Cardiff's staggered work hours plan to cut city centre congestion

[xsnaggle]

If they only restore what was it won't be. It never went that far above ground

[BLUETIT]

If they only restore what was it won't be. It never went that far above ground

Pardon ?????

[xsnaggle]

Pardon ?????

Wot?

[BLUETIT]

If they only restore what was it won't be. It never went that far above ground

Pardon ?????

Wot?

I respect everything that you have written on this topic and Castle Street, BUT, these sentences may sound great in your head, BUT read them back.

They make no sense at all

[xsnaggle]

I respect everything that you have written on this topic and Castle Street, BUT, these sentences may sound great in your head, BUT read them back.

They make no sense at all

The poster said if they restore the canal in Churchill way it will mess up the traffic at the end. I point out that if they only uncover what was originally uncovered it will not in fact disrupt the traffic. It always went underground before that point and re-emerged just north of Hurbert St as already mentioned. Any further explanation required, please ask.

[BLUETIT]

The poster said if they restore the canal in Churchill way it will mess up the traffic at the end. I point out that if they only uncover what was originally uncovered it will not in fact disrupt the traffic. It always went underground before that point and re-emerged just north of Hurbert St as already mentioned. Any further explanation required, please ask.

It wasn't underground, it was an actual canal with barges on it.

It pointless trying to explain it, as it doesn't make any sense, even when you've tried to explain it.

[xsnaggle]

It wasn't underground, it was an actual canal with barges on it.

It pointless trying to explain it, as it doesn't make any sense, even when you've tried to explain it.

It wasn't a canal, it is a feeder for the Alexandra dock, built specifically from the Taff at blackweir to the dock to keep the water level up at low tides.

[splott parker]

The poster said if they restore the canal in Churchill way it will mess up the traffic at the end. I point out that if they only uncover what was originally uncovered it will not in fact disrupt the traffic. It always went underground before that point and re-emerged just north of Hurbert St as already mentioned. Any further explanation required, please ask.

Herbert St, please, my mother used to live there

[xsnaggle]

Herbert St, please, my mother used to live there

Sorry pardon!!!

[BLUETIT]

If they only restore what was it won't be. It never went that far above ground

Can anyone understand this ?

"what was it won't be" ???????????

[xsnaggle]

Can anyone understand this ?

"what was it won't be" ???????????

The poster said, "On the down side the southern end of Churchill Way is a main route for traffic, so yet an other pain in the backside for drivers trying to get across the city."
If they only uncover the part they covered it won't be a pain in the backside because the bit the poster was referring to was never uncovered in the first place.

[BLUETIT]

Can anyone understand this ?

"what was it won't be" ???????????

The poster said, "On the down side the southern end of Churchill Way is a main route for traffic, so yet an other pain in the backside for drivers trying to get across the city."
If they only uncover the part they covered it won't be a pain in the backside because the bit the poster was referring to was never uncovered in the first place.

Still, "what was it won't be" ?????

[xsnaggle]

Still, "what was it won't be" ?????

OK, iIll fill in all the words for you, "If they only restore what was previously open then it will not be a pain in the backside for traffic at the end of Churchill Way because that was never open in the first place, it was always covered."

I'll put it in words of 1 syllable if you need me to.

[BLUETIT]

Can anyone understand this ?

"what was it won't be" ???????????

The poster said, "On the down side the southern end of Churchill Way is a main route for traffic, so yet an other pain in the backside for drivers trying to get across the city."
If they only uncover the part they covered it won't be a pain in the backside because the bit the poster was referring to was never uncovered in the first place.

Nope !