Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
I'm in general agreement with you - I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say I can't argue with your first paragraph, but you do a good job of explaining why, for me, his judgement was faulty in so many ways.
We are into, or very close to, "if, but and maybe's" territory when it comes to interpreting Government guidelines now, the original ones were, presumably, designed to be crystal clear and, as Matt Hancock said in one of the briefings were instructions, not recommendations.
One other thing, I've been listening to 5 Live a lot this morning and there are plenty of people phoning in to defend Dominic Cummings citing how awful the press have been to him. I won't say those defending him are the type who call people they disagree with "snowflakes" as a matter of course, but an awful lot of them seem very sensitive to criticism, as does Mr Cummings it appears given the part "security" played in his decision to drive his family to Durham - it all seems very snowflakish to me