+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 122

Thread: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

  1. #1

    No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    What’s the point of opening up hotels and campsites, if there’s nothing for visitors to do !!!!

    https://apple.news/Ah_8EYmjkRWu6xJfZRBII5w

    Yes be careful, but people’s futures are on the line here

  2. #2

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by BLUETIT View Post
    What’s the point of opening up hotels and campsites, if there’s nothing for visitors to do !!!!

    https://apple.news/Ah_8EYmjkRWu6xJfZRBII5w

    Yes be careful, but people’s futures are on the line here
    Drakeford gets an easy ride. No criticism, no awkward questions, BBC and local media all seem happy to accept his every 'move'. As I said previously I don't think he's the slightest bit bothered about anything regarding economy, jobs, etc.

  3. #3

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
    Drakeford gets an easy ride. No criticism, no awkward questions, BBC and local media all seem happy to accept his every 'move'. As I said previously I don't think he's the slightest bit bothered about anything regarding economy, jobs, etc.
    All he is interested in is making a name for himself.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    D'Qar
    Posts
    1,945

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
    Drakeford gets an easy ride. No criticism, no awkward questions, BBC and local media all seem happy to accept his every 'move'. As I said previously I don't think he's the slightest bit bothered about anything regarding economy, jobs, etc.
    He's definitely putting health before wealth.

  5. #5

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO View Post
    He's definitely putting health before wealth.
    He cant make a decision. His main aim is just to make sure that any blame for anything that is done is deflected away from himself and his party. If he doesn't make a decision he cant be blamed for it if it goes wrong. Meanwhile the Welsh economy ‘burns’.

  6. #6
    International
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baku, Azerbaijan
    Posts
    11,653

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    He is definitely putting politics before people.

  7. #7

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO View Post
    He's definitely putting health before wealth.
    Maybe. You can have lockdown/restrictions til eternity with just 1 new case per month, but there comes a time when the risks have to be viewed in the light of every other aspect of our lives..

  8. #8

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
    Drakeford gets an easy ride. No criticism, no awkward questions, BBC and local media all seem happy to accept his every 'move'. As I said previously I don't think he's the slightest bit bothered about anything regarding economy, jobs, etc.
    Quote Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO View Post
    He's definitely putting health before wealth.

    I know what you’re saying with “health before wealth”, but he may be also not taking into account what he is doing to people mentally.

    Hopefully I’m wrong, but these times COULD take people to the edge, even suicide !!!!

    As I say, hopefully not, but these people down the bay, might not have the business acumen, to make these decisions. They’re pen pushers, nothing more

    OEN UP WALES NOW !!!!!

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    D'Qar
    Posts
    1,945

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by xsnaggle View Post
    He is definitely putting politics before people.
    He difinitely is presiding over a period where the hospitals coped, and where his decisions have resulted in the lowest R rates in the country. He definitely doesn't seem to be going against scientific advice.

  10. #10

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO View Post
    He difinitely is presiding over a period where the hospitals coped, and where his decisions have resulted in the lowest R rates in the country. He definitely doesn't seem to be going against scientific advice.
    He’s playing with 11 men behind the ball, he’s got to attack some time.

    There’s being careful and there’s being “Please god, don’t let me make a mistake”

    Wales’s businesses are dying

  11. #11

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    He cant win

    It wasnt that long ago people owning tourist attractions were telling people to stay away ! Dont bring the virus here !

    Now everyone wants everything opened up

    And this is obviously a political post as we have the same old crew having a dig

    Hes got the charisma of a wet fish but hes doing the right thing

    The effects of this virus on peoples mental health is going to be with us for a long time but it's either lots of people going to their doctors for anti depressants or people dying with a second wave of the virus

  12. #12

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by dml1954 View Post
    All he is interested in is making a name for himself.
    Complete load of arse

  13. #13

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by CCFCC3PO View Post
    He difinitely is presiding over a period where the hospitals coped, and where his decisions have resulted in the lowest R rates in the country. He definitely doesn't seem to be going against scientific advice.
    I don't know where you get the idea that we have the lowest R rate. The latest R value from the Technical Advice Cell, they supply the R data to the Senedd, was 0.9 average. That data is before the three food processing outbreaks, so I bet the next data will higher

  14. #14
    International
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baku, Azerbaijan
    Posts
    11,653

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    As mentioned elsewhere as total deaths and infection rates come down come down the R rate becomes less and less useful as a measure, although never completely so. The figures just need to be closely monitored and action taken when a particular area seems to increase, such as the meat plants in Anglesey. But there, where action should have been taken to control spread he has sat on his hands and done nothing!
    Hospitals coped because of the lockdown enforced nationwide not be any particular thing that Mr Drakeford did. But they nearly ran out of PPE and nearly failed to appreciate the spread because of things he and his Minister said they had done or were going to do, and didn't!

  15. #15

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by lisvaneblue View Post
    I don't know where you get the idea that we have the lowest R rate. The latest R value from the Technical Advice Cell, they supply the R data to the Senedd, was 0.9 average. That data is before the three food processing outbreaks, so I bet the next data will higher
    Hence the need to be cautious.

    Wales has a poorer population than England, and it has an older population, with more health complications. Far less of the elderly population live in leafy suburbs in Wales than in england, which are practically social isolation anyway. An independant study stated that something like out o the 10 most vulnerable towns for an outbreak were in Wales.

    We should be being more cautious than England, if we were just following their lead then what would the point of having the assembly be?
    England are putting money over lives, and given the above factors it would be even worse for us if we were to follow them.

    Some people seem to be jumping on any opportunity to criticise Drakeford because of the party he represents

  16. #16

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by xsnaggle View Post
    As mentioned elsewhere as total deaths and infection rates come down come down the R rate becomes less and less useful as a measure, although never completely so. The figures just need to be closely monitored and action taken when a particular area seems to increase, such as the meat plants in Anglesey. But there, where action should have been taken to control spread he has sat on his hands and done nothing!
    Hospitals coped because of the lockdown enforced nationwide not be any particular thing that Mr Drakeford did. But they nearly ran out of PPE and nearly failed to appreciate the spread because of things he and his Minister said they had done or were going to do, and didn't!
    That's the lockdown enforced by boris and his chummy mates that was way too late and led to us having the highest rate in europe ?

    In england not only did they nearly run out of ppe , they actually did ! All down to decisions made by boris

    Thank god we didnt have him in charge

  17. #17
    International
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baku, Azerbaijan
    Posts
    11,653

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    Hence the need to be cautious.

    Wales has a poorer population than England, and it has an older population, with more health complications. Far less of the elderly population live in leafy suburbs in Wales than in england, which are practically social isolation anyway. An independant study stated that something like out o the 10 most vulnerable towns for an outbreak were in Wales.

    We should be being more cautious than England, if we were just following their lead then what would the point of having the assembly be?
    England are putting money over lives, and given the above factors it would be even worse for us if we were to follow them.

    Some people seem to be jumping on any opportunity to criticise Drakeford because of the party he represents
    My criticisms of him are nothing to do with his party, but basically the man. As sludge said he is a "wet fish" and I think that's putting it kindly. I commented on his lack of gravitas and charisma long ago in other threads. He is as far as appearing as a leader as he could possibly get, and the way he says things and his terminology demonstrates he his basic parochial tendencies. I think we'd have been far better off if Carwyn Jones were still first minister.

    But with regard to his party he is not exactly mainstream in that either is he? He was one of the first to endorse JC when he stood for the leadership, and we know how well that went, he is a member of Unite and Unison, both hard left unions, and a member of momentum, which needs no introduction. He is also reputedly (allegedly) a very nasty person. I'm quite sure that if you spoke to a lot of Labour voting welshmen and women privately they would tell you they wish he wasn't there. I do ask my firneds and that is the overwhelming reponse.

  18. #18

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by lisvaneblue View Post
    I don't know where you get the idea that we have the lowest R rate. The latest R value from the Technical Advice Cell, they supply the R data to the Senedd, was 0.9 average. That data is before the three food processing outbreaks, so I bet the next data will higher
    All the more reason for Drakeford to remain cautious unlike Free For All Johnson. A few more weeks staying like we are could turn out to be vital, after all this time I’d be devastated if I caught it now because a politician jumped the gun through pressure, it’d be akin to being shot at 5 to 11 on Armistice Day.

  19. #19

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Only a couple of months ago lots of people were rounding on Organ Morgan, myself included, over his attitude that the economy mattered, lives didn't. Boris Johnso came under huge fire for his "loved ones are going to die" speech, before deciding on a lockdown.

    It's as if we're all a bit bored of not being able to do what we used to do, so everything needs opening up.

    We're back at the wealth or health question. England has chosen to go for wealth. The government has decided to ignore scientific advice in part because some people have decided they want to go to pubs, go to the beach etc. Johnson has gone for the popular opinion, which as we all know isn't always the right one.

    Drakeford's more cautious approach is one I applaud in part, but there are contradictions in what we can and cannot do. It hasn't been well thought out.

    My feeling is now that we should perhaps open up everything. Sod it. I won't be going anywhere. I'll be continuing to keep distancing and protecting me and my family. Those who think they won't be affected can all meet up and form the second wave, like some giant Darwin award.

  20. #20
    International
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Baku, Azerbaijan
    Posts
    11,653

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Only a couple of months ago lots of people were rounding on Organ Morgan, myself included, over his attitude that the economy mattered, lives didn't. Boris Johnso came under huge fire for his "loved ones are going to die" speech, before deciding on a lockdown.

    It's as if we're all a bit bored of not being able to do what we used to do, so everything needs opening up.

    We're back at the wealth or health question. England has chosen to go for wealth. The government has decided to ignore scientific advice in part because some people have decided they want to go to pubs, go to the beach etc. Johnson has gone for the popular opinion, which as we all know isn't always the right one.

    Drakeford's more cautious approach is one I applaud in part, but there are contradictions in what we can and cannot do. It hasn't been well thought out.

    My feeling is now that we should perhaps open up everything. Sod it. I won't be going anywhere. I'll be continuing to keep distancing and protecting me and my family. Those who think they won't be affected can all meet up and form the second wave, like some giant Darwin award.
    with regard to your last para there is actually a kernel of sense in that. If things are opened up, those the feel the need can use the facilities, and those like yourself, who don't want to will still be free to make that choice.
    So long as the things about the infection that matter are monitored and test and trace is rigorously applied then it should be controllable. It will never be 100% safe and no one can expect that, but if it's manageable then we need to live our lives.

    The problem comes when people are told they can go back to work and risk infection and soon will have no choice because of the end of furlough, and at the same time are being told that having put themselves at risk in order to work, they cannot have the freedom of choice to put themselves at risk (or not) for their own personal pleasures in life.

  21. #21

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Only a couple of months ago lots of people were rounding on Organ Morgan, myself included, over his attitude that the economy mattered, lives didn't. Boris Johnso came under huge fire for his "loved ones are going to die" speech, before deciding on a lockdown.

    It's as if we're all a bit bored of not being able to do what we used to do, so everything needs opening up.

    We're back at the wealth or health question. England has chosen to go for wealth. The government has decided to ignore scientific advice in part because some people have decided they want to go to pubs, go to the beach etc. Johnson has gone for the popular opinion, which as we all know isn't always the right one.

    Drakeford's more cautious approach is one I applaud in part, but there are contradictions in what we can and cannot do. It hasn't been well thought out.

    My feeling is now that we should perhaps open up everything. Sod it. I won't be going anywhere. I'll be continuing to keep distancing and protecting me and my family. Those who think they won't be affected can all meet up and form the second wave, like some giant Darwin award.
    It is amazing and, indeed, worrying that some people think they’re bulletproof. I wonder how the ‘open everything up’ brigade would feel if they or one of their loved ones succumbed at this stage?

  22. #22

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    I am glad that Wales has largely been able to plough it's own furrow. Whether we like it or not, devolution has come of age during the pandemic.
    I certainly trust Drakeford more than Johnson. I think recent surveys show I am in the majority.
    Having said all that, Wales Gov has been placed in an invidious position now that England is effectively unlocked. Also Sturgeon announced yesterday something similar in Scotland.
    Radical changes are going to have to he made in Wales, sooner than later.
    I for one am going to be very cautious over the next few months. I hope everyone else is.

  23. #23

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Leaving aside his charisma (or lack of it) Drakeford’s stance is quite clever. It is always easier to let someone else take the lead in any unusual situation so that if things turn out badly then you can say “well thankfully we were more cautious” and if things turn out well, then you can happily announce that you will now allow similar actions. Win, win surely?

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    D'Qar
    Posts
    1,945

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Quote Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
    Maybe. You can have lockdown/restrictions til eternity with just 1 new case per month, but there comes a time when the risks have to be viewed in the light of every other aspect of our lives..
    Have we recorded just one new case a month? We are currently recording 50 new cases (of those tested) a day - or 1,500 a month - without counting those not tested. So, we are a long way off your 1 case a month figure.

    Quote Originally Posted by BLUETIT View Post
    He’s playing with 11 men behind the ball, he’s got to attack some time.

    There’s being careful and there’s being “Please god, don’t let me make a mistake”

    Wales’s businesses are dying
    It's not a football game mate. It's a lot more serious than that.

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    He cant win

    It wasnt that long ago people owning tourist attractions were telling people to stay away ! Dont bring the virus here !

    Now everyone wants everything opened up

    And this is obviously a political post as we have the same old crew having a dig

    Hes got the charisma of a wet fish but hes doing the right thing

    The effects of this virus on peoples mental health is going to be with us for a long time but it's either lots of people going to their doctors for anti depressants or people dying with a second wave of the virus
    My sentiments exactly, it is a no-win situation but some are using it to simply have a go at the bloke who is, as you say, a wet-fish. But, he isn't cavalier, and his decisions are not being asterisked with a "These decisions are not risk free" by scientists - unlike Johnson's clearly political motives.

    Quote Originally Posted by lisvaneblue View Post
    I don't know where you get the idea that we have the lowest R rate. The latest R value from the Technical Advice Cell, they supply the R data to the Senedd, was 0.9 average. That data is before the three food processing outbreaks, so I bet the next data will higher
    I'd like to see a link on that.

    Quote Originally Posted by xsnaggle View Post
    As mentioned elsewhere as total deaths and infection rates come down come down the R rate becomes less and less useful as a measure, although never completely so.

    If the R rate is such a poor marker, how come countries like Germany (where the infection and death rates are ACTUALLY low, and not "I'M PROUD OF OUR RECORD" low) - still continue to use it? The r rate is a bad measure when it shows the Government may be getting it wrong. They use the same tactic to avoid the figures on child poverty - quoting the figures that paint them in a favourable light, and not the ones that make them look bad. Similarly, the Opposition do the same in reverse. The R rate is a scientific measure that is useful at all times.

    Quote Originally Posted by xsnaggle View Post
    My criticisms of him are nothing to do with his party, but basically the man. As sludge said he is a "wet fish" and I think that's putting it kindly. I commented on his lack of gravitas and charisma long ago in other threads.
    That's completely uncharacteristic of you, to play the man and not the ball - to use a football parlance.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
    Only a couple of months ago lots of people were rounding on Organ Morgan, myself included, over his attitude that the economy mattered, lives didn't. Boris Johnso came under huge fire for his "loved ones are going to die" speech, before deciding on a lockdown.

    It's as if we're all a bit bored of not being able to do what we used to do, so everything needs opening up.

    We're back at the wealth or health question. England has chosen to go for wealth. The government has decided to ignore scientific advice in part because some people have decided they want to go to pubs, go to the beach etc. Johnson has gone for the popular opinion, which as we all know isn't always the right one.

    Drakeford's more cautious approach is one I applaud in part, but there are contradictions in what we can and cannot do. It hasn't been well thought out.

    My feeling is now that we should perhaps open up everything. Sod it. I won't be going anywhere. I'll be continuing to keep distancing and protecting me and my family. Those who think they won't be affected can all meet up and form the second wave, like some giant Darwin award.
    I agree with you completely. The 5 mile rule, whilst I can see what it is trying to achieve, is a complete nonsense for example.

    Quote Originally Posted by splott parker View Post
    It is amazing and, indeed, worrying that some people think they’re bulletproof. I wonder how the ‘open everything up’ brigade would feel if they or one of their loved ones succumbed at this stage?
    Apparently, when you get bored of it, it just goes away. I wonder what the Government will tell us in the next briefing. Oh, that's right, they don't have them anymore. Result - illusion that this is all over. Result - warnings of second waves.

  25. #25

    Re: No confidence vote, against DRAKEFORD, from Welsh Tourist Body !!

    Instinctively I like the more cautious approach followed by Drakeford. However, Drakeford is not paying for the furlough support or the absence of VAT or income tax receipts so is under far less pressure to get things moving than Johnson. I wonder if the Welsh government were directly affected by the drain on the National Exchequer he would employ a more liberal approach. At the moment I agree with the earlier post; Drakeford is in a win win situation and will be proven right especially if there is a second spike.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •