Oi! I didn't accuse him of changing his opinion, ! don't know what his opinion was. The advise the government takes is an average of lots of different opinion, (I did hear there are up to 100 people in Sage for different things).
all I said was that until he fcuked up (literally) he was being touted as the leading expert, and he never said that at the time. I used the word 'apparently' meaning that he hadn't voiced that opinion at the time, that's all!
If he was lauded as the font of all knowledge on the subject why didn't he say it then? (Not asking you by the way, just what I was thinking)
I just think that like a lot of the stuff that is said and printed it is with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.
Is that OK? I'd hate to get into an argument about it.