Quote Originally Posted by TWGL1 View Post
Only relaying what I was told … perhaps they had it three times and the fourth was inaccurate, then the picture would fit the article…. I think a poster on here tested positive 3 times.
It’s pointless nitpicking.

Do you think the testing is accurate?
Yes perhaps that's it. Perhaps the article is about the 62 people who tested positive four times, but there's a whole other group who tested positive four times but only three of the tests were accurate. I'm sure the data has that kind of layering.

The article should make clear that they had four separate positives and really really had it four times.