Possible COVID PASSES for pubs !!!

[Rjk]

I take on board your link from The Lancet , as I feel we need to debate freely something this important however, The Lancet Global Health Commission on High Quality Health Systems in the SDG Era is supported by funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

On that basis I think the comparisons to Flu would be more accurate if discussed in Parliament.

The Lancet is very well respected and I'm not aware of any credible accusations of bias. I'm not sure what the Bill and melinda gates foundation funding relates to exactly, I know they are heavily involved in healthcare issues worldwide so it isn't a surprise they will have reason t interact with the lancet.

Parliament is not a credible source. People can say any old shite in parliament and not get called out on it. I've read hansard on some debates on a couple of topics I had some knowledge in and found people were talking utter shite, unchallenged throughout. MPs are usually not experts. Lets not pretend that it is more reliable than the lancet because it is convenient for a point you are making.

[TWGL1]

The Lancet is very well respected and I'm not aware of any credible accusations of bias. I'm not sure what the Bill and melinda gates foundation funding relates to exactly, I know they are heavily involved in healthcare issues worldwide so it isn't a surprise they will have reason t interact with the lancet.

Parliament is not a credible source. People can say any old shite in parliament and not get called out on it. I've read hansard on some debates on a couple of topics I had some knowledge in and found people were talking utter shite, unchallenged throughout. MPs are usually not experts. Lets not pretend that it is more reliable than the lancet because it is convenient for a point you are making.

The funding will in my opinion give it a conflict of interest, but as I’ve said it’s important to debate things like this.

The pass in my opinion could be discriminatory and could lead to a two tiered society.

I agree that some things in Parliament are debatable and unimportant, however COVID facts gives it a different perspective altogether.

Ultimately 30% will be all for it ( regardless of any counter opinion), 40% will be on the fence and the other 30% will be against.

[lardy]

The funding will in my opinion give it a conflict of interest, but as I’ve said it’s important to debate things like this.

The pass in my opinion could be discriminatory and could lead to a two tiered society.

I agree that some things in Parliament are debatable and unimportant, however COVID facts gives it a different perspective altogether.

Ultimately 30% will be all for it ( regardless of any counter opinion), 40% will be on the fence and the other 30% will be against.

All research, including research you like, is funded.

And we're surely far enough down these tracks to take parliament with a pinch of salt.

[Rjk]

The funding will in my opinion give it a conflict of interest, but as I’ve said it’s important to debate things like this.

The pass in my opinion could be discriminatory and could lead to a two tiered society.

I agree that some things in Parliament are debatable and unimportant, however COVID facts gives it a different perspective altogether.

Ultimately 30% will be all for it ( regardless of any counter opinion), 40% will be on the fence and the other 30% will be against.

What specifically is the funding? how does it lead to a conflict of interest? what are Bill Gates "interests" that are relevant here, other than wanting to improve health?. Id doesn't seem like you've thought this though other than saying Bill Gates = Bad.

[TWGL1]

What specifically is the funding? how does it lead to a conflict of interest? what are Bill Gates "interests" that are relevant here, other than wanting to improve health?. Id doesn't seem like you've thought this though other than saying Bill Gates = Bad.

It’s just my opinion , ultimately I’m just replying to a thread on here. I have thought it through, but it’s up you to make an informed decision yourself. Im just quoting what Steven Baker raised in Parliament, which I found interesting and relevant to the debate about passports in pubs. You don’t have to agree do you ?

My personal opinion is that it should be for everything or nothing at all. I know people in my family who are in retail and Leisure and it’s going to make it very difficult for them to survive.

[JamesWales]

The funding will in my opinion give it a conflict of interest, but as I’ve said it’s important to debate things like this.

The pass in my opinion could be discriminatory and could lead to a two tiered society.

I agree that some things in Parliament are debatable and unimportant, however COVID facts gives it a different perspective altogether.

Ultimately 30% will be all for it ( regardless of any counter opinion), 40% will be on the fence and the other 30% will be against.

I agree entirely. There is a lot of very regressive stuff being pushed through and normalised at the moment.

I have had both vaccines, wholly support the vaccination programme and would encourage people to do so, but people's bodies are their own and I don't agree in allowing or denying entry to places in ones own country based on vaccinations etc. Covid will come and go but there are certain societal norms that I think we should be wary of giving up.

[az city]

The funding will in my opinion give it a conflict of interest, but as I’ve said it’s important to debate things like this.

The pass in my opinion could be discriminatory and could lead to a two tiered society.

I agree that some things in Parliament are debatable and unimportant, however COVID facts gives it a different perspective altogether.

Ultimately 30% will be all for it ( regardless of any counter opinion), 40% will be on the fence and the other 30% will be against.

Complete and utter bollocks. Because the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded the work doesn't mean it's biased. I've done work paid for by that Foundation and I can tell you from experience they did not interfere one jot.

[lardy]

The Lancet is very well respected and I'm not aware of any credible accusations of bias. I'm not sure what the Bill and melinda gates foundation funding relates to exactly, I know they are heavily involved in healthcare issues worldwide so it isn't a surprise they will have reason t interact with the lancet.

Parliament is not a credible source. People can say any old shite in parliament and not get called out on it. I've read hansard on some debates on a couple of topics I had some knowledge in and found people were talking utter shite, unchallenged throughout. MPs are usually not experts. Lets not pretend that it is more reliable than the lancet because it is convenient for a point you are making.

Bill Gates is the go-to name for covid conspiracy theorists, just like Soros is for political ones. Not saying this TGW guy is one, but alarm bells ring when he's brought into it.

[TWGL1]

😂