The "he" is her boss who is identified as CC-1 on the charge sheet.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr...isclosing-sars.
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
The "he" is her boss who is identified as CC-1 on the charge sheet.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr...isclosing-sars.
So any time you are ready to post the proof that she has been charged with anything to do with Cohen as you stated. Looks like you are at Contradiction - states the opposing case with little or no supporting evidence on that pyramid of debate you handily posted in another thread!Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
There is no evidence from the charge sheet that CC-1 was engaged with anything to do with the Cohen leak to a different reporter on the New Yorker and/or Avenatti. The references to CC-1 relate to communication with the Buzzfeed reporter (Reporter 1)between late-August and October 2018. Cohen's financial details were leaked in May 2018!
That is not to say either or both individuals were not the source of the Cohen leak, just that there is not a shred of evidence in this indictment to support a definitive statement that the leaker of the Cohen materials has been arrested and it's bad news for Porn Lawyers (whatever they are)
Again I have to ask if you could post the evidence you used to support this strong assertion.
Keep on digging, you will get there eventually. I wonder if CC-1 had any connections to the DOJ? Now that would be something wouldn't it!
A classic Wales-Bales move. Makes a statement. Gets challenged to evidence it. Doesn't. Rambles on about something else. Repeat ad infinitum. (with apologies to Taunton Blue Genie just in case he has any copyright on the paragraph)!
Join the dots mun, the truth is out there! I could name names, but rather than speculating I will let them come out by themselves, but I did give you a big hint
Join the dots on these statementsJoin the dots mun, the truth is out there! I could name names, but rather than speculating I will let them come out by themselves, but I did give you a big hint
The leaker of the Michael Cohen financial records has been arrested (WB)
A woman is arrested
The arrest indictment makes no such mention of anything to do with Cohen
The Hill says that the Cohen leaker is male
Ah says WB her boss is male (who has not been arrested as a leaker) and is identified as CC-1 in the indictment
The references to her boss in the indictment have nothing to do with Cohen and neither the reporter nor the time frame fit
Oh says WB you know CC-1, the one that hasn't been charged and as I said the leaker has already been arrested, you want to watch that one.
Nice to have any proof for the assertion that the only person arrested is the leaker says I.
Come on dumbo, just accept that I have fantastic sources that prove beyond doubt all that I have said but I can't share them with you or the rest of the world right now (all evidence based that I can point to cos that's the only way I operate) though says WB.
How did I do?
Stop watching CNN!
Funnily enough, I work in the field of Intellectual Property but you are more than welcome to reproduce my utterings at any juncture
I think you might have mentioned it on the odd occasion on here in the pastFunnily enough, I work in the field of Intellectual Property but you are more than welcome to reproduce my utterings at any juncture
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote