Quote Originally Posted by xsnaggle View Post
Not too long ago Cummins was the most vilified person in the UK and people were trying to have him prosecuted for going to Durham when he said he didn't go. Horrible man, peop0le generally agreed, being protected by the government.
now, suddenly, everything he says must be right (According to the BBC yesterday). you can't have it both ways.
I'd suggest that the truth probably lie somewhere in the middle.
What he is saying he is saying to a parliamentary committee and he can say anything he likes without fear of any comeback. But if all the things he says are true why didn't he resign on a point of principle and go to the press with what he allegedly knew then?
The other problem is, like with people remembering things later, people don't remember 100%, they remember their own memory but that is changed by the brain which absorbs thoughts that may have been thought when the person was remembering earlier and by the clamour of media all around them every day, so when the stand up and tell what they saw it is their adjusted memory that is talking, so people hearing must allow for it.
One thing is pretty sure though, he don't like Hancock much.
If the truth is "somewhere in the middle" which parts of what he was saying do you not believe?

Because there is an awful lot of evidence out there for a lot of it.

the "herd immunity" policy
Hancock lying about all people being returned to care homes being tested first
10s of thousands of people needlessly died
which parts aren't you convinced by?