Reply With QuoteWhy is is Journalists always get called "investigative" journalists when we like what they say, weird isn't it......Originally Posted by Splott Dave
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Funny you should bring that up Doc. Christopher Bollyn is well known as an investigative journalist for the detailed work that he carried out on his investigation into 9/11. This is his view of the Nice Munich incidents.
http://www.bollyn.com/#article_15668
Why is is Journalists always get called "investigative" journalists when we like what they say, weird isn't it......
If you check out Chris Bollyn you'll find that he carries out exhaustive investigations on some of his articles, with updates as and when fresh or new information comes to light. As an independent he's not constrained by deadlines or having to comply with an editorial line on an issue. This particular article mentions Ronald Lauder (Estee Lauder) who has been also connected to 9/11, "Lauder has funded a school for the Mossad in Herzliya, Israel."
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/so...ol_911_107.htm
There is definitely something not right about this because as a professional his video report would have been copyrighted to him and thus sold by agencies all around the world.
That is what happened with regard to Nice but when it came to the incident in Munich we find it reported thus:
"The Israeli media is working to downplay the significance of Gutjahr's presence at both terror events, even suggesting that he was not at the scene in Munich because his photos have been deleted from his Twitter account. This is how the Times of Israel tried to mislead its readers, writing below the headline that Gutjahr was "supposedly" present at both events: "Gutjahr’s Twitter profile shows he posted pictures from Nice but not from Munich."
The Jewish Press website provides the details about the reason why Gutjahr's photos are no longer available on Twitter:
Now it gets complicated: after shooting the truck massacre in Nice more than two weeks ago, journalist Richard Gutjahr was also present during the police operation at the Olympia shopping center in Munich and tweeted pictures from the incident. Gutjahr shared one picture of a group of armed police at the mall entrance, and another of armed officers crouching behind a wall.
Then he tweeted: “I made mistakes today. Could not believe that I once again ended up in such a situation. The images are now gone. #OEZ” The hashtag stands for Olympia-Einkaufszentrum, the mall where the attack took place."
Now all you need to look at is all the other times when Israeli or Israeli agents have been present at various 'incidents' documenting the event, to see that all is not as it appears.
I must be an investigative journalist then,it took me almost a minute to find this-
https://www.journalism.co.uk/video/h.../s400/a658883/
It's a family affair.
https://dublinsmickdotcom.wordpress....le-get-around/
Daughter in holidaying with her dad shocker.
And she says her grandmother lives a couple of minutes away by foot from the Munich shopping centre.
Funny how the link from Splotty saying WHAT A COINCIDENCE THAT HE WAS AT BOTH didn't mention that his mother/mother-in-law lives so close.
He also forget to mention gutjar lives in munich and quite why he linked both attacks eludes me.
Read the reports carefully, they don't make sense.
Nice, holiday didn't have his equipment with him,(which he normally has with him all the time) so used an Iphone which he then used to do 80 live broadcasts around the world.
Munich, no equipment with him again, despite being in his car on his way to work? He claims videos sent for free distribution but if you check they are subject to his personal copyright.
I think it's just work in progress at present and I'm waiting for more to come out about this.
I think you should wait because this is flimsy. Free distribution but under his copyright? Totally normal. He's on holiday so doesn't have equipment? Yes, he's on holiday. He's travelling to work so doesn't have his equipment? Makes sense to leave it in work. Why would he bring it back and fore every day?
You didn't acknowledge any of the points made above. As usual.
He hasnt answered why he linked an islamist massacre with a revenge killing spree
Have you got the Nan's address? Maybe somebody would like to interview her. They seem to be a media friendly family
" didn't mention that his mother/mother-in-law lives so close."
You or I have no idea what distance his mother/mother-in-law lives from the incident. That would remain to be seen and confirmed as fact.
You haven't acknowledged that there are connections that simply should not exist.
Debka (Mossad outlet) claiming that the truck had been fitted with 'bullet resistant windshield.' Another Israeli paper claiming that the same truck was doing 100 kph down the boulevard of Nice. The reporter's/actor's wife's connections to Israeli intelligence, the fact he deleted tweets of his appearance at the Munich incident, the wife's connections to Lauder (Estee Lauder) who finances the Mossad school in Israel. The same applies to the Israeli TV crew who just happened to be passing when the supermarket hostage drama was taken place in Paris, or Charlie Hebdo, located in a Rothschild building and financed by Xavier Neil, a French/Israeli billionaire, or Bataclan previously owned by Israeli/French owners who are now in Israel. What about 9/11's Mossad agents on Israeli TV explaining that the reason their cameras were ready before a plane had hit a tower, was because 'they were there to document the event'. Or 7/7 where now current Israeli PM Netanyahu, was warned six minutes before the first explosion not to leave his hotel. Or Mossad agent, Abe Zapruder who filmed JFK losing his mind in Dallas?
Too many coincidences for them to be purely coincidental.
Exactly, I'm filing this one under mysterious coincidences until further facts surface. It has also been alleged her old man was also at the Bataclan in Paris, and he was phoning up witnesses who had no idea where he got their number from, and asking to interview them outside the theatre.
It appears the thread has gone full moon.
Journalists tend to keep their equipment at hand in a grab-bag, so that they can respond to events at a moment's notice. You've been watching too many movies, following your logic all journalists keep their pencils and notepads at work, and cannot respond to events without first calling into the office
Here's another of those coincidences that we are asked to ignore or swallow.
His wife's first Wiki Bio:
http://archive.is/Y5O6S
Then after the truck attack the scrubbed version deleting all reference to her intelligence background.
https://archive.is/mLLXI
http://www.cafebabel.de/gesellschaft...-bataclan.html
https://twitter.com/gutjahr/status/665302969835913217
He's a real action man....Journalists tend to keep their equipment at hand in a grab-bag, so that they can respond to events at a moment's notice. You've been watching too many movies, following your logic all journalists keep their pencils and notepads at work, and cannot respond to events without first calling into the office
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOSVcsIOTFc
Why they never showed him going to the office to pick up his gadgets (camera) before embarking on his daredevil escapades!
Serious question: Who paid for that?
Here is his equipment
CT-IDy7XIAA8gpL.jpg
Would you care to translate?
His wife was once considered as an Ambassador for Israel at the United Nations.
http://jpupdates.com/2015/07/28/neta...dor-to-the-un/
The first link is the same as her current wiki page,
Posting Permissions