Reply With QuoteBut there are two sides to this. Look at the risk to the killer's mental health having to stay in prison for years and years.Originally Posted by William Treseder
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Helen's Law: Killers could still be freed despite new law https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan...yside-55419384
What an absolute joke. What a kick in the teeth for these victims families.
But there are two sides to this. Look at the risk to the killer's mental health having to stay in prison for years and years.
Build super prisons on the many islands off the coast's of Britain, for the real scum of this world,
Your paedophiles,
Murderers,
Rapists,
Terrorists
No visits, no contact with the outside world, no tv's, no Internet etc etc
Make them work for their keep in purpose built factories inside the prisons 12 hours a day.
Properly manned with the right amount of armed guards with the power to shoot when needed. They would be self sufficient prisons and would not cost the honest working people a penny to keep these evil vile scum!!!!!!!!!
The killer is not the victim.
Sod him
Don't forget the not wearing of the masks we'll send them cnuts there as well.
WTF?!?!
No we should be learning from the Norwegian prisions, look at their re-offending rates compared to the UK prison system.
Brutal super prisons only make things worse.
He’s joking you donut
Exactly look at the state of the prison system in the US. In private hands makes them even worse.
Would you change your mind if someone close to you was abused or murdered?
And they gave him or her a nice easy time in prison with early release for good behaviour!!!!!!
But there is a reason they don't put family members on the jury.
Well the ones who get released have to be someone's neighbour, so it's better to have a penal system that reforms people and reduces crime.
Yeah right that really works lol
Let's hope they never move in next to you.
Last edited by Its been emotional; 23-12-20 at 10:47. Reason: Add more
They have to live next door to someone. That being the case, far better that they've been reformed, and taught how to live in society and given skills to turn their life around than been brutalized and locked up with other criminals.
People like to compare criminals to animals, so let's do that.
Say there are 2 dogs, they both bite someone. One is locked up with a dozen more vicious dogs, with no contact with the outside world for a year.
The other is trained how to interact with people and they spend a year trying to correct the dog's bad behaviour.
Which would you want to be bought by the bloke next door?
It’s more that most people who go to prison aren’t murderers or peadophiles and will be released so you want them to be reformed. And it works well in countries that has humane prisons.
I agree very violent criminals shouldn’t be released but most people in prisons aren’t.
My list was the most vile evil criminals???
So you are saying that you would be happy having a convicted paedophile move in next door to you, with your young children or grandchildren interacting with them?
we are way to soft
Without knowing more about the assessment of risk and what significance is given to withholding information within that assessment it's very difficult to comment. I presume the significance can vary case by case.Failure to co-operate and reveal such information is "frowned upon" by the board and could see a prisoner having requests for parole denied in the first instance, Mr Jones said.
However, he added: "What it cannot do is act as a complete block on your release.
"Ultimately if someone is no longer a risk, we must release them."
I think we can guess the answer to that one
That is the question that should be posed to these legal people calling the shots.
Whatever their response, we all know of course it would never happen.
Everyone who gets released from prison is going to live next door to someone, would you rather they were coming out of a system that had tried to integrate them into society, or a system that had brutalised them?I think we can guess the answer to that one
That is the question that should be posed to these legal people calling the shots.
Whatever their response, we all know of course it would never happen.
Rjk you have not answered the question just swerved it.......
Would you be happy having a convicted paedophile move in next door to you?
Perhaps you should respond to "It's been emotional" s direct question not me?
You didn't answer my question either.
So you wouldn't like it then?
Last edited by Its been emotional; 23-12-20 at 12:06. Reason: Spelling
Posting Permissions
