If any one wants to complain about the BBCs coverage of Prince Philip’s death yesterday, they can do it through this link;-
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/compla...laint/#/review
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
If any one wants to complain about the BBCs coverage of Prince Philip’s death yesterday, they can do it through this link;-
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/compla...laint/#/review
Paradoxically years ago when we only had BBC and ITV, no one would have said a word about both available channels showing this sort of programming.
The same would have been true when BBC 2 came on stream.
I think the view then was that effectively respect was being paid to the deceased particularly in the case of the BBC by a public service broadcaster and to show entertainment programs was not the done thing.
I know there is a discussion to be had about whether we should mourn a privileged individual when many more have died on the globe that day but that I'm afraid is the way of the world. You are not going to square the circle there, many will think that it is correct to do so whereas other will think it is a waste of time
Now ,when we have wall to wall TV channel, Netflix Prime Disney+ IPlaetr ITV Hub etc etc etc we grumble when 2 channels (3 if we count ITV) cancel their programs for the day.
I must admit I was initially a bit irritated when I saw that both main BBC channels were being used and I think that they could have had a bit more thought and not both shown the same things at exactly the same time, but then I thought of what I mentioned in my thirded paragraph above and realised why the BBC had done it.
I watched some of the coverage but then I had a wonderful thought. I am on Sky, I have a Sky remote and I could.......
Change channels and not watch the BBC for the day
Watched cricket instead.
I certainly wouldn't bother complaining about it. With respect to those of you who did, I find that rather petty in this day of almost unlimited TV. (Sorry TOBW, Jeepster, Mozzer and any one else who has done it but that is that is the way I feel)
Particularly when I suspect most of us rarely watch the BBC any way.
But its a free world
As someone who firmly belongs in the left and right both slag it off, so it must be doing something right, I still watch the BBC a lot, but yesterday set me thinking all of their critics might have a point. The fact it's a public server broadcaster should mean they should try to serve all of the public, including the sizeable minority who are either anti royal or not remotely interested in the Royal family. By all means, have extended coverage and reaction on one of their main channels, but there is no justification at all for it to be on both of them. Even worse though was when I thought I'd listen to some IPL or county cricket on 5 Live extra and found they'd stopped broadcasting it and then when I went on the BBC website to read their rolling coverage on the four day matches, they'd even stopped that!
Good to see today's edition of the Racing Post treating the news with the necessary level of reverence. A banner across the bottom of the front page reads:
Death of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, at the age of 99 - see page 24
I agree that the coverage is way over the top and feels at odds with a modern day Britain but it's pretty easy to avoid it in this day and age. I haven't seen a single news report or read a single article, there's plenty of other *wanky word alert* content out there these days.
God help us when the Queen goes though, they'll probably have someone come round the house and shout at us until we cry about it
I’ve thought that a few times, with her being the longest reigning monarch there’s millions of Britons who’ve lived and died without knowing any other monarch. In the past people may have been around to witness a few king’s coronations in their lifetime if they lived as long as the likes of you and me have.
I'm hardly a monarchist and whatever your views on the parasitical Saxe Coburgs but Queenie has been a significant symbolic emblem in most peoples lives in the UK.
When she pops it'll be a sob fest and I fully expect Nicholas Witchell to request being buried alive with her dead corpse.
That "Queen of Tarts" nonsense put me off Blair for good and I never voted for him since; he showed me his true colours.
It baffles me that there's people who jump on the back of any poor old benefits scrounger who hasn't got a pot to piss in but hold this load of shysters in complete reverence when they're taking us for a ride big time! The world's gone mad!
Recent opinion Polls by YouGov and Opinium and Survation showed around 55% on average supporting a monarchy with 29% in favour of a republic.
Unsurprisingly the youngest age group (18-24) was slightly in favour of a re favour of a republic.
Perhaps they should put a question on the next Census...........
I dunno. I suspect a significant majority would have taken an interest and been saddened by him dying. Frankly I couldn’t care a toss. I haven’t complained to the BBC about their totally over the top coverage. It didn’t affect me but two have both stations giving this wall to wall coverage is ridiculous.
Big conservationist was Phillip
BBC have just shown a photo of him with a huge tiger he shot dead
And he enjoyed fox hunting and shooting grouse and pheasant
Jolly good chap
If this MB is anything to go by, goodwill has already started to disappear.
Anyone think she'll abdicate?
I never ever thought she would but with Prince Philip no longer by her side and if he truely was the rock her majesty says he has been during her reign, I think it might be a real possibility.
I can certainly see the Royals becoming even less popular when Charles gets the top job, even to some diehard royalists.
I have already had more than enough of the Phil stuff (to his credit he didn't want this circus) but it did remind me of this....
Prince Edmund The Blackadder, Duke of Edinburgh, dies: