Coronavirus update - NO MORE RESTRICTIONS

[the other bob wilson]

Quite. But it is a paper for the guidance of the government and is a worst case scenario. I just think that the way you posted it tended to overlook the knowledgeable people who gainsayed the documents conclusions, that's all.
nothing like a bit of balance.

Seems to me like a classic case of someone basing the tone of their reply on their perception of the person making the original post - I said myself that I doubted their figures.

[xsnaggle]

Seems to me like a classic case of someone basing the tone of their reply on their perception of the person making the original post - I said myself that I doubted their figures.

what is that supposed to mean?

[the other bob wilson]

what is that supposed to mean?

Seemsd as clear as day to me, you just wanted to have an argument despite me saying much the same as you did.

[xsnaggle]

Seemsd as clear as day to me, you just wanted to have an argument despite me saying much the same as you did.

no I didn't particularly want an argument, i was just stressing the level of improbability in the numbers you posted.
but it was "their perception of the person making the original post " which I was referring to. It seems to imply that I have some axe to grind with you personally and that I do not, nor can i think why you would imagine I do.