| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Wembley finals would be ok, isn't something I'd particularly want as a fan there to see a match but it's also not going to overly bother me.
It would bother me if it's put in place at every match though (obviously without the entertainment) as we would have another 10 minutes of Bartley racing against a recycling bin.
“Just nipping down to grab a pie”
“Be quick, Adele and Bono’s duet is up next”
I wouldn’t mind some entertainment the 45 minutes before and the 45 minutes after half time
Originally Posted by splott parker
I wouldn’t mind some entertainment the 45 minutes before and the 45 minutes after half time
Very good 👍I wouldn’t mind some entertainment the 45 minutes before and the 45 minutes after half time
Half time in the champions league final or the world cup final at a push and even then I'm not keen. You are there to see football, not watch some singer you probably don't like prancing about on stage.
I wouldn't be keen on another synchronised performance of NHS beds.
the Olympics opening ceremony? I actually enjoyed that
We are all God's children, old fruit.
What would be the point? It's not like attendances at finals are low and need a boost
You're there to watch football, not Ed Sheeran
I'd be perfectly content with this for big finals, semi finals etc tbh.
I wonder how the players feel about hanging around for an extra ten minutes whilst Jedward flounce around with the Cheeky Girls.*
*Yes, I know I'm out of touch regarding popular culture
How many are old enough to remember the Saturdays when you’d watch Grandstand or World of Sport until twenty to five when the first results from the three o clock kick offs would start coming in? You’d get forty five minutes each way.and ten minutes for half time then and it’s still exactly the same game, yet it takes fifteen to twenty minutes longer these days, why?
So true. And back then, Bob, you didn't have referees taking 70 seconds over an ordinary free kick outside the box and over 90 seconds if a booking was included. Also it didn't take over a minute to restart a game after a goal and goalkeepers taking an age over goalkicks etc. Tan's Chinese dragon interlude at half time was bad enough and 15 minutes is more than ample.
StT.
<><
Do you know anyone who pays their £20 or whatever it is to get into a football match these days for the bits during the two hours when there’s no football being played? I don’t and yet these would appear to be the people this proposal is geared towards. All this is about is trying to increase bar and food takings through trying to get people to eat or drink more during the ever growing intervals when there’s no football being played.
I think they've seen the money generated by the TV audience for the Superbowl and thought that they want a bit of that. the advertising revenue during the half time show is astronomical and they want their crown jewel events to be similar.
so you turn it into.an event that will attract non football watchers. the people watching the game are already a captive audience.
Methinks your answer is not a million miles from the truth there. When a corner takes 45 secs and 75 secs for a restart from a goal you know the product on display has nothing to do with the fans.
StT.
<><
Surely the 75 seconds spent celebrating a goal is the best part of the match for a fan?
Who would we get at the CCS?I wonder how the players feel about hanging around for an extra ten minutes whilst Jedward flounce around with the Cheeky Girls.*
*Yes, I know I'm out of touch regarding popular culture
They've had local bands play before Wales matches before, but not in the middle. I remember the Manics playing before we beat Italy. I think they stopped it after Goldie Lookin Chain were rude about Beckham's wife.
One would hope that 'wardrobe malfunctions' could be avoided by any artistes performing at half-time on those Tuesday evening games in January.
Injury time. You rarely had any at half time. In the second half, you'd be lucky if there was any more than a couple of minutes added on despite 3 players being stretchered off in separate incidents and a 10 minute pitch invasion.
Back in the mid 90s, before the announcment of how long injury time would be, I remember Newcastle, who were top of the Prem, getting an equaliser in something like the 4th minute of injury time against Chelsea in the FA cup. There were comments suggesting it was similar to Fergie time, where Man Utd seemed to enjoy lots of injury time. In one paper, though, I read a comment from a top ref of the time backing the amount of injury time in the game concerned and said it should have been longer, giving reasons.
Some refs will add on time in injury time if a team makes a substitution or wastes time, scores a goal etc. Injury time management is much better than it was, though it seems to be commonplace that a side getting thrashed will only have to contend with 2 mins of injury time at the most even if there had been a mass brawl between the players that required 6 ambulances on the pitch.
Would an extra 5 minutes at half time stop some from going to the bars so early?
That wouldn't stop, they'd just ram in another pint with the extra 5 minutes.
Isn't that a generalisation and disparaging to boot? Not everyone who partakes of pint of beer at half-time behaves the same way.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote