To hear Gluey talk, you’d think that the Mueller Report was a total vindication of the Trump campaign which routed those who dared to think otherwise. He brings up the triumph that was “no collusion” on every opportunity he can and on quite a few occasions when it has no relevance to the matter being discussed.

Now, I’ve never had the degree of obsession that Gluey did before he took his time off when it comes to the former President, I doubt if Ive read one per cent of the stuff he has on the subject.

However, when the man who wrote the report into the relationship between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in the 2016 election refutes Trump’s “no collusion, no obstruction” line, you do wonder if it was all as clear cut as Gluey makes out;-

https://www.politico.eu/article/muel...truction-line/

Furthermore, a read of the Conspiracy or co-ordination v collusion and false no collusion claims sections of the Wikipedia entry for the Mueller Report does get you wondering whether Gluey maybe overdoing the triumphalism somewhat;-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muelle...n_vs_collusion