+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
If social care was brought under direct control of NHS and local authorities then that would be a start .....better wages , secure employment , workers rights .......but for many years thanks to thatcher private companies bid for care packages from local councils
They treat the staff like shit and pay them shit ........and therfore the standard of care is shit
Yet the private companies roll more and more money in , year in year out
And anyone who thinks the care staff looking after their loved ones in a nice home are on good wages ........don't be mistaken
The owners of these care homes ?
Minted
I think it needs to be all under the NHS, local authorities should not be involved.
if the budgets are controlled by the same group then there aren't conflicts of interest and they can focus on better outcomes for patients.
they might be able to redirect some NHS money into care to ensure better availability, meaning less beds are blocked and less hospital acquired infections etc
Does the other half , as it were or any relative living there as their main home whilst wife or husband is in care home eventually have to pay care home fees for loved one as you say the house is ignored ?
I assume savings are then looked at ?
But once they run out what happens regarding care fees , if the house isn't counted and there is no savings or investments left .....who pays ?
As I see it not much has changed and the new arrangements are far from being a solution to the problem of long term care. The government's statement is all smoke and mirrors. Originally I thought the government had at least made a decision about future care but the bottom line is that even under the new arrangements, once savings are exhausted, houses will have to be sold to pay for the housing element of care for a single individual as well as for care itself. This of course pre-supposes that the house is not required to house a partner/spouse who is able to remain as that component is not included.
Many thanks to Carl Dale who has advanced my understanding of the situation.
I think this is sticking plaster
Pensioners tend to vote tory and read the daily mail
If there were tax rises across the board , which is needed to claw things back , then half the country would be up in arms
The tories have been in charge for 11 years now , they have to break out of this no tax increases nonsense
Sludge
this government is collecting more in tax than any government before it. We currently pay around 35% of GDP in taxation. The Tories are not a party of low taxes, a complete myth peddled by the party and its supporters.
People seem to be ignoring that employers will also pay an extra 1.25% NIER and shareholders will also pay an extra 1.25% on dividends.
The devil is in the detail, and if this was Labour announcing these tax rises and spend decisions, those on the left would be hailing it as revolutionary and much needed. which it is.
they should raise inheritance tax. make it massive. close the loopholes that people avoid paying it.
many older people are sitting on huge property values that by mostly luck have increased incredibly while they've lived there. they've done nothing to create that increase it has just happened.
people inheriting that wealth have done nothing to earn it either other than be born to the right people
Well somethings not right because the carers in South Wales are all on 9 pound an hour
The private companies are making a killing on the backs of the vulnerable and the carers they employ
The council put the contracts out for care to care companies and those that get the work are the cheapest
That's the free market for you 😉
Just jumping on this thread as the whole thing confuses me.
My situation is I own 50% of my mothers home as tenants in common. I also have power of attorney set up.
My mother does not need care home etc at the moment but I’m unsure as to what I can do to protect the house ?
We went through years of austerity where so many things were cut. Is this latest announcement proof that there is no more left to cut, even that austerity was the wrong course of action?