+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
You may right , but more and more of this data is being reported , if it was wildly inaccurate it would not be published would it ?
I would imagine the statistics for flu would 40% higher if they tested it in the same way ?
Unlike all of the other UK right leaning newspapers I believe, Wikipedia does not treat the Daily Mail as a reliable source - the piece linked would be much more convincing I feel if it had come from a source which doesn’t have the sort of agenda the Mail does when it comes to Covid.
Is this all connected to the 'with covid' or 'of covid' data discrepancies?
You lose all credibility if you post a link from the daily mail.
What about the ONS or the Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ut-not-by-much
I just think some people are trying their hardest to squeeze the pips out of this story because they have a certain agenda. For me there's far more urgent priorities to address.
No agenda from me , just an alternative view which is healthy I’d say when you consider how the last two years have impacted mental health , delayed treatment for serious Illness , dentistry , not to mention the economic crash which is probably never going to recover. On a positive note , at least stories like these are slowly dripping through when it was known by many after about three weeks in. Science is always about debate and risk/benefits.