Another "Lesser" club done by VAR

[MacAdder]

I don't think that's true. The VAR generally backs the referee whenever possible. Pretty much every Premier League club, regardless of its status, has been the victim of some ridiculous VAR decisions this season. The system sucks big time, but I don't think it discriminates. It's just rubbish across the board.

I think it is true.
And so what if the VAR generally backs the referee?
I'm saying it was the 80 million pound player who "bought" the penalty.
If it's at the other end where a Villa 'nobody' goes over, it ain't given.
Patrice Evra said that it could have even been given as a free kick to the Villa defender, which is the way I saw it.

VAR has to go IMO and the "monitor at the side" system made available for the referee to review if he feels he may have got it wrong. That way he is solely responsible for the decision, as it always has been, which people can accept.

[The Lone Gunman]

And so what if the VAR generally backs the referee?

I believe the VAR will generally try to back the on-field referee regardless of who he gives a decision against.

If you don't believe that, then fair enough. Nothing I say is going to change your mind as you apparently believe modern football sucks. I believe the whole VAR system sucks and I don't believe it favours the big clubs at all - it's just rubbish.

[DubaiDai]

VAR has to go IMO and the "monitor at the side" system made available for the referee to review if he feels he may have got it wrong. That way he is solely responsible for the decision, as it always has been, which people can accept.[/QUOTE]

Sorry to say every referee in a MU game would face 11 players remonstrating and insisting he go to the monitor on EVERY decision.