestinian people.
I have no idea what you've ever written on Twitter, however I can clearly remember the Auscwitz thread where you were more concerned with the total figure than the actual event. Organ clearly remembers it as well as he's the one who referenced it. I expect we aren't the only two on here who remember it.
You're in great company Splotty, chris made the same prediction for the euros
No, to be fair you are not making the news. However, you have drawn a very odd link between "evidence" of Israeli's filming recent terrorist attacks, and the fact this security firm also comes from Israel. Not a logical link at all.
Let's see this evidence of filming.
The first thing that I would have questioned is the link between 'Israeli filming' of two recent 'terrorist incidents' I may then have looked at why all the Israeli installed cameras magically failed to work on buses and tubes during 7/7. After that I might have questioned why Israeli operatives boasted on TV that the reason that they were caught filming the twin towers on 9/11 was because they were there to 'document the event', going back further in time I would have recalled that the same reason 'document the event' was carried out by another Israeli agent, (Abe Zapruder) in Dallas when President JFK parted company with his brains. Now call me the suspicious type if you like, but when something walks like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a pretty reasonable assumption to think, that it's a duck...
This sets the scene
http://www.debka.com/article/25551/N...ant-windshield
An Israeli (Mossad) news agency confirming that the rented ice cream truck was fitted with a "bullet resistant windshield". The reason? To create the impression that this was a well planned, well organised terrorist cell in France capable of stripping down a truck and retro-fitting bullet resistant windshields.
Then you have to have a cameraman who knows precisely what will happen and when it will happen.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/07/22/nice-munich/
With someone to feed him the information as to where these incidents will take place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdSkFmqTrLY
Hang on. I am not speculating on whether or not the truck was fitted with a bullet resistant windshield. But, what evidence do you have that the article was written purely for the reason you stated? That is your opinion, it isn't a fact.
This is a part of the Kevin Barrett show. Barrett is a conspiracy theorist who has made spurious claims about 9/11 with little evidence. The video backs up your claims - but that isn't saying much. It's a video where three people share opinions, but provide little evidence to back anything up.
1 + 1 + 1 = 338648294
Sorry, just the way I see these things.