The Donald Trump thread

[Wales-Bales]

Sorry to labour the point but those ballots sent to all Registered voters rather than a requested absentee ballot (what you call a registered ballot) is that what you are calling an unregistered ballot?

If so what does the recipient of such a ballot (whether they got it because they were registered of just plucked one of the trillions floating around in pubs beforehand) have to do to cast a vote?

Then what do the authorities do when they recieve it (key point of clarification is it different to what they do when they receive an absentee (registered) ballot?

Clear answers and no-one will think that you are just a cut and paste bollocks merchant!

Yes, the boxes of ballots found in bushes and abandoned buildings can all be filled in by a single person, who pretends to be the person named on the ballot.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Yes, the boxes of ballots found in bushes and abandoned buildings can all be filled in by a single person, who pretends to be the person named on the ballot.

How do they do that...by incredibly being able to forge the signature of the individual who has to provide a signature as an obligation of becoming a registered voter (there's that phrase again) to get on the electoral roll of voters to receive a ballot in the first place?

Just talk us through the fraud. I will start:

1) Dodgy Dem/Antifa/Progressive finds 500 ballots washing around in the pubs beforehand

What are the next steps they take to be able to cast a vote for Joe Biden?

[Wales-Bales]

How do they do that...by incredibly being able to forge the signature of the individual who has to provide a signature as an obligation of becoming a registered voter (there's that phrase again) to get on the electoral roll of voters to receive a ballot in the first place?

Just talk us through the fraud. I will start:

1) Dodgy Dem/Antifa/Progressive finds 500 ballots washing around in the pubs beforehand

What are the next steps they take to be able to cast a vote for Joe Biden?

Nobody will be checking dude, there will be tens of millions of them to count. You thought Mueller's investigation was legit, so maybe you're not the best equipped person to be commenting on cases of fraudulent activity

[cyril evans awaydays]

No one will be checking dude, there will be tens of millions of them to count. You thought Mueller's investigation was legit, so maybe your not best equipped person to comment on fraud

Forget the deflection. When you say no-one will be checking what do you mean? That the signature on the outside of the ballot will not be checked by election officials?

Now as others have pointed out this process could take a while and might give people not absolutely wedded to the democratic process all opportunities to play games.


If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.

You don't have to look this stupid every time you are completely wrong you know!

[Wales-Bales]

Forget the deflection. When you say no-one will be checking what do you mean? That the signature on the outside of the ballot will not be checked by election officials?

Now as others have pointed out this process could take a while and might give people not absolutely wedded to the democratic process all opportunities to play games.


If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.

You don't have to look this stupid every time you are completely wrong you know!

Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!

[cyril evans awaydays]

Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!

Q If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.

A. Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!

Four years of the Politics Board Redux!

[Wales-Bales]

Q If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.

A. Just wait and see what happens, it's all been planned out a long time ago!

Four years of the Politics Board Redux!

Forget about the mechanics of it all, as it's a bit above your pay grade, but just like Russia collusion and the Muellerr investigation, I will be proved right yet again. I always win the long game, and I know it drives you nuts

[lardy]

Forget the deflection. When you say no-one will be checking what do you mean? That the signature on the outside of the ballot will not be checked by election officials?

Now as others have pointed out this process could take a while and might give people not absolutely wedded to the democratic process all opportunities to play games.


If you have any evidence that the same verification (there's that word again) process whether someone requested an absentee vote, was sent one or found 500 in a hedge won't be applied before a vote is confirmed as valid now is your chance to post it.

You don't have to look this stupid every time you are completely wrong you know!

"No one will be checking"

Our resident US expert doesn't know that the two parties are entitled to have people watching each postal vote being opened and challenging it. A successful challenge means the vote is binned.

The republicans are advertising frantically for watchers, knowing that each postal vote that is excluded is more likely to be a vote for the opposition than them.

It'll come as a huge surprise to us all, but gluey is talking total rubbish. "No one will be checking" - they will be checked and challenged more closely than ever.

[Wales-Bales]

"No one will be checking"

Our resident US expert doesn't know that the two parties are entitled to have people watching each postal vote being opened and challenging it. A successful challenge means the vote is binned.

The republicans are advertising frantically for watchers, knowing that each postal vote that is excluded is more likely to be a vote for the opposition than them.

It'll come as a huge surprise to us all, but gluey is talking total rubbish. "No one will be checking" - they will be checked and challenged more closely than ever.

It will take them months to count the millions of postal ballots, so no winner will be declared on the night of the election, or during the legally specified timeframe following the election. Are you thick or something? (no need to answer!)

[cyril evans awaydays]

It will take them months to count the millions of postal ballots, so no winner will be declared on the night of the election, or during the legally specified timeframe following the election. Are you thick or something? (no need to answer!)

When requesting an absentee voting ballet you have to provide details of who you are and it can only be used by the applicant. With the bulk mail-in scam, hundreds of millions of ballots are sent out to all and sundry including the the dead and previous occupants, etc, so people can just fill them in and vote multiple times. Boxes of these ballots have been turning up in empty buildings and underneath people's hedges. The Dems can't win without cheating, and having the media publish their daily lies

Who the feck would come up with this as an answer before saying that the fraud problem with mail in ballots, wasn't a fraud problem at all just the time you need in a Covid crisis to count them all