+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Still trying to figure out how the question in the title of this thread leads to, another, discussion on here in which posters with left wing views end up dissing the Labour Party (or at least the Welsh part of it this time) - what’s that saying........with friends like these, who needs enemies?
Do I want to pay more income tax?
Not me there’s plenty of less regressive taxes and the real tax avoidance is from the internet based companies
I’m still trying to get my head round the OP assertion that we are currently taxed more than anytime in last 46 years?
Because they're right wing, and have fallen into the arms of a right wing media and the perceived sensibilities of right wing policy. If sludge and co were around 70 odd years ago they would be talking of the NHS and education as a wonderful idea, although fanciful and idealistically naive. That's how far we've sunk I'm afraid.
you silly **** , I am left wing but the things I want are not achievable by voting for a far left party because not enough people will support it to gain enough seats to form a government
If I had my way I would nationalise water , gas , electricity and trains but its not going to happen
You can live in a dreamworld or try and get politicians elected who will help you see some of your principles in actual reality
There was a bloke standing for the Welsh socialists a few years back , he got 15 votes
Great ideas but I would hope u can see the reality
A left of centre democratic alternative to the tories would sweep up
The next time the far right March in Cardiff I will be there and I expect to see you there too , then you can tell me I am not a socialist
Everyone will be paying more tax, example 1 Lords allowance.jpg
Wales is "too poor to be independent" but can afford things like this, the UK government and its political system wastes more money than anything in the world.
Interesting articles regarding the Wales is not big enough to be an independent country bollox;-
https://www.theglobalist.com/smaller...n-a-big-world/
https://www.worldometers.info/world-...on-by-country/
Wales would be around the 130 mark when it came to population size out of 238
the union will only ever be run to the benefit of south east England and London specifically.
When Ireland left the union they had a similar population as wales has now, a very underdeveloped economy and a poorly educated workforce.
Ireland today is a modern European country and has a good standard of living and high levels of wealth. If they were still in the union I cannot believe that they would have been able to develop as far, as the uk priority would still have been London.
It took a long time but if it worked for them, then why couldn't we do the same?
corporation tax has been 12.5% since the mid 2000s, in the mid 90s it was 40% ish an 50% before that.
The same points would apply to Ireland before they cut corporation tax (to a little bit less than us) as they do now.
Do you think if Ireland had remained as part of the UK from 1921 until 1991 it would have done as well as it did independently?
These are very interesting links.
The Laws in Wales Acts 1535 and 1542 made English the only language of the law courts and said that those who used Welsh would not be appointed to, or paid for, any public office in Wales. This language clause laid the foundation for a thoroughly anglicised ruling class of landed gentry in Wales. The parts of the 1535 Act relating to language were definitively repealed in 1993, by the Welsh Language Act 1993.
I lifted this from Wikipedia as I didn't want to re-write history (sic).
So, that's 1993! That's over 400 years Wales was subject to the whims and fancies of an English (London) parliament and Monarch (in this afomentioned case it was that role-model of a husband Henry VIII who kicked it off). So we haven't evolved and been allowed to develop as an independent country with our own language, economy, laws, taxes and parliament for 486 years!
In other words, we've been London's bi*tch for too long.
Yes, you're right, but I'm not entirely convinced it was to preserve the Welsh language (which some believe was its major contribution) and it also required a Monarch to grant it. I think what's also key, is that while it's always stated that The Bible was translated I believe it was The New Testament from Greek which fits in with her Reformation agenda.
BTW I should point out that I'm not entirely religious or in favour of church integration of the state so I have no particular affiliation. Also I don't believe she or any other Monarch is appointed by God. But I could be wrong!
I've wondered if it was done to stop those Welshies from moaning. I'll need to do some research into it, but I'm aware that the reformation wasn't always well received in other Celtic countries and I can imagine parts of Wales not being happy with this new Anglican church. Liz thought of a way of making the Welsh accept it, by giving them a Welsh language service to use.
I was only looking at this from a historical, rather than a religious angle. Church history is relatively well documented when, in many cases, little else exists.
There have been 62 countries that have gained independence from the UK (England), none have asked to return or have returned, why if the UK is such a benefit?
There is mis-information constantly spread about Wales and it's finances after becoming independent, a lot of countries both smaller and bigger and richer and poorer have left the UK and been successful.
The NHS is the result of an investigation into health care which resulted in a cross party report known as the Beveridge report. One of the prime movers in this was Churchill who I think was then sitting as a Liberal MP.
Good as he was Bevan just happened to be the health minister who actioned it but it would have happened anyway. There were not really any alternatives.