An inevitability?

[Eric Cartman]

Well we have seen a lot of anti BBC comments on this board over the last few years accusing the BBC being a right wing tool ,which I've never understood its seems in recent times its more like a Liberal /Left woke vehicle.

The BBC treads carefully around government **** ups and always has, I don't think I have ever seen anybody say 'the BBC is right wing'. We happen to have a right wing government so it will feel that way right now. They tread carefully when it comes to most issues, they try incredibly hard not to pick sides which can make reading their articles/watching their shows excruciating sometimes.

What have you seen personally that makes you think the BBC is left wing?

[Jordi Culé]

The BBC treads carefully around government **** ups and always has, I don't think I have ever seen anybody say 'the BBC is right wing'. We happen to have a right wing government so it will feel that way right now. They tread carefully when it comes to most issues, they try incredibly hard not to pick sides which can make reading their articles/watching their shows excruciating sometimes.

What have you seen personally that makes you think the BBC is left wing?

(In LoM's eyes)

Gary Lineker.

[lardy]

The BBC treads carefully around government **** ups and always has, I don't think I have ever seen anybody say 'the BBC is right wing'. We happen to have a right wing government so it will feel that way right now. They tread carefully when it comes to most issues, they try incredibly hard not to pick sides which can make reading their articles/watching their shows excruciating sometimes.

What have you seen personally that makes you think the BBC is left wing?

This is their biggest fault, a determination to show balance.

If they're talking climate change, they need to get a denier on the other side of the table, which makes it appear like a 50-50 debate rather than widely established and agreed.

This is what enabled Nigel Faridge to get on Question Time so often and build up a cult. He wasn't there because the BBC is right wing, but because they had an obsession to give everyone an equal voice whether they deserved it or not.

[Wales-Bales]

If they're talking climate change, they need to get a denier on the other side of the table, which makes it appear like a 50-50 debate rather than widely established and agreed.

If as you say it was widely established and agreed, America wouldn't have pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord, so please stop posting your opinions as fact. We had enough of that with all of your Steele dossier propaganda #&$%!!

[jon1959]

If as you say it was widely established and agreed, America wouldn't have pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord, so please stop posting your opinions as fact. We had enough of that with all of your Steele dossier propaganda #&$%!!

What a load of bollux.

The Trump administration is quite capable of denying climate change in the face of overwhelming evidence and global opinion without having an equal weight of argument.

The ultimate proof of that is that they did - and you came on here to cheer them on like a good little nodding dog.

[Jordi Culé]

What a load of bollux.

The Trump administration is quite capable of denying climate change in the face of overwhelming evidence and global opinion without having an equal weight of argument.

The ultimate proof of that is that they did - and you came on here to cheer them on like a good little nodding dog.

That’s because he’s either here to wind people up or a massive cock.

Thinking about it, he’s probably both.

A massive wind up cock.

[Wales-Bales]

That’s because he’s either here to wind people up or a massive cock.

Thinking about it, he’s probably both.

A massive wind up cock.

Welcome to the lady & cyril sheep farm. Happy grazing!

[Jordi Culé]

Welcome to the lady & cyril sheep farm. Happy grazing!

You’re actually being serious with your views.

Wara teg, you’re a ****ing looper.

[Wales-Bales]

What a load of bollux.

The Trump administration is quite capable of denying climate change in the face of overwhelming evidence and global opinion without having an equal weight of argument.

The ultimate proof of that is that they did - and you came on here to cheer them on like a good little nodding dog.

They would have to justify their actions with counter arguments.

[Eric Cartman]

They would have to justify their actions with counter arguments.

Since when have they had to do that? I can't think of anything Trump has done which is evidence led, from 'Muslim Ban' to Climate Change Denial to 'Covid is a hoax'