+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I like him and his satirical, sarcy tone. I'm not sure the artistic license is unfounded when it comes to Boris anyway, and this 'Johnson is something of a late convert to the reality of the climate crisis. We know that and he knows that. He’s even admitted it was only when he got to Downing Street and academics walked him through the science that the penny really dropped' from Crace sums him up really well. The problem with Johnson is not the speech and what's in it, it is his credibility and lack of gravitas IMO. This is the same person we see 'performing' at PMQs and it's hard to take him seriously.
a good debate by labour man Paul Embrey speaking to australian sky news regarding the effects and consequences to ordinary people in a net zero world by 2050
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN9pgCf8fCM
I must be missing something. Are you supporting the statement or arguing against it because your link doesn't support it? In fact the most important link in your linked piece is this one: The Wuhan lab leak theory is more about politics than science
The lab-leak theory is just that....a theory.
the Americans have basically said they can't tell where it came from as there isn't enough evidence. then the wording of their statement suggests that the lab leak theory just as likely as animal transmission, when almost all scientists you see quoted in the subject would disagree.
the statement definitely doesn't say the the us "pretty much state that it comes from a lab" AQMonkfish clearly hasn't understood it properly
It won't be the first time I've got one of Crace's pieces wrong or been whooshed by him. I thought it was one of his satirical columns but looking at it again I'm not sure what it was because there's other stuff that is very serious.
So, I'm now confused and agree with you that Johnson should provide plenty of material. I didn't read or listen to his speech so wasn't aware. As I say, I'm now confused by the whole thing which is disappointing because it's not an issue which needs any further misinformation.
Last edited by Citizen's Nephew; 02-11-21 at 19:19. Reason: Clarification
My initial judgement on you, although unkind, was due to your hypocrisy, although I've gone on hearsay.
You're a deluded ****er mind, lacking any self awareness.
It's funny, because you take yourself so seriously.
Please carry on. Genuinely amusing.
You missed my initial question to you in this thread by the way about people in the public eye who may get treated as some quasi religious deities who are above questioning.
Do ya know what, I've got no interest in engaging with trolls who clearly don't read what people write. You are actually being pretty abusive now. You are completely wasting your time so take your personal abuse elsewhere.
That you type stuff like that about people you don't know and still think to click post says more about you than me.
Have a nice evening
Can't this be put in the alternative message board. Sick of hearing about it.
Just noticed this thread, can’t believe the Chinese government aren’t there? Wtf is that about? A quarter of carbon emissions comes from them doesn’t it?
Bloody Cop out 100 , guess who drove their carbon emissions up , along with India and others yes us the greedy let's have it on the cheap western society's, yep we're all guilty.
Boris's very good analogy was a clever description that the UK must lead climate action because it 'knitted the deadly tea cosy' of climate change
so was COP 26 a success or in the words of Sludge all hot air ??